What does PM Sharif do next ?

Good Suggestions for Pm and Federal Cabinet …

**
What does PM Sharif do next ?
**

Mosharraf ZaidiSaturday, October 25, 2014

http://images.thenews.com.pk/25-10-2014/Opinion/10-25-2014_280355_l_akb.jpg

The good news is that Tahirul Qadri has left D-Chowk. The bad news? The bad news is also that Tahirul Qadri has left D Chowk. It is good news because nothing was going to come of the camping trip that Qadri was leading. His followers deserve better than to be sitting in the cold through the upcoming cold winter months.

It is bad news because now that they have packed up, the prime minister and his core PML-N party leadership may decide to breathe a sigh of relief. Any notions they may have had, of needing to change how PM Sharif runs the country, may be leaving along with the supporters of the Pakistan Awami Tehreek.

We have spent the better part of two months now focusing on all the mistakes PM Sharif has made and is making. His weaknesses and limitations have been exposed in an unprecedented manner thanks to the tenacity of PAT and PTI supporters. The larger question about whether this episode has been good for the country is debatable.

The long marches and dharnas and jalsas that began on August 14 this year will go down as being great for Pakistan if the sum total of their impact results in a dramatically reformed PML-N and a major change in how PM Sharif lives every minute of this remaining time as prime minister.

Unlike Imran Khan, or any candidate the Bhutto-Zardari political enterprise may have in mind, Nawaz Sharif can win the office of prime minister without needing a coalition. The margin of victory Sharif enjoyed in the May 2013 elections, and the surge of new PML-N members soon afterwards, helped cement a solid majority at the centre, aligned with a totally dominant majority in Punjab. For most federalists, this is seen as a bad thing. But that is not because the formula itself is problematic. It is because Nawaz Sharif keeps making the same mistakes over and over again.

For now, let’s stop being retrospective and complaining. How can PM Sharif salvage his term and become a leader of the stature of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and possibly Mohammad Ali Jinnah? In other words, how can PM Sharif transform the fortunes of Pakistan?

For starters, it is important to recognise that it is not too late. Even if he takes another month to awaken from his slumber, he will have a solid thirty months before elections in 2018. Second, it is important to recognise that he doesn’t need to look far for talent; his party still commands among the best political and technical talent among Pakistan’s mainstream parties. Third, it is vital to acknowledge that the civil-military divide that defines Pakistani governance in the aggregate is of a very different nature today than it was in the 1990s. In summary, PM Sharif has the time, the people, and the political space to perform miracles.

What about Imran Khan and the PTI ? There is nothing stopping the dharna from continuing. It allows young people to let off steam, and some older people still yearning for their youth to pretend that they represent change. Let’s not kid ourselves. Khan is the most electrifying political figure in Pakistan. But let’s not kid ourselves. He has played more than the cards he was dealt, and the resilience of the Sharif has to exasperate even the fighting spirit of the great Kaptaan. If PM Sharif decides to change how he governs, no matter what the Kaptaan does, he will be unable to unseat him before 2018. But that is a big if.

What should PM Sharif do? He has to start the process of rescuing his term by starting from himself. He needs to take his job much more seriously. He has to change his working hours and working style. Unlike former president Asif Ali Zardari, PM Sharif does not start the day in the afternoon, but he is not a very early riser either. The real problem is that after 7pm or so, PM Sharif retires for the evening. Part of this is informed by his keenness to watch television talk shows. Part of it is informed by an inexplicable attitude of passiveness.

The entire federal government is somnambulant because no federal secretary is worried about a 3am call from the prime minister. It doesn’t ever happen. The prime minister of Pakistan should be working 14 to 18 hours a day. If he did, so would the entire federal government, and so would at least parts of the provincial governments too. In short, at least in working hours, the elder Sharif has to be more like the younger Sharif.

If the PM is going to work really, really hard, he will need a team of professionals to handle his affairs. Currently, he has a small group of highly talented and energetic officers who manage the PM Office. However, he invests incredible degrees of personal trust and affection with those he is surrounded by. This means a personalisation of policy that would be dangerous even in a medium-sized firm, what to talk of a massive country in the throes of multiple crises.

The PM needs to have people look him in the eye and tell him he is wrong. Often. He needs to have people challenge those near him who offer advice that is meant to enrich individuals or businesses. He needs to mix professional government bureaucrats from the DMG/PAS with some from other groups, some from the provincial services, and some from outside government altogether. No matter how difficult it may be, the PM has to surround himself with more people who display a complete absence of personal reverence to him. In short, the PM Office needs a major overhaul.

