What is the Khilafah?

What is the Khilafah

  1. What is Dar al-Islam?

Dar al-Islam is the land where Islamic Law is implemented in all matters of life and ruling and whose security is maintained in the name of Islam even if its citizens are non-Muslims.

  1. What is Dar al-Kufr?

Dar al-Kufr is the land where Kufr laws are implemented in matters of life and whose security is maintained in the name of Kufr even if all its citizens are Muslims. This is because the criterion of a region being Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Kufr are the laws that are implemented there, and the security by which it is protected, the criterion is not the religion of its citizens.

  1. Which Muslim Countries today are Dar al-Islam?

Out of the Muslim countries of today, there is not a single country or state where Islamic laws are exclusively implemented in ruling and life’s affairs; therefore all of them are considered Dar al-Kufr although their citizens are Muslims.

  1. What is The Muslims Duty towards His Country?

Islam makes it a duty upon all Muslims to work to change their countries from Dar al-Kufr to Dar al-Islam, and this can be achieved by establishing the Islamic State i.e. the Khilafah, and by electing a Khaleefah and taking a bay’ah on him that he will rule by the Word of Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) i.e. he will implement Islamic laws in the country where the Khilafah has been established. Then the Muslims should work with the Khilafah to combine the rest of the Islamic countries with it, hence the countries will become Dar al-Islam and they will then carry Islam to the world through invitation and jihad.

  1. What is the Khilafah

The Khilafah is the global leadership for all the Muslims in the world. Its role is to establish the laws of the Islamic Shari‘ah and to carry the da‘wah of Islam to the world.

  1. Is the Khilafah known as anything else?

The Khilafah is also known as the Imamah, both terms have the same meaning. Several sound ahadith mention them with the same meaning, neither of the two terms has ever differed in meaning in any Shari‘ah text i.e. the Qur’an or the Sunnah of the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam), these being the only Shari‘ah sources. It is not compulsory to hold to the term of Khilafah or Imamah, but rather it is compulsory to hold to the meaning of the term.

  1. Is the establishment of a Khaleefah an obligation upon all Muslims in the world?

The establishment of a Khaleefah is an obligation upon all Muslims in the world. Performing this duty, like any of the duties prescribed by Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) upon the Muslims, is an urgent obligation in which there can be no choice or complacency. Negligence in performing this duty is one of the greatest sins, for which Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) punishes severely.

  1. What is the evidence that the appointment of a Khaleefah is obligatory?

The evidence that the appointment of a Khaleefah is obligatory upon all Muslims is in the Sunnah and the Ijma‘a (consensus) of the Sahabah.

  1. What is the evidence from the Sunnah

As for the Sunnah, Nafi‘a reported saying: “‘Umar said to me that he heard the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) saying: Whoso takes off his hand from allegiance to Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) will meet Him (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) on the Day of Resurrection without having any proof for him, and whoso dies whilst there was no bay‘ah (allegiance or a pledge) on his neck (to a Khaleefah), he dies a death of jahilliyah.” So the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) made it compulsory upon every Muslim to have a bay‘ah on his neck, and described whoever dies without a bay‘ah on his neck that he dies a death of jahilliyah. The bay‘ah cannot be for anyone except the Khaleefah, and the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) made it obligatory upon every Muslim to have on his neck a bay‘ah to a Khaleefah. Yet he did not make it an obligation upon every Muslim to give bay‘ah to a Khaleefah. The duty is the existence of a bay‘ah on the neck of every eligible Muslim, i.e. the existence of a Khaleefah who accordingly deserves a bay‘ah upon the neck of every Muslim. So it is the presence of the Khaleefah which places a bay‘ah on the neck of every Muslim, whether the Muslim gave a bay‘ah to him in person or not.

