What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Mr. Popat – That’s the problem – If the Ahmadis here had the guts to say what the real stance of their jamaat’s position was on non-Ahmadis , the thread would not gone beyond page one.

All the Ahmadis here were not speaking the truth rather were being deceptive. They were trying to show nice tolerant face of ahmadiyyat. Only when the references were given from your books on the real stance of Ahmadis, only ** kchughtai** had the guts to grudgingly admit that Ahmadis considered non-Ahmadis as Kaffirs.

We don’t need to hear from PR department of your jamaat what you think of us – we can see it from your authentic books.

We don’t really care or worry what you think of us in the least. But don’t be hypocrites when telling us what you think of us. We don't mince our words when we put forward our stance towards your jamaat - and we back it with references from the Blessed Quran and the Noble ahadith!

We were just teaching you to say the truth which is in your books – not tell us what you like us to hear.

We know what your beliefs are!

Only if you were really honest in relating your jamaat's real stance towards us nothing would have been ridiculous!

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

ibn sadique,

It is very unfair of you that you think we are deceiving you. In my first post, I said whatever your scholars think Muslims will be called if they reject Jesus a.s upon his second coming, is the answer to the question.

I still say that you're committing kufr. Thats up to you if you think you're not. And yes, being committing kufr doesnt mean you cannot be a Muslim, since you proclaim to be a Muslim, and we have no right to call you non-muslim.

Then I explain to you there are different ways in which the term kufr or kafir has been used in ahadith, one hadith that I can think of is if a Muslim knowingly miss a prayer commits kufr.

All else aside, I ask you, what will you call a person who will reject Jesus a.s when he comes back ?? I need a straight forward answer to that. Let's say a 'Muslim' rejects Jesus a.s. What is he now ? a Muslim ? a non-muslim? a kafir? .. ?

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

As per the books quoted it is clearly stated that you consider mainstream muslims as kaffir(not merely some one commiting kuffar), why twist this basic aqeedah of yours?

Have a look at

Anwar e khilafat/mirza mahmood

Tazkira ilhamaat/mirza ghulam ahmed

Aiina Sadaqat /Mirza bashir ibn mirza ghulam

Would any one of you mind explaining these quotes?


Restored attachments:

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Sorry but idon't understand, if you people don't believe in Hazrat Isa (peace be upon him) 's return, then why should you keep asking the same question again and again that, what would you call a person who doesn't believe in Hazrat Isa's return?????. If one does not believe in a certain thing and belief, they never use it as examples. But if you continue asking this it means, you do believe in it to a certain extent.

Kind of a standard thing someone is trying to use again and again. Or if you don't think this way then come up with another argument, question, something from your own set of beliefs. Don't borrow things from here and there.

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Mr.Popat You are going round in circles and repeating same things again and again – And I think the problem lies in you not reading other’s posts well or half-heartily. All that you have raised in this post has been done with!

Here we go again: - This time read everything well – word by word, please.

I am quoting your side – and see that they still use the word Muslim for non-Ahmadis– granting a status of Muslims (just about) – say something like defective or second hand Muslims who are committing kufr but not Kaffirs

Compare the above with stance of your jamaat stated by Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad son and second successor of your prophet.

How can someone be kaffir and out of pale of Islam and yet be sort of Muslim!

(3) the belief that all those so-called Muslims who have not entered into his Bai‘at formally, wherever they may be, are kuffar and outside the pale of Islam, even though they may not have heard the name of the Promised Messiah as.

"The article was elaborately entitled A Muslim is one who believes in all the messengers of God'. The title itself is sufficient to show that the article was not meant to prove merely thatthose who did not accept the Promised Messiah were deniers of the Promised Messiah'. Its object rather was to demonstrate that those who did not believe in the Promised Messiah were not Muslims."** A’inah-i Sadaqat** (pp. 135-136)

"Regarding the main subject of my article, I wrote that as we believed the Promised Messiah to be one of the prophets of God, we could not possibly regard his deniers as Muslims." A’inah-i Sadaqat (pp. 137-138)

"not only are those deemed to be Kafirs who openly style the Promised Messiah as Kafir, and those who although they do not style him thus, decline still to accept his claim, but even those who, in their hearts, believe the Promised Messiah to be true, and do not even deny him with their tongues, but hesitate to enter into his Bai`at, have here been adjudged to be Kafirs." A’inah-i Sadaqat (pp. 139 -140)

"And lastly, it was argued from a verse of the Holy Quran that such people as had failed to recognise the Promised Messiah as a Rasul even if they called him a righteous person with their tongues, were yet veritable Kafirs." A’inah-i Sadaqat (p. 140)

veritable Kafirs” are “pakkay kafir” in the original Urdu book

Can you label pakkay kafirs as sort of Muslims???!

Look at your response - Instead of answering directly you were posing a question so that we can come to the required answer. You were hiding behind a question.

That was answered – Quoting myself again - Okay I take Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a liar and a Charlatan and consider myself a Muslim. Will you still consider my a Muslim according to teachings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?

You have not being reading well – that too was answered

Please answer this question to best of your integrity:

I take Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a liar and a Charlatan and consider myself a Muslim. Will you still consider my a Muslim according to teachings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?