Once he cleans up his own office, he needs to empower and energise his cabinet. Despite having a stable of top political and technical people at his disposal he has allowed too much policy drift. Some of the problem will be solved when he spends more time at work, and becomes more hands on, instead of letting junior bureaucrats pretend to run the country. However, he needs to realise the need to separate personal loyalty from professional competence.

Has this government been good at messaging and agenda-setting? Have civil-military relations improved? Is an economic strategy entirely contingent on subsidised capital inflows a good one? The answers to these are obvious. No, no and no. Should the PM really be exposing his three closest confidantes to the challenges of the ministries of information, defence and finance? The answer to that question is obvious too.

Finally, the prime minister, given his parliamentary strength has a chance to construct a really powerful national narrative without ceding very much power. To do this, he needs to ensure that his cabinet has people that speak with different accents. Both his inner and outer circle lack Pakhtun, Sindhi and Baloch voices. Would it hurt to reach out to smaller parties? Benevolence never hurt anyone, except the really insecure.

Today, over 70 days since the dharnas began, the PM is still standing. The time for paralysis and inaction is over. It is time for the PM to lead. If he does not, what remains in D-Chowk could well evolve into something entirely more menacing. The PTI’s limitations have been a blessing for the prime minister, but his limitations must not become a curse for Pakistan.

The writer is an analyst and commentator.

www.mosharrafzaidi.com

Re: What does PM Sharif do next ?

Prime minister Nawaz Sharif will keep up the charade, what else is he to do? Actually admit that he never has, and never will benefit Pakistan? That he is a fraud, and is appointing known criminals and corrupt family members alike to important positions? This prime minister is a coward and a fraud, lets stop this session of pretend play, and start calling things for what they actually are. We had a pretend play session for five years under the rule of Zardari, we don't need another one.

Mr Sharif appoints known criminal Hanif Abbasi as chairman of the Metrobus Project Committee, and no one raises an eyebrow. Thats where we are at.

Re: What does PM Sharif do next ?

Dear Prime Minister

Dr Farrukh SaleemSunday, October 26, 2014

http://images.thenews.com.pk/26-10-2014/Opinion/10-26-2014_280585_l_akb.jpg

Capital Suggestion

Sir, democracy is not under any sort of threat and neither is your government. Your government is secure and so is democracy. Yes, your style of governance is under attack and the real origin of that attack is Pakistani voters. The only power that can bring down the PML-N government is the PML-N. No more mistakes, please.

**Sir, you are our democratically elected prime minister. A mere 17 months ago, the PML-N bagged a total of 14.8 million votes; 7.2 million more votes than polled by the PTI. To be certain, a victory with a wholesome margin of 7.2 million votes is not rigged, cannot be rigged.
**

Sir, your idea of setting up Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for ministries and their ministers is a superb idea. Your idea of importing the Citizens Feedback Model (CFM) from Punjab is also a superb idea.

Sir, there are four ailments that have in the past eroded the legitimacy of elected civilian governments. The ailments are: a high incidence of civilian corruption, gross misgovernance, electoral fraud and extreme civil unrest. These four ailments provide opportunities – openings for the military to intervene (in 1977, the turnout was said to be 63 percent of which Zulfikar Bhutto claimed a 60 percent share for the PPP). **No more mistakes, please.
**

Sir, the army high command will protect two kinds of interests: what the army perceives as national interests and the military’s institutional interests. The military’s institutional interests fall under six broad categories: military’s institutional autonomy, internal unity, internal discipline, access to resources, prestige and military’s foreign policy narratives. A strong army means a strong Pakistan.

Sir, the only existential threat to Pakistan is from India (all non-state threats are by definition non-existential threats). Our trade policy with India has to be a subset of our national security strategy (and not the other way round).

Sir, Pakistan’s political reality is changing – changing fast. To begin with, voters have begun to demand their political rights. Next, voters are beginning to vote or reject on the basis of performance, not slogans. Next, voters must be asked as to how they want their taxes to be spent. The metro bus may not be the answer.

Sir, political capital is about three things: trust of voters, goodwill of voters and influence over other political and non-political actors. You had accumulated tons of political capital as a consequence of the 2013 election. In my humble opinion, you have wasted almost all of your political capital fighting inconsequential battles.

Sir, this country is going nowhere without deep-rooted electoral and economic reforms. To be certain, the principal prerequisite to reforms is a political leader with tons of political capital.

Sir, having lost almost all of your political capital you now have three options. **One, transform your style of governance (in order to accumulate political capital). Two, limp, lurch, bumble and stumble towards 2018. Three, call early elections.
**

The writer is a columnist based in Islamabad. Email:[email protected]
Twitter: @**saleem**farrukh