Ok i don’t want this to be a bashing thread but honest views needed.
Did Sachin deserve to win man of the match?
Alot of people are saying that Riaz deserved it as he perfomed the best from both teams. And its not necessary that the motm has to be from the winning team so then why?.
This question goes out to those who have good knowledge of cricket and can help us understand why and how they came up with this decision.
Zareen, through your posts and blogs, we all know by this time how pissed you are with indians winning the semi final, but I think its about time you should accept the defeat and let it go ..
Indians won cause they played a better game and Sachin got the Mom because his high score lead the indians to that wining.
Yeah he deserved it coz he's the only player I like in Indian team. lol
Yeh kya baat huwi.
Zareen, through your posts and blogs, we all know by this time how pissed you are with indians winning the semi final, but I think its about time you should accept the defeat and let it go ..
Indians won cause they played a better game and Sachin got the Mom because his high score lead the indians to that wining.
I didnt need your analysis on me just a simple answer to my question. thanks.