Please answer directly no riddles and going round in circles; this has been pointed out to you earlier by the thread opener.

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

^jhoot kay pair kahan. you are wasting your time around.

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Here is what I have to say on this matter when Isa (AS) will return ...

The rejectors of Isa (AS) may still be Muslim if they have heard news of him (AS) from a second or third source and they want to be sure before they accept him ... But according to our beliefs the persona and miracle of Isa (AS) will be so strong that upon him seeing them or them seeing him ... not just Muslims but many people especially from Ahl-al-Kitab will recognise him and accept him (AS) and that is his miracle supported by many ahadith.

This whole rigmarole of argumentation is not my understanding of the sunnah of Mahdi (RA) or Isa (AS) ... they will be too busy to write books and engage in polemics ... this in itself is a sign that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was not who he claimed to be ... So basically if a person is sincere then I trust they will be given the light of reason and guidance enough to recognise and readily accept the Mahdi and Masih ... when they arrive ...

... Prophets just don't write books ...

The rejectors of the Masih (AS) will only be those who have been spiritually blinded and working directly for the Dajjalic elements. Our apocalyptic world view is drastically at loggerheads from the Ahmadi position ... when the true Masih (AS) comes we will not be asking questions in debate ... we will be offering him (AS) our services, following him (AS) wherever he shall take us and when it is his (AS)'s time to rest ... he (AS) will be laid beside RasoolAllah (SAW) at the roza in Madinah - And there is none of the People of the Book, but will believe in him before he dies ...

To me this means before Isa (AS) actually dies - all people of scripture - this includes Muslims, Christians, Jews and all these sects who follow the core scriptures will believe in him (AS) ... His (AS) death shall not come until the legacy of the Abrahamic religions all accept him (AS) ... excluding the insincere - who are outcast from this equation.

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

I know brother - let's see what he comes with this time. You know it - I know it - we all know it - I think he knows it too - He will come back with same thing again ;0

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

It is permissible for Muslims to visit graves, to take the inhabitants of the Graves as means to Allah Most Merciful. This is a practice of this Ummah in its entirety

Sajda to other then Allah carries two implications 1) it is shirk, if done with the intention of Worship 2) it is Haram, if done with the intention of respect

Allah Most Merciful did order the angels to prostrate to Adam Salam Alaih and this is not Shirk

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Let me solve all the life problems you guys are having because of us:

Question). What do ahmadis call mainstream muslims?

Ans). NUTS!

I hope you will have a good night sleep after many sleepless nights.

sweet dreams.

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

Peace Psyah,

You are all over the place as usual. started with “what we think of others”, went on to question our stance on tauheed, then hoped on to “finality of prophet hood” then beliefs about 2nd coming. Seriously, What is wrong with you guys. Out of job or something. We don’t matter to you. You don’t matter to us but still there is something about us that keeps you in the loop. really weird.

I will try to be very brief here. We don’t reject holy prophet’s hadith of “La nabiya baadi”. show me where we have said that we don’t believe in it. I didn’t talk about Quran wrt to finality. I gave my answer in a very general and shortest possible way but you didn’t read it.
There are plenty of in depth discussions on this topic by our jammat. If you are interested, I can give you the link. There is absolutely no blanket denial. How does coming back of Isa (as) of bani israel not violate the sealed door? The childish stance that it means that no prophet will be born after him is ridiculous. He is not even from the ummat of holy prophet (pbuh) so his coming is actually a blatant violation of the “khatm-e-nabuwat”. As I stated earlier, it is prophet Muhammad (pbuh)'s rule till the end of times. Any reformer or mahdi after the holy prophet (pbuh) has to be his Khalifa, from this khair-e-ummat as Quran states in 24:56)

"Allah has promised to those among you who believe and do good works that He will surely make them Successors in the earth, as He made Successors from among those who were before them; …

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Rainydays,

Well, we believe in Masih (as) to come in this ummat of course that is why there is mahdi and masih in the person of Hazrat Mirza ghulam Ahmed (as). did that ring any bell? No? ok
Both of us believe in coming of mahdi and masih in later days but you believe it will be the same Isa ibn mariam while we say that Isa(as) has already passed away and a person from among this ummah will come [Imamikum minkum.. your imam from within you]

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

We all know what goes on at mazaars is more than simple duaa, people perform sajday and all manners of absurd things there which are Haram and Shirk.
As for your last statement that Allah ordered angels to perform sajda to Adam (AS) .... read your 2nd statement that sajda to anyone else besides Allah is either haram or shirk. Naozobillah Allah ordered angels to commit haram and shirk.

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

Quoted for truth.

If I got a dollar for every square-circle argument that psyah makes, I’d be millionaire. This guy thinks long posts and sheer persistance passes for sound arguments. And the self-rightiousness in his posts is nauseating.

I have not the energy nor the interest and neither the time to argue over stuff that I know isn’t going to be resolved on an online board even if the discussion went to 50 pages. Nobody ever gives an inch especially when they are convinced that they are on the right path and are doing God’s work. I guess that is a commentary on religious debate in general. There is what-aboutism abound.

For people who are quite sure of our heresy, you guys seem quite obsessed with us and our opinions.

A person who spends a lot of time obsessing over other people’s beliefs is not normal and is probably a bigot.

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

Personally I have seen desperation at Mazaars, I have seen Kissing of the Graves. Both these acts are objectionable but not totally impermissible

I was not desperate - because Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala has filled my udders full
I was not kissing the Graves - because i have no love to give

What i saw was some Dunya Dari - they were probably asking for dunya dari things. This is also disliked but not impermissible and we have to admit this even when our own udders are full
The others were like me, whom Allah Subhanahu had given the comforts of Dunya, and we just stood there in the presence (company) of an Awliya

I have no doubt that those around me were Believers in La Illaha Ilallah. I have no doubt that those around me knew the Inhabitant of the Grave was a slave of Allah The One and I have no doubt those around me knew any possible Ilah would not be confined to a Grave

In my opinion none of that was Shirk, this is the Rehma of reciting the Kalima, and has nothing to do with individual Knowledge

Everywhere we go we have built Mazaars, although another opinion is that it is impermissible to build around graves. What has prevailed in the Mainstream is the building of Mazaars. So as you can see from this we have not felt the visitation of Mazaars is Shirk

This is the general background of the situation from my pov without any proofs which may or may not be Hujjat for you. If your opinion, regarding it being Haram and Shirk, was your religious opinion and one that is shared by your community then i would like to know more about it. This is a subject that really interests me

Sajda was even allowed in all the previous Ummats. Just because it is Haram in our Ummah does not actually mean any more then that. Another example from the Quran about Heaven : …**rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink…
**
You originally showed a picture of Tahir Ul Qadri for your example, so allow Tahir Ul Qadri to let you know about the position of Sajda of reverence in relation to the Sunnah of the Messenger Sallallahu Alaihi wa Alehi wa Sallam


**
**

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

Striking Similarities …

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

Yes mizar parasti is shirk. If someone visits mizar just to visit it, like visiting a dead's grave that is one thing, that might be okay. And we muslims were told not to construct mausoleums on graves. Making prayers to dead on graves or anywhere etc is all haram and shirk. You want something from Allah, pray to and ask Allah.

And Nauzubillah the way the poster obaid :

I just don't want to believe somebody is so vociferously negating Quranic ayats. Just look at your words. Guys this alone shows how much someone believes in Allah's word. That was sajda of praise and respect to Allah the Magnificent for having created such wonderful creation. And when Allah is ordering the angels then what other question is left behind? Doesn't Allah know more about shirk and what's haram than humans do.

Very obsessed. Bohat.

You said you believe in Prophets' laws and ahadees(you said right), that automatically implies your masih did as well.

The ilm , that there will come a masih and mahdi(for us muslims mahi and masih are two different people) was passed down to muslims only through ahadees, only through ahadees. And ahadees directly state, Hazrat Isa's (as) return, he will not be Prophet this time but will come as Imam, and the prophecy about birth of imam mahdi. Hazrat isa will return and Imam mahdi will be born.

So when all these concepts came down to us only through ahadees and they are so explicit about these two individuals . Someone who gets up and claims i am mahdi and imam too , how does he in the first place know about these prophecies.

What his source of information is. There is no new book revealed down on him and did he make any such claim?? If he didn't get this concept from Quran and hadees then what was his source, from where he got this knowledge?
If hadees is the source of information, then they are very explicit about hazrat isa(as) and imam mahdi.
If he is using ahadees as the source of information then dude he is clearly 'lying'. Okay lying.

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

Peace chacha_Ghalib

I’m sorry you feel this way about me … but I like the passion in your post … and it is food for thought for me … My intention is not to offend. Although I would not say I am obsessed with the Ahmadis - I am guilty of creating provocative posts … that is true … I don’t know whether I should be offended at the notion that I write long posts … you know the crown for that has to go to brother Mughal1, not me … :hehe:

Anyway … I don’t think I make “square-circle arguments” - some time ago I tried to prove that by creating a thread on detailed Aristotelian Logic … and was going to lead on to how contradictions can be identified and when sophistical reasoning is being applied - I was trying to prove or at least demonstrate that I … you know … know something about making cogent arguments … but here if what you say is true … then all my study of logic and zeal for being consistent is a waste of time … I haven’t learnt anything …

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

We are so obsessed with you that i think your involvement in this thread is done and dusted

Re: What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

If you think you are getting anything but from Allah Subhanahu then that is Shirk

As for Muslims we believe it is permissible to pray directly to Allah The One or to Allah Subhanahu through help of an intermediary. Making them our partners in our Dua to Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala The One

[quote]

And Nauzubillah the way the poster obaid :

I just don't want to believe somebody is so vociferously negating Quranic ayats. Just look at your words. Guys this alone shows how much someone believes in Allah's word. That was sajda of praise and respect to Allah the Magnificent for having created such wonderful creation. And when Allah is ordering the angels then what other question is left behind? Doesn't Allah know more about shirk and what's haram than humans do.

[/quote]

That Sajda was to Adam Salam Alaih