Where as Pakistan was obtained for Muslims to lead their life according to Islamic values.
not really. this is what the islamists have hijacked Jinnah's idea into though.
the rest of your post shows your ethnicity very clearly.
Re: Was the forced migration of population in 1947 good for Pakistan??
^^ and Jinnah wanted to have that country for communist?? 
Please just for 5 minutes search the history, why Jinnah wanted a separate land. I bet you will not because you just know how to confuse other by falsifying the information and this show your ethnicity very clearly. 
Re: Was the forced migration of population in 1947 good for Pakistan??
Jinnah pretty much wanted a secular state, all the more so once partition was done with. why don't you spend more than 5 minutes and "search the history", pal.
Re: Was the forced migration of population in 1947 good for Pakistan??
You both need history classes 
Re: Was the forced migration of population in 1947 good for Pakistan??
Quaid-E-Azam did not want a theocratic state but a separate state for muslims because of the discrimination they had to face. Christians and Hindus were promised freedom of religion. Quaid-E-Azam gave us a country but did not live long enough to make us into a nation.
Re: Was the forced migration of population in 1947 good for Pakistan??
^^ I think only if queer seems to understand this =] although there are many who will still nagging their heads.
Do you think the forced migration or exchange of population particularly in punjab in 1947 was good for pakistan in the long run?
I think it was good for pakistan because if there was no forced migration of population in punjab and sindh then hindus/sikhs would be around 15-20% of pakistan's population today. Dealing with such a large population of fifth columnists would have been a constant headache for pakistan because the loyalty of hindu/sikh to pakistan is suspect and questionable
Take the example of bangladesh. In 1970, hindus comprised 20% of the bengali population and were probably over-represented in the Mukti bahini. The bengali hindus openly sided with india in 1971 to create bangladesh cause they had no loyalty to muslim Pakistan. We could have resolved our differences with bengali muslims in 1971 by reaching some compromise but the bengali hindus who joined Mukti bahini were the real problem
While many thousands of muslims were killed in 1947, atleast we were able to get rid of the hindu/sikh population from punjab and sindh and Pakistan today is over 95% muslim. Otherwise if hindus and sikhs were a significant part of pakistan's population like around 15%-20%, they would be a fifth column or indian agents living in Pakistan and a serious threat to Pakistan.
Define 'forced migration' please.
Atleast those forcefully migrated people live in peace,either in India or in some parts of the world.Thy do not have to face the harsh realities of Pakistan ,that's Religious persecution,crimes,Terrorism etc.
What made you stop saying anything bad about muslims living in India?
Could it be that you belong to india and are a die hard Hindu as you say? .....
How about non-hindus being burned alive/killed and to live under fear of being persecuted for not being Hindus?
Wanna try some evidences or admit you made a hateful remark on Pakistan?