Therefore, this hadith of the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) is an evidence that the appointment of the Khaleefah is an obligation and not a proof that giving the bay‘ah is obligatory. This is so because the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) rebuked the Muslim who has not a bay‘ah on his neck until he dies, not the one who did not give bay‘ah. Hisham ibn ‘Urwa reported on the authority of Abu Saleh on the authority of Abu Hurairah that the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) said: “Leaders will take charge of you after me, where the pious (one) will lead you with his piety and the impious (one) with his impiety, so listen to them and obey them in everything which conforms with the truth. If they act rightly it is for your credit, and if they acted wrongly it is counted for you and against them.” Muslim narrated on the authority of al-A’araj, on the authority of Abu Hurairah, that the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) said: “Behold, the Imam is but a shield from behind whom the people fight and by whom they protect themselves.” Muslim reported on the authority of Abu Hazim, who said: “I accompanied Abu Hurairah for five years and heard him talking of the Prophet’s saying: The Prophets ruled over the children of Israel, whenever a Prophet died another Prophet succeeded him, but there will be no Prophet after me. There will be Khulafa’a and they will number many. They asked: What then do you order us? He said: Fulfil the bay‘ah to them one after the other and give them their due. Surely Allah will ask them about what He entrusted them with.” Ibn ‘Abbas narrated that the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) said: “If anyone sees in his amir something that displeases him let him remain patient, for behold, he who separates himself from the sultan (authority of Islam) by even so much as a hand span and dies thereupon, has died a death of the days of jahilliyah”.

In these ahadith, the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) informs us that leaders will run the affairs of Muslims, and the ahadith include the description of the Khaleefah as a shield, i.e. a protection. So the description of the Imam as a shield is informative of the benefits of the presence of the Imam, thus it is a command for action, because if the information conveyed by Allah (Subhaanahu Wa Ta’Ala) and the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) contained rebuke then it is a command of prohibition, and if it contained praise then it is a command for action. If the ordered action is necessary to implement a hukm shara’i (divine law), or by its negligence a hukm shara’i will be neglected, then this command is decisive.

In these ahadith there is information also that those who run the affairs of Muslims are Khulafa’a, which indicates an order to appoint them. They also include a prohibition for Muslims to separate from the authority, which indicates the obligation upon Muslims to appoint an authority for themselves, i.e. ruling.

Moreover, the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) ordered the Muslims to obey the Khaleefah and to fight those who dispute his authority as Khaleefah, which indicates an order to appoint a Khaleefah and to protect his Khilafah by fighting against whosoever disputes with him. Muslim reported that the Prophet (Salallahu Alaihi Wasalaam) said: “He who pledged allegiance to an Imam giving him the clasp of his hand and the fruit of his heart shall obey him as long as he can, and if another comes to dispute with him you have to strike the neck of that man.” So the command to obey the Imam is an order to establish him, and the command to fight those who dispute with him is an evidence that this command is decisive in maintaining the presence of one Khaleefah.

More points

http://www.gupistan.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74371&highlight=khalifa

discussed so many times before and I think there is a mark differece when Prophet (PBUH) told about Khalifa and now as we have more than 2 billion muslims.. Islam never gave a rigid political structure since Islam had to spread all over the world.. wherether it be Prime minister, Sadar or halifa there is no difference.. voting is ijma..even structure of Govt was always changing with times during the Caliphates of Hazrat Abu Bakr, Umer , Usman and Ali (RA).. concept of Khalifa is termed as the general head of State of Islamic Govt and it was never said that if Islam would hold large areas more than one Khalifas wont be necessary.. and more over since doors of Ijtihad were closed how can we decide about issues of boundries of modern day states, voting of woman etc? There is a big difference what Arabs do and others do.. forcing arab culture and deeming it mandatory upon other muslims as Islam is foolishness.. Islam’s greatness lies in the fact that its so flexible in general terms and rigid in basic beliefs that every nation of the world can adopt it.. it doesnt give much importance to rituals but to form.. just think how can 2 billion muslim give bayt to a single Khalifa!

Why does it have to spread across the world? Why can't it just stay in arabia and the present day muslim countries and blossom. This whole of spreading is what keeps islam from blossoming.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chaltahai: *
Why does it have to spread across the world? Why can't it just stay in arabia and the present day muslim countries and blossom. This whole of spreading is what keeps islam from blossoming.
[/QUOTE]

Chaltahai there is a differece between religions like Christainity, Islam and those like hinduism.. as lower caste hindu or anyone who embrace hinduim can never become high casted or brahmin whatever the person try u wont understand conversion.. people convert in religions where all are considered equal and their worth is due to their good deeds than their birth..

Just like lower class pakistanis as opposed to higher class arbas, eh! PLease stop the pontification, in hand you have the reality..the state of the islamic world we see today..corrupt rulers, bankrupt countries, violent outburst by supposedly pious muslims and then there is this fantasy of Khliafas and a land of milk and honey.

