what is the difference between

Society Religion & Philosophy
1

a bad mouthing individual and a quiet individual?

one of education, right?

so, what would be the distinctiveness between a person who can answer things directly and honestly, versus an individual who can not speak up, FROM THE HEART?

2

Re: what is the difference between

In the book “Seven Theories of Human Nature” B. F. Skinner, a Harvard psychology professor, believed that humans are completely programmable via classical conditioning methods. A newborn baby can be conditioned to become a doctor, lawyer, or serial killer depending on its environment.

So according to Skinner it maybe just the classical programming but i personally differ, not on medical or scientific reasons but purely bcos of personal instincts. I think there is much more then the conditions and educations… i still believe it will depend on a person to person… there might be something in the DNA too but still something unique of the person him/herself.

:bravo:

Why is it mana for girls to talk?
3

Re: what is the difference between

dont know yar

4

Re: what is the difference between

Dushwari , I think it all depends on wat sort person he/she is..Mostly that and secondly comes the point that wat sort of close knot situation he /she has with the person being spoken too. I personally think that people who play mind games where they'll say one thing while their meaning and also their body language is telling you something else are nothing else but coward. These khalakiyaan only can take em so far, sooner or later they do fall right on their face....btw am I off topic now:D

5

Re: what is the difference between

environ theory makes sense to me, absolutely.
it is valid in the research lit as well.
as well as Amber said, the person who is other side, has to be present and fully alert of the situation, in order for her or him to honorably face or face off with the next person.
if human predatory or possessive nature has to do with the preservation of selfhood, self esteem and consistent autonomy in establishing the boundaries for interactive motions based on selfish cleverness vs. honesty and parsimony in exposé, then how come emotional aspect is delivered to be subdued, how come one side is less concerned than the other and both harbor the sense of doubt for the other, because they have lead each other to become doubtful of each other?

what resolution can be there for a turning point, whose prelude was so weak?
meaning,
when the epitome of the situation is charged with the reactionary clusters of
human emotions ( which by themselves, are very powerful motivators - the mind consults the hearts and the heart relays back to the mind - the circuitry is circuitous, for sure, even then, it is pathway oriented), then how can you evaluate the true type from the fake type?

if the brain and the heart are in sync, then the logical must precede the illogical! i.e. matter over mind should equal mind over matter
heart must become one with the mind

only then, a structure to the function of the decision can be based on sound level and the area of the contextual factors can be laid out in the format of a paradigm in a fashion such that the loose ends are captured within, the sorting is done, within, as well as the unaccountable is accounted for.

makes sense?
hence, something coming straight from heart, must be said accurately - and must be filtered through the processor of the human brain - that utilizes the faculties of reasoning and judgment.

now, they themselves, have to be impartial and for that the balance between the emotional and the reasoned parts of the whole must be equivalent of the whole.
a simple metaphor or analogy will be that of a lap top - u turn in on with the intention to use it.
u make use of it - typing - searching on the web, and saving information for future references, and then you sign out and turn the machine off.
simple script or procedure to this task.

yet, when emotions, decisions, judgments that come between the two - all are working, then, human mind is not able to extract the unsealed, until it becomes self -evident in nature (& it is held consistent) , as in the case of the honest vs. that of the unsure of his /her own self.

6

Re: what is the difference between

Wrong.
Could be ignorance as well.

7

Re: what is the difference between

wth…:confused: i swear, the last time i looked at this thread, there were atleast 3 pages

How to Annoy Feminist Women!
How to Annoy Feminist Women!
8

Re: what is the difference between

really, does the world think, that it can mull over the voices of people just like this?:)

maybe, cheetah, you did not visit this at all or are confusing this with another thread?

you were and are right, though in saying that in stead of education , it can very well be, ineducation or ignorance.

How to Annoy Feminist Women!
9

Re: what is the difference between

alot of difference . a bad mouthing individual not only hurts the other person , but also losses his space , whereas a quiet person does not at least hurt any one

10

Re: what is the difference between

Peace Sister

If bad mouth = a
If quiet = b
If truth speaker = c
If not speak the heart = d

Then we have people who are:

ac > bad mouth truth speaker
bd > quiet not speak the heart

But we can also have:

bc > quiet truth speaker
ad > bad mouth not speak the heart

ac and bd are not better than each other.
bc is the best
but ... ad is the worst

11

Re: what is the difference between

ad is not the worst

12

Re: what is the difference between

pshah
how can you have such inequality in these 'equations'?
and then attempt to prove that two together, even through totally diff attributes, are presented to be in sync. howcome?
dushwari

13

Re: what is the difference between

Peace Dushwari

Perhaps you are right about the inequality ... but I am trying to represent the contradictory nature of humankind. Sort of does that doesn't it?

No ... however unlikely they may seem to be ... we get plenty of well educated idiots and a fair share of humble and considerate simpletons.

In plain English therefore:

ac = One who talks without wisdom, arrogant about his knowledge
bd = Recessive and stands for being accepted by society rather than standing up for what is right.

bc = Knows the truth and listens to people, telling the facts in a wise and thought out manner.

ad = One who indulges in kufr - Is rude and obnoxious, knows the truth but denies it openly.

14

Re: what is the difference between

psyah.

now i know. :)
doomed are the ad types.

thanks for clarifying.

15

Re: what is the difference between

wrong... :-)

its the ignorance and lack of respect for other's feelings.

16

Re: what is the difference between

^ thank you xenophanez. you're so correct - when emotions are discounted, all of it is wasted.

& that error on the error-maker's part is engulfed into some justification which is unjustifiable at best.