We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

This is what you wrote earlier in response to my assertion that hinduism was responsible for budhist to be disappeared even though India was the birthplace for Budhism.


And this is what you posted in other thread:

Did you just get educated with new information? You do seem to have lot more to learn buddy! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Next time don't try to be so utterly contradictory!

Re: We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

^What are you doing here?Simply posting others posts under my nick? Can you prove that above lines are mine?

Re: We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

Religions come much later, Hinduism doesn't even consider humans equal! How can you even begin to claim that all religions are equal?

Re: We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

^Can you prove with substantial evidences that Hinduism does not treat people equally?

Explain what you are saying so I can answer.

How would I change or use your nick??

Both contradictory statements were posted by you!

You already did by posting the events of massacre against Budhists which led to almost extinction of Budhism from India.

There are many more evidences. Wake up and search with open mind.

Do I really need to remind you about your caste system?

Anothe ill-informed comment..

degenration of caste system which resulted into exploitataion of one by another is not sanctioned by hindu scripture..

Caste system in its pristine form was nothign but labour distribution.. In that system nobody owned anythign everything was of state and in that state diffrent people performed different duties.. and that caste system was not even hereditary it was a;; aptitude based and whichever way you look atthat pristine form of caste system is anythign but exploitataive..

Do nto accuse hindusim for degenration fo some systemm

beauty is today hindus realized that our riginal caste system is not what we have today in practicehence we have illegalized caste based allocation-of-duty practie altgoather..

Anothe ill informed garbage.. fact is throughout histaory buddhist and hinduims teaching centre used to eb same ........ when islamic invaders like Bakhitya khilji burnt the Nalanda university at that time it was sheet of education for both hinduims and buddhism..

Buddhism still was flurshing in India

We have had examples where samrat emperor ashoka turns to buddhism and nt even a finger is raised against it..

We have had tradition of buddhist populace and hindu king like raja dahir and vice versa..

Fact is before islam invaded india whole afghanistan was buddhist citadel despite king being hindu........

Buddhissm lost the battle of ideas thanks to shankracharya..

the debate between shankarachary and mandan mishra is legendary.. Mind you debate of ideas not of sword..

Here you are extrapolating on astray incident to paint the picture blac but the fat is totally different altogether.. even today in every hindu hoome Buddha's picture adorns the pooja room along with other deities..

Do you want me to call what you wrote garbage?

Your fake ignorance is beyond limit. Your reply smells of an apologetic rant. That's all.

Read my post, it was addressed to Arleitter who posted the massacre of Budhists by Hindus proudly in Ranjit Singh thread (history) as first post. Interestingly he tried to deny it above.

There are some similarities in Budhism but a lot differences. So don't even try.

Also, ever read Gita?

Human are divided and treated differently by birth in Hinduism. Trades are assigned to them only after and according to their birth!

Even Gandhi had to ask permission to leave India and pursue law from his sub-caste Modh Bania (Bania= Merchant) That's right according to hinduism caste system he was only good for being a merchant.

As per hinduism untouchables (polluted laborers) are not even caste and are called outcastes.

You pasted the following under my nick…

Originally Posted by Diwana http://www.paklinks.com/gs/images/buttons/viewpost.gif

In the times just preceding the Muslim invasion of India, the Hindu orthodoxy was seen launching a religious crusade against the Buddhists. The holy Boddhi tree at Gaya was burnt.35A Hindu temple was erected on the ruin of a Buddhist monastery. A large scale massacre of Buddhists was ordered. Such a policy resulted in the alienation of the Buddhists from the Hindus and eventually led to their virtual disappearance from India.36

I am asking you where I did post it… The above post is not mine.



Kindly refer your post # 141

lol.

You are again accusing me to change your own post.

Do you ever read what you post yourself?

This was your post and your thread dude!

What do you smoke? Seriously! Something very strong I imagine.

Just remember, I do not make false claims or accusations.

Did you not post the first post in this thread?

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/indo-pak-history/327106-sikh-warrior-ranjit-singh.html

Dude,now I m forced to think that your are in your wrong senses!!!

    You have quoted a line form my a link I have posted and you have generalised it for my post.Nice attempt.That thread was about a personality and I was sharing the my views and authors views on him.It was not about Hindu-Muslim-Budhist conflict.