The reality is that as soon as you divinde the world into two camps and in the same vein speak about the need to spread islam, there is going to be friction. You can look at any country in the world today and whereever there is a sizeable muslim minority there are problems. And it is because of this chip on the shoulder of some of the muslims about Dar-al-Islam and Dar-Ul-Kuf'r and need to spread. remove these antequated thinking and no doubt the message of Islam will reach it's supposed intendents. In a manner that proposes secularism, tolerance and inclusion.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chaltahai: *
Just like lower class pakistanis as opposed to higher class arbas, eh! PLease stop the pontification, in hand you have the reality..the state of the islamic world we see today..corrupt rulers, bankrupt countries, violent outburst by supposedly pious muslims and then there is this fantasy of Khliafas and a land of milk and honey.

The reality is that as soon as you divinde the world into two camps and in the same vein speak about the need to spread islam, there is going to be friction. You can look at any country in the world today and whereever there is a sizeable muslim minority there are problems. And it is because of this chip on the shoulder of some of the muslims about Dar-al-Islam and Dar-Ul-Kuf'r and need to spread. remove these antequated thinking and no doubt the message of Islam will reach it's supposed intendents. In a manner that proposes secularism, tolerance and inclusion.
[/QUOTE]

as u have urself poited there are "some" muslims who do that.. vast majority dont :) the problems u have noted are due to some zealots who want to kill any non-muslims but how many muslims u knew back home or here who hold these ideas.. this weakness is due to their personal misinformation and not adherence to Islam's tolerant views.. and this percentage may be far less than found in all other religions.. large majority of muslims in the world are peace loving and wonderful and their preaching is gentle and with logic and its their right to convert non-muslims with their nice attitude even if it annoys u..

Degas: It is humorous to me that think that I care about muslim conversions one way or the other. Just for the record. I say..go crazy..convert every one, I don't care. Just as you said..do it through "nice" means.

This minority you speak of is quite large. If muslims are about 1 billion, would you say there are 10% of these people who do not share your peaceful views? If these people do exist, then it is up the muslims them selves to enlighten their brothers and sisters and we won't have problems in Dar-Ur-Kuf'r. Be it China, Philippines, India, Israel, NYC or Pago Pago.

Secondly, this concept of Khilafah and Islamic rule concerns non-muslims because we have resloved and evolved ourselves to change. We fervently belive that what was written in the 7th century was meant for the 7th century not the 22nd. Part of the problem of lack of capitalism of resources wihtin Islamic lands is their reluctance to let go of the past that proves erroneous in the current world. Be it economic, governance or religion.

AS far as religious tolerance is concern. You can look around..on any continent and tell me..how many large scale conflicts are taking place between democracies and how many hindus and jews are at each others throats or how many Buddhist holy warriors are there.

Salaam.

Most of the regional conflicts today are due to due to political and geographical resources than religion hawkishness though they do come into play in a later sage.. look at Kashmir, Jafna, Palestine, Chechnia and most of Africa.. most lethal suicide bomber terrorist organization in the world is hindu Tamil Tigers by all proposions if u agree it or not .. and how much State terrorism is involved by Govts in kashmir, Palestine and Russia is ur own guess or perception..

Sorry Degas, but in the real world..such displacement of blame simply doesn't wash. Tell that to the chinese in Xinjiang, the people in Kashmir, the people in Phillipines, ISrael, NYC or Nigeria Sudan. Those jackasses in LTTE are terrorists. SO are the jihadis in kashmir, phillipines, xinjiang, palestine, Chechnya, Russia and on and on...hope that clears it up some.

Simple point here made is the brother saying that todays reality cannot be changed to suit Islam. That the 50+ muslim nations cannot be united via the Islamic ruling system and pledge alledgiance to the Khaleefah. Okay now that is haram, Islam dictates that there must be only one Khalifah and to have more than one would be haram, there is a quote of hadrat Umar (ra) about bayah and chose one leader and if another stands to oppose him, chop his head off. We all know even throughout history, that there was only one Amir, Caliph, Sultan, call it what you will it all means the same. Now the issue we must focus towards is can we change the feeling of Nationalism, Patriotism and replace them with Islamic sentiments. I believe this is already the case, when to look to events that took place when the WQar on Islam took place the bombs being thrown on Afghanistan, thousands upon thousands of muslims came to the streets of every major muslim city around the globe to protest. In present day realities we see again these feeling of the muslims ummah rising telling the agent regimes they have place in their lands that do not help America crusade against the muslims of Iraq,

