watchers defense

Ahmed G wrote:

And this is what a brother said to you: “just a note.. when discussing the prophet, plz show some respect. calling him DEAD doesn’t sound good. Instead, you can say that he died, or he is no longer living.calling the prophet DEAD, just sounds crude..”,

Well I am the ‘brother’ and watcher replied to my above post and he realized that it sounded insensative.

Ahmed G needs to get a life. He has too much time on his hand. Most of the quotes are taken from heated arguments in which all parties sorta 'lost it ’ in my opnion. Singling him out, i’m sure is selfserving for the ‘other side’

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

Nomaan: poor Ahmed G did so much hard search to find some faults of Watcher. You should at least give him some credit for it.
Although Watcher was singled out due to personal animosity, in my opinion other sides were no less offensive rather more obnoxious most of the time.
In my opinion Watcher’s arguments are more elaborated, referenced and logical(most of the time) but he is also short tempered and gets carried away in defense of his arguments. Hw will stand tall in the debates if he keeps his cool.
Rather than repeatedly calling prophet Muhammad as being “Dead”, he could just call him “Passed away”, still get his point across and not hurt anybody’s feeling.

By the way if it was not on internet and in Pakistan, He would have been arrested for Blasphemy and sent to Jail by now.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/frown.gif


Belief is not what mind possesses, it is what possesses the mind!