Re: We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

There was no pristine system. You wouldn't consider Brahmans living like kings and Shudras like rats exploitation but I do. I don't have to put forth any evidence, your very act of defending the system indicates that it has religious roots. You should condemn it without hesitation!

Glad to here you are carrying out some changes in your religions to make it compatible with the modern world.

Forget about what it was for. You agreed with the source and posted. Not a line, almost a paragraph!

Why would you selectively agree with the 'author' or 'source' now after you finally have at least agreed you posted that post?

Obviously your blame on me 'pasting' your nick under those statements was false!

If you post something, you are agreeing with it. Plain and simple.

Thanks by the way for giving another source of information which you tried to deny earlier in this thread but is true that **hindoos did massacre Budhists to almost extermination!

**Read your own post again in history section if any question.

This is what i call garbage.. your philopshy seems to be I have not read any hindu scripture but I will stick to what i belive it preaches..

Anyone who have had even cursory glance over hindu scripture woudl know following things..
(1) Caste syetem was labour-distribution
(2) It was total meritocracy

And ithis system worked for thusands of years.. In later years conceited poeple turned ti into exploitation machinery and that is nto fault of scripture..

Hindus at least take stock of situation and say yes this system has been degnerated into sthg it was not supposed to be hcne course correction is needed..

Brother if I start judging islam with what is practiced in its name you will have no where to hide and you will be the first one with alibis like do nto judge islam with what their followers practice..

I rest my case..

Now about buddhism/Islam: fact is Buddhism flurished as logn as Ialms did ntop come with sword in hand in india..
Fact is we have had difference amongst hindus themselves but it never meant sword fight it was always idelogical fight and I have shown you how universities which were burnt by islamic marauders used to have sheet of learnign for bothi buddhims and hinduism.. How a king like Shoka converts to buddhism an nobody questions his legitimacy.. ti would eb tantamount to Saudi king converting to somethign other than islam or Obama converting to sthg other than chrsitianty..

Instead of appreciating this level of tolerance of hindus masses in general you are deliberating on one exception ..
fact is Hindus and hindusim have always accepted an oppresed..

Even Abdullah Sha Ghazi of Karachi whose mazaar all karchites viist was under the safe haven of hindu rulers.. needless to say they were on run from ummayad khalifs who werebayign for blood for anyone directly related to prohet through fatima and Ali..

Zorashtrains get oppressed by once again islami invaders and again they fidn safe haven in India..

chrstians get persecuted by jews and find safe haven in India...

Everyone have been embraced and some philopshy could not suvive the idlogical fight based on debate then it's that philosphy;s fault..

Another correction brahmins in the opriginal caste system eniovsaged were supposed to live their life through begging..... Now some brahmins later on exploited their position to earn wealth can;t be put at the doors of scripture which specifically forbids it..

Yes that old tale: judge a book by what it preaches nto by what its reader practice.. i am sure Islamists wouldappreciate this given how often they fall on to thsi argyument everytime people try to associate the work of jihadis with islam..

Or is it thsi theory can only eb thrown in defence of islam and others must eb judged differently

Re: We are all hindus now: NewsWeek

Talking of discrimination.. search for the following words

(1)Mawali, Janjaweed militia
(2) Kaka Siyah( is in curency in persia
(3) jazyah ( in certain cases eevn non-arab muslims had to pay jazayah)
(4) basrah ( city of slaves and slave mtinty in protest of jazayah and other discrimination)
(5) Wale-e-faqih of iran where only certain family can be supreme leader
(6) pakistan's tribal hierachy culture which throws instnce like that lady whose punishment was gang-rape

All this happens under umbrella of Islam in this day and age.. Now if someoen says Islam shoudl be judged by these you peope will object .Apply the same rule while talking about degenaration of caste system in hinduims..

This is the second time you wrote the word garbage which I remined you the first time.

Discuss like a human being instead of barking.

The discussion is about hinduism only. All other matters can be and have been discussed elsewhere. Its a very common negative tactics of Indians/Hindus to start talking opposite when they have no real answer to defend.

  I could have edited that link and posted here but I did not want to do it because I had no permission from the author/site.Simple......

Posting something from a link does not mean that the poster is in full agreement with the content.Indeed that link was posted for another personality.So how does it matter?

So obviously my statement was not false but you tries to generalise the content in a different way