Now the role of the muslims is to carry the Islamic call that will unite the 50+ countries via one Islamic State because the love of Islam out weighs Nationalism, Patriotism or any other bond that is keeping hold of the people. The bond of the Islamic belief is the strongest bond and this united us in the past and inshallah will unite the muslims again and aid us in becomming one UMMAH.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chaltahai: *
Sorry Degas, but in the real world..such displacement of blame simply doesn't wash. Tell that to the chinese in Xinjiang, the people in Kashmir, the people in Phillipines, ISrael, NYC or Nigeria Sudan. Those jackasses in LTTE are terrorists. SO are the jihadis in kashmir, phillipines, xinjiang, palestine, Chechnya, Russia and on and on...hope that clears it up some.
[/QUOTE]

Though I would never agree with tactics of all of the above mentioned organizations since their revenge and method actually complementing the methods of the tyrant State terrorism they are suffering from.. blame also is upon teh Terrorist regimes and in real world u should also blame those.. but sadly u cant since one is ur own motherland!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by F R E S H: *

Simple point here made is the brother saying that todays reality cannot be changed to suit Islam. That the 50+ muslim nations cannot be united via the Islamic ruling system and pledge alledgiance to the Khaleefah. Okay now that is haram, Islam dictates that there must be only one Khalifah and to have more than one would be haram, there is a quote of hadrat Umar (ra) about bayah and chose one leader and if another stands to oppose him, chop his head off. We all know even throughout history, that there was only one Amir, Caliph, Sultan, call it what you will it all means the same. Now the issue we must focus towards is can we change the feeling of Nationalism, Patriotism and replace them with Islamic sentiments. I believe this is already the case, when to look to events that took place when the WQar on Islam took place the bombs being thrown on Afghanistan, thousands upon thousands of muslims came to the streets of every major muslim city around the globe to protest. In present day realities we see again these feeling of the muslims ummah rising telling the agent regimes they have place in their lands that do not help America crusade against the muslims of Iraq,

Now the role of the muslims is to carry the Islamic call that will unite the 50+ countries via one Islamic State because the love of Islam out weighs Nationalism, Patriotism or any other bond that is keeping hold of the people. The bond of the Islamic belief is the strongest bond and this united us in the past and inshallah will unite the muslims again and aid us in becomming one UMMAH.
[/QUOTE]

I never said we should change to suit our modern needs .. we should never change on basic Islamic principles and faith but form of govt is one aspect upon which Islam never gave a strict structure since muslims in world live in tribes, clains , countries and such diverse situations.. so Islam rightly just gave basic qualities of a good leader.. check how rightly guided caliphs changes working of their governments due to changing times.. including selection of a Khalifa.. howcould 50 some muslims nations just join? its not politically and geographically possible.. how would khalifa manage economic and foreign policy problems.. give some method tahn rheotoric how to choose a single person from 2 billion?

Also, as its incumbent on us to help muslims whereever they are suffering its also mandatory to not help where muslims are the actual agressors! just blindly helping someone who is muslim but cruel and unjust is against principles of our religion..

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Degas: *

I never said we should change to suit our modern needs .. we should never change on basic Islamic principles and faith but form of govt is one aspect upon which Islam never gave a strict structure since muslims in world live in tribes, clains , countries and such diverse situations.. so Islam rightly just gave basic qualities of a good leader.. check how rightly guided caliphs changes working of their governments due to changing times.. including selection of a Khalifa.. howcould 50 some muslims nations just join? its not politically and geographically possible.. how would khalifa manage economic and foreign policy

[/QUOTE]

The structure of the Islamic ruling system:

The ruling system in the Islamic state is built on seven pillars, they are:

1 - The Khaleefah (Head of state), and he has the mandatory powers to appoint the personnel of the rest of the ruling system except the Council of Shura.

2 - The Council of Shura (consultation) also known as the Council of the Ummah, the members are Muslims and non-Muslims, but non-Muslim members are only consulted in matters related to their own affairs.

3 - The Khaleefah's assistants (the delegated assistants and the executive assistants).

4 - The administrative systems (finance, education, commercial etc..)

5 - The Walis

6 - The judges (the judges of Mathalim, the supreme judge, the judge of the Hisba.

7 - The armed forces (police and security forces).

The whole of these pillars constitute the executive body of the Islamic state, the Messenger of Allah (SAW) established it in Madina, and the Khaleefahs followed his tradition after him.

One of the distinctive features of the Islamic state is that it is a state that has no fixed borders, for it is universal bringing people together under its wing whenever possible by way of Jihad, and taking them out of the darkness and into the light of Islam, saving them from the claws of the manmade systems and integrating them in the rule of Allah, without however coercing them to embrace Islam for there is no compulsion in the deen, Allah (SWT) says:

"There is no compulsion in the deen...."

So are you saying Islamic rules with regards to ruling are made by man? That the rules evolve according to the reality?

Neither is true, Allah (swt) revealed the Qur’an 1400 years ago through his messenger (saw). The messenger (saw) set the premises for us to follow especially in ruling as he (saw) established Dar al-Hijrah (Islamic State) in Al-Medina (Yathrib). The deen of Islam is complete; the only rigid laws in Islam are those that fall under the permissible or Mandoobaat actions.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Kosser_M: *

So are you saying Islamic rules with regards to ruling are made by man? That the rules evolve according to the reality?

** Islamic rules with regard to ruling are not made by man.. we have been advised to chose but method can be any .. say hundred thousand chose today thru internet rather than show of hands! **

Neither is true, Allah (swt) revealed the Qur’an 1400 years ago through his messenger (saw). The messenger (saw) set the premises for us to follow especially in ruling as he (saw) established Dar al-Hijrah (Islamic State) in Al-Medina (Yathrib). The deen of Islam is complete; the only rigid laws in Islam are those that fall under the permissible or Mandoobaat actions.

When Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) created an Islamic state in Madina it catered all the needs of muslims at the very time and even made many changes as time passed.. there are certainly no strict rules regarding structure of Govt..one can see they even included jews as same ummah as muslims but later changed it.. we can make any structure whose rules are according to Quran and sunnah... with ijmah and ijtihad..

[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Kosser_M: *

The structure of the Islamic ruling system:

The ruling system in the Islamic state is built on seven pillars, they are:

1 - The Khaleefah (Head of state), and he has the mandatory powers to appoint the personnel of the rest of the ruling system except the Council of Shura.

2 - The Council of Shura (consultation) also known as the Council of the Ummah, the members are Muslims and non-Muslims, but non-Muslim members are only consulted in matters related to their own affairs.

3 - The Khaleefah's assistants (the delegated assistants and the executive assistants).

4 - The administrative systems (finance, education, commercial etc..)

5 - The Walis

6 - The judges (the judges of Mathalim, the supreme judge, the judge of the Hisba.

7 - The armed forces (police and security forces).

The whole of these pillars constitute the executive body of the Islamic state, the Messenger of Allah (SAW) established it in Madina, and the Khaleefahs followed his tradition after him.

One of the distinctive features of the Islamic state is that it is a state that has no fixed borders, for it is universal bringing people together under its wing whenever possible by way of Jihad, and taking them out of the darkness and into the light of Islam, saving them from the claws of the manmade systems and integrating them in the rule of Allah, without however coercing them to embrace Islam for there is no compulsion in the deen, Allah (SWT) says:

"There is no compulsion in the deen...."
[/QUOTE]

This is the basic structure of any govt..even Govt of Paisitan follows that.. Actually permanent armed forces were established by Hazrat Umer (RA) and not Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as Islamic state expanded .. as well as treasury with large revenues flowing in.. 7 . Slavery was slowly abolished.. Intodays world there are so many other departments along with these like environment and water management that never surfaces at that time..

What about woman voting in this structure..

Goverment of Pakistan follows America not Islam.

Pakistan kah matlab kyaa joo kahee gah amreekah!!

Welll not really, it's not what America tell's them to do.. Musharaf plays a very nice political game with them, which for few people who dont understand it think , pakistan is following guidelines given by America.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fadi_ali: *
Welll not really, it's not what America tell's them to do.. Musharaf plays a very nice political game with them, which for few people who dont understand it think , pakistan is following guidelines given by America.
[/QUOTE]

Which political game is he playing?

Hear and obey my masters.

Jump when he says jump.

My name is Busharraf?

Thanks for the information