WASHINGTON (CNN) – President Bush said Monday he would try diplomacy “one more time” in the hope that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein will disarm. His comments came hours after U.S. diplomats delivered a draft resolution on Iraq to the United Nations.
Fleischer said that based on the resolution, the United States “would have all the authority that it needs along with its allies.”
The proposal reportedly offers a compromise in the dispute over what kind of resolution should be approved.
To be quite honest, I am getting sick and tired (not that it matters to anyone) of this nonsense and garbage coming out of that war monger son of a bitch Bush the prick. Have you ever seen anyone so indecisive in your life? Fine, if you want to go to War, then go for gods sake, and if not, then give it a freaking rest. I just cannot support my president even if one innocent Iraqi has to die for his jackass whims.
I wish and pray that some indigenous movement of some brave Iraqi whack that sob of their’s like some brave Saudi whacked King Faisal. Ameen.
Well NY if the U.S. truly was what everyone here claims them to be the the U.S. would be at war with Iraq, but the U.S. does listen to all voices throughout the world on such issues.
And trust me UTD, that makes me very happy that it does. I think Bush could have made his case a lot stronger had he not fired those empties in the beginning of this whole ordeal. I hate Saddam with a passion, but when I see that we are going to treat N. Koreans differently from Iraqis, it makes me very unsure of the motives of the war machinery of the US.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Well NY if the U.S. truly was what everyone here claims them to be the the U.S. would be at war with Iraq, but the U.S. does listen to all voices throughout the world on such issues.
[/QUOTE]
Heck, She does! She has no choice right now then just wait til everyone does agree on it. Alone the GI's will never enter IRAQ. You wanna know the reason? Coz they are a bunch of loser and cowards.
Re: "We've tried diplomacy. We're trying it one more time" -Bush on Iraq
[QUOTE] Originally posted by underthedome: *
**Fleischer said that based on the resolution, the United States "would have all the authority that it needs along with its allies."*
[/QUOTE]
errrm, sorry, but jeez who do they think they're deluding.
I do not consider myself a flaming war freak, but the US military could do the job in Iraq. They are not cowards or losers, they are a professional military, today. The reason we are not going that route is decidedly not the mindset of our soldiers. The justification does exist for action. Saddam's history tends to argue for AND against such action nd this is where the questions lay. Iraq and North Korea are NOT the same country and for anyone to suggest that they should be treated as such against the states position of the US government is foolish. If Bush goes through a process of evaluation and change, fine. I allow him that option as my President. If the UN has made 16 resolutions against Saddam, there must have been a reason. If the UN scolds Israel, there must be a reason. The trouble is that neither have been enforced. That doesn't make the resolutions bad judgements or unfair. They seem to make sense, here.
[quote]
The justification does exist for action. Saddam's history tends to argue for AND against such action nd this is where the questions lay.
[/quote]
Almost the entire world community except for the USA, Israel and the UK does not seem to see any justification for war. As for Saddam's history - well that is just your standard Amercan hypocrisy. Was Rumsfeld not aware of Saddam's history i.e. gassing people, when he had his jovial meetings with him in Baghdad in 1983 and then again in 1984? Did the Reagan administraion not know of such history when it tried to cover up Saddam's gassing of the Kurds in 1988?
[quote]
Iraq and North Korea are NOT the same country and for anyone to suggest that they should be treated as such against the states position of the US government is foolish.
[/quote]
No what is foolish is your argument. Who is the larger danger in terms of WMD and deployment of military forces? Iraq or North Korea? Who has already made nuclear weapons, and has half a million soldiers on the border of its neighbour? Tell us who is the bigger danger?
[quote]
If the UN has made 16 resolutions against Saddam, there must have been a reason. If the UN scolds Israel, there must be a reason. The trouble is that neither have been enforced.
[/quote]
And that exposes more American hypocrisy. If you are going to bomb Iraq for supposedly not abiding by 16 UN Resolutions, what have you threatened to do to Israel for the 66 or so UN Resolutions it has not abided by?