jis muashray main qanoon ka nifaaz na ho wahan aysay raweye samnay aatay hain...jaraaim to hr jagah her mulk main hain lakin wahan shaid insaaf mil jata hay is ley sub ik dosray k ley masaawe jazbaat rakhtay hain
hamare society main jis per zulm hoa or woh jub daikhta hay k na us ko insaaf mil raha hay na log us ko woh support day rahay hain jo woh chahta hay to woh nafsyaati tor per sub ko zalim samjhta hay or apna her action jaaiz samjhta hay .. to ayse bay hisee dekhnay main atee hay
kal ki bat hay gher k samnay mehndi function tha ...is waqt qoom jis sadmay main hay us layhaaz say theek hay woh apna function kertay lakin saadge dikha saktay thay..itna loud music cheekhain shor ...k bayaan say bahir
ab in main say he kitnay log honay gay jo apni face book per afsos or dukh ka izhar ker k aye hon gay ..shaid candels bhi jalayeen hoon..
lakin agar pishawar attack main mutasir family ka ik bhi fard woh sub sunta ya daikhta us k dil per kia guzartee?.. us ka to yeh dil chahta k ja ker un sub ko maar day...mera to yehe chah raha tha ! 3 din ka sog to shareeat bhi kehte hain log itna bhi ahsas nahi kertay !
We have become insensitive because we have learned the at of shifting blames. We don't take personal responsibility of anything that is happening around us. It's always some berooni, yahoodi, nasraani taaqat ... It's never our fault. Hum tou masoom hain.
He said that we don't take responsibility like what is happening is happening to some aliens. We don't have connection, because we fail to realise that somewhere we have also played some role / or haven't played due role, which lead to this situation.
PS: I hope use of 'we' will not be condemned this time :)
I doubt any of the responses here is on the topic but venting of frustrations. Ok, the topic is insensitivity of society. For "some people", the reaction of religious people on act of TTP is insensitivity. But for religious people, the reaction of "some people" on act of US forces against Muslim world is considered insensitivity.
And hypocrisy cannot be identified by looking at one side of picture. I hardly see any sensitivity in those people who consider religious people insensitive while hundreds of people including children have been killed in Iraq and Egypt. So this is called actually nationalism > hypocrisy > insensitivity instead.
Its not about Taliban or Peshawer incident only. I have given examples of target killing in Karachi and victims being treated as a regular number. Treatment of this by authorities as well as public as 'Nothing extraordinary' as it happens in all big cities of the world.
I don't know and I won't say whether Mullas are insensitive as a whole, but I must say that its for sure that when someone talks about one tragedy and other party refers to another tragedy (supposedly committed by other camp) just to deviate people from current tragedy, its definitely 'insensitivity'. At least, condemnation for any heinous crime be absolute to start with.
Its not about Taliban or Peshawer incident only. I have given examples of target killing in Karachi and victims being treated as a regular number. Treatment of this by authorities as well as public as 'Nothing extraordinary' as it happens in all big cities of the world.
Then that is simply because people see such incidents everyday and that becomes sort of ordinary thing.
[QUOTE]
I don't know and I won't say whether Mullas are insensitive as a whole, but I must say that its for sure that when someone talks about one tragedy and other party refers to another tragedy (supposedly committed by other camp) just to deviate people from current tragedy, its definitely 'insensitivity'. At least, condemnation for any heinous crime be absolute to start with.
[/QUOTE]
That is definitely insensitivity but only then if you ask me to condemn and I dont condemn or I am supposed to condemn but dont condemn.
I don't know but I observed (might be incorrect) that people in over-populated area are more insensitive than less populated areas. Might be because in over-populated areas people have to fight for every resource available and they become oversensitive :)
I don't know but I observed (might be incorrect) that people in over-populated area are more insensitive than less populated areas. Might be because in over-populated areas people have to fight for every resource available and they become oversensitive :)
Interesting. When I went to New York, I was amazed at the rudeness on the highway...and I wonder what contributes to that? When there are too many people, do they become immune to the needs of others? Us it the weather? What is it? In my state, I went to the post office a few weeks back and there was an scrawny, elderly woman sitting hunched over outside the building. Almost all the people that had to pass by her....whether they were exiting or entering the post office or coming from another direction....stopped to check if she was okay. I saw several people do this. When I was in Times Square (NY) there was a beggar sitting outside a store holding a sign of need....and he looked up at the people with an expression of disapproving astonishment at how...sooo many folks walked past him and nobody glanced his way. I didn't see any other beggars in the area and if there were, they were not as obvious as him. I've a feeling that he might have received more attention if he were in my state..Or at least maybe more people would have looked at him if not helped him. Maybe I'm wrong.
