Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Where in Quran does it say to cover the vagina and breasts?
If there is no mention of such then order some burqas with holes in them for those who agree with a monkey like you.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

For such people, Iqbal:rehm: said:

Khud ko badaltaY naheeN, QuraN ko badal detaY haiN
HuaY kiss Darja bay taufeeq, Faqeehaan-e-Haram!

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Isn't there any international law against these satanic souls who are mocking at our religion and fueling our religious sentiments?
Isn't this violation of Human Rights by hurting our religious sentiments?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Its all western propaganda against our great ahle sunnah waljamaat scholars of Ikhwan-ul-Muslimeen and Jama-AlAzhar brother.

These are all fabricated stories.

The highest ahle sunnah wal jamaat authority of Egypt is Mufti aala Hazrat Goma (rehmatullah).

He has never said anything against Hijab.

Khalid kee talwar Jamiat!
Modudi afkar Jamiat!

www.jamaat.org

Jazak Allah khair,

Ajmal.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

He is highest Because he accepts shias as Muslims?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Another satanic way of these so called scholars is that they ignore and deny hadeeth and sunnah of the Prophet :saw: This is a new fitnah , I have seen so many modern Muslims who are misguided and donkeys because they ignore a vital part of guidance - The Hadeeth.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

^ yup, I guess the people who tossed a lot of hadeeth and labelled many as za'eef were also misguided and donkeys .. by your definition?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Go read some and then say something. The difference between zaeef and saheeh and the rest of the classifications are as clear as crystal.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

You are assuming that I have not read any :) if that makes you feel better than so be it. I guess I will just have to spell it out.

hadeeth is not word of god, allah did nto say he would safeguard it and the fact that many were tossed out and many are labelled zaeef does not mean that the rest are all sahih or authentic, they were the best work some men did decades after the prophets death, and frankly this means hadeeth is prone to errors, exaggerations, malicious additions and subtractions, etc etc.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

anyways bed time for me, you kids play on.
hey..and dont forget your hijab :)

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Than by your understanding, none of the hadeeth are correct? So how would you determine whether something is right or wrong? Things such as 5 daily prayers are invalid, because Quran does not give the detail?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

And for your info, hadeeth got started getting recoreded at the times of the Prophet :saw: . There is no Islam without the guidance of hadeeth. According to Quran, Muhammad :saw: does not speak out of his own desire but by what Allah reveals to him.

How can it be that the practicality and the example of the Prophet :saw: is not protected? Yes it is by all means protected for our guidance till the day of Judgment.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

laeeqkhan: you have to understand this…

It’s all about convinience and defining your Islam on your own using your ‘oh-so-intellectual-mind’ … if hadeeth gives u cramps in the stomach and attacks your animal desires then by all means a hadeeth can be corrupted and should not be followed… get my drift? :flower1:

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

People just like taking the easy way out, its inconvinient for them to wear it so they find reasons not to wear it. I mean how freaken hard is it to cover up. Dont you do it in winter? Dont you do it when praying?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

^:k: I have a new found respect for you.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Its all western propaganda against our great ahle sunnah waljamaat scholars of Ikhwan-ul-Muslimeen and Jama-AlAzhar brother.

These are all fabricated stories.

The highest ahle sunnah wal jamaat authority of Egypt is Mufti aala Hazrat Goma (rehmatullah).

He has never said anything against Hijab.

Khalid kee talwar Jamiat!
Modudi afkar Jamiat!

www.jamaat.org

Jazak Allah khair,

Ajmal.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Your denial exposed here: http://www.egypttoday.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3351

Now what are you going to do? Cry? Jump off a cliff? Abandon El-Banna? Abandon Ikhwan? Abandon Jama Al Azhar?

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Not at all, you are choosing to read what you want to read. I am suggesting that hadeeth be taken with a grain of salt because you can not be assured of its authenticity. I dont recall that at any point I said all.

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

Yo may want to read up more about when hadeeth was compiled, look up when and what muslim and bokahri etc did.

and no hadeeth is NOT protected, the proof of that is that in our own history, when hadeethw as being compiled many hdeeth were simply tossed out because they were not valid, the compilers were forced to label many hadeeth zaeeef because they did nto have enough proof to warrant them as being authentic but wanted to be careful and nto toss them out altogether. We are depending on human effort, and the best and most wel intentioned effort, but it still is prone to human errors, weaknesses, lack of information, judgement, biases and what nots

Re: Wearing Of Hijab Not Required By Quran: Egyptian Scholar

As I have told you baccha log on these boards before, for me it is a purley academic interest in understanding how many things are taken as part and parcel of religion, while there is limited or disputed basis for it, or in some cases there is no precedence at all.

convince me, educate me, but dont just call me names,a nd run away not make a case. That only proves my hypothesis that we are following many things without understanding them.

Thats what you have to understand. Anwaar these underhanded statements serve no purpose in a discussion. The question is less about my ‘animal desires’ and more about interest and curiosity. How would anyone get any answers if its just a group think and no one can raise a question, issue or confusion or a diff point of view.