Was hz fatima(ra) correct when she demanded fadak as HER INTERITANCE?

[BOY-NICE]

Re: Was hz fatima(ra) correct when she demanded fadak as HER INTERITANCE?

@wellwisher4u

AND ONE THING IS TO UNDERSTAND THAT ACC TO SHIAS, SCHOLARS(ULAMA) DO NOT INHERIT FROM PROPHETS AS WE FOUND FROM THEIR AUTHENTIC AHADEES,.

What ?? How on earth did you reach to this conlclusion based on the above cited traditions? What does these traditions have to do with the inheritance of prophets by their biological/actual heirs? Wherever the Shia text mentions the inheritance of prophets, it does from two perspectives:

1. the spritual inheritors of prophets, are their successors and the learned scholars since they inherit the knowledge of prophets,

2. material posessions that are inherited by the biological progeny/heirs of Prophets.

The traditions relied on are talking about the first aspect only and thus it provided an an opening for the Nawasib to to commit dishonesty and present them as an orthodox belief of the Shia. Pertaining to the traditions cited by you:

-Ulema are not the actual son of Porphets

• Prophets are not their actual fathers
• Knowledge is not an actual possession that can be distributed.

As for the second category, i.e. Hadiths talking about the inheritance of actual/biological heirs pf prophets, we read in various Shia Hadith books:

Zurara narrated that Abi Jaffar (as) said: ‘Ali inherited the knowledge of Allah’s messenger and Fatima inherited his property.’

1. Al-Kafi, Volume 7 page 86
2. Basair al-Darajat, page 314
3. Tahdib al-Ahkam, Volume 9 page 277
4. Min la Yahdrahu al-Faqih, Volume 4 page 261
5. Manaqib al Abi Talib, Volume 2 page 26
6. Allamah Majlisi declared it Hasan in Mirat al-Uqool, Volume 23 page 32

AND WE KNOW THAT IN GENERAL THERE