What do Ahmedi's call mainstream muslims?

[Ibn_Sadique]

Re: What do Ahmedi’s call mainstream muslims?

@Mr.Popat

ibn sadique and bao bihari, its easy to gang up and just keep posting but not so easy to admit your mistake right? Ibn Sadique has copy/pasted references wrong. Did you confirm the references I quoted off from Ibn Sadique? they are NOT on the pages he mentioned. And, as I said how Muhammad PBUH that for one to be deemed as a liar, its sufficient that he propagates heresay without confirming.
Now, let me tell you what I said earlier (briefly) which page 59 and 60 of the book quoted says it too.

Dear** Mr. Popat **Please don’t be unreasonable and paranoid, trust me no one ganging up on you.

Indeed it not easy to see ones mistakes if one is dogmatically stubborn.

All the references by me and brother bao bihari are genuine and for real. It’s just that the truth is too bitter for you to swallow.

@Mr.Popat

Ibn Sadique has copy/pasted references wrong. Did you confirm the references I quoted off from Ibn Sadique? they are NOT on the pages he mentioned. And, as I said how Muhammad PBUH that for one to be deemed as a liar, its sufficient that he propagates heresay without confirming.

Please re-read my post numbered 256 posted on 16th May 2014 – partially quoted below:

@Ibn_Sadique

Earlier you had made a claim that I have been posting references which don’t exist on the pages mentioned.

That may be true as Ahmadis/Qadianis are known to alter the page numbers in new editions. This is very common phenomenon among them

Mr. Popat I am sure you are speaking the truth when you say the references are not the pages mentioned, do want to know why?

Ahmadis/Qadianis are printing new versions of their books every few years thus are changing the layouts of their books so the references quoted from the older versions look out of place.

In some cases they are even fraudulently erasing the evidence themselves – to the extent of erasing Mr. Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s relevations!!!

There is a new game in town called Old Tadhkirah vs. the new version

In the old version of Tadhkirah (2004 edition) there was an ilham on page 346:

“God almighty has conveyed it to me that every person to whom my call is conveyed and who does not accept me is not a Muslim and is accountable to God for his default (Letter addressed to Dr. Abdul Hakeem)(April 1906).

Original Tadhkirah (Urdu Version) – The Ilham is mentioned between the dates 31-Mar-1906 and 3-Apr-1906

English Tadhkirah, Year 2006 - The Ilham is mentioned between the dates 31-Mar-1906 and 3-Apr-1906

English Tadhkirah, Year 2009 - The Ilham between the dates 31-Mar-1906 and 3-Apr-1906 has been DELETED!

Scanned copies given in the link below: Scroll down to post 4 - Note every time it is a different page! Now **Mr. Popat **you know what you are against!

The Cult • View topic - Old Tadhkirah vs. the new version

The fraudsters have no Fear of Allah Almighty – in the first incidence they call the material a ilham from Allah Almighty and ditch it into dustbin as if it is worthless rubbish!

Mr. Popat please look for the older versions and you will find the references are correct. Please do confirm with us if you get the right references.

The fault lies in Ahmadiyyah jamaat!!! You can clearly see their mindset. Fraudsters and liars.

I am providing you with following link of book written by** Sahibzada Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad**, I think he is the first son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.

Please scroll down to end of page 316 – not long to scroll down as the link starts from page 303

http://www.alislam.org/urdu/au/AU1-9.pdf

It clearly states that Allah Almighty has informed Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani in Revelation that those who reject him are not Muslims and are accountable to Allah Almighty!!!

This is from Allah Almighty to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani!!!

Who is going to disregard this! Only those who know that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is a false prophet and a fraud!