***Houston proposal is a difficult task
Zaheer Abbas
The double-wicket tournament recently held in the American state of Houston is yet another indication of cricket going places. It all started, if I remember it right, with six-a-side competition in Hong Kong, and then came the Sharjah spot which really took off-shore cricket to new heights.
In the process, neutral venues came to be accepted as a routine thing, and, in the course of time, the International Cricket Council (ICC) also accorded official status to such venues. Almost within no time venues like Canada, Singapore and Kenya cropped up on the international horizon. The most recent addition to the list is Morocco where Pakistan is due to take part in a triangular competition in the coming weeks.
Though the Houston event is not part of the annual ICC itinerary, I read it with much interest that the organizers are planning to go big time, following in the footsteps of the Sharjah-based CBFS. I found it interesting because the proposition has come in the wake of the controversy that has hit neutral venues in recent times. I tend to take Morocco as an exception because it is being managed, at least partially, by those running the show in Sharjah. But developing Houston on similar lines sounds like a risky business proposition, to say the least.
What might have interested the organisers in Houston, I guess, is the similarity between Sharjah and Texas, the state of which Houston is a part. The emirate of Sharjah and the state of Texas both have a large expatriate population from Pakistan and India. In the case of the latter, there may well be a lot of West Indians as well, and a reasonable population of people belonging by birth to countries where cricket happens to be a popular sport. So the love of the game is there. Agreed. But there the similarity ends.
That the required infrastructure could be made available is also not in doubt. Naturally, the organizers would not have gone public about their plans without having taken care of the costs involved, and how to cover such costs. What is also not in doubt is that the organizers would always find players - and, subsequently, national teams - who would love to play in the new environs. All this is perfectly manageable. But then comes the dicey part of the deal over which the organizers would have little say, if at all.
The way things have changed on the global platform in the last about twelve months, I guess the biggest hurdle would be visa and travelling arrangements. This is not for me to say whether it is appropriate or otherwise, but things on the ground suggest in ample measures that the United States of America is not particularly keen on having visitors from abroad, not from the subcontinent at least.
The double-wicket tournament in Houston itself was affected by such hurdles when not all the invitees could make it to the event as visa formalities could not be completed ahead of schedule.
Going by media reports, Pakistan’s Wasim Akram is set to take up the challenge once he decides to hang his boots. But, more than the game itself, it would be global politics and its various currents, under-currents and cross-currents that would determine the fate of the Houston proposal, or so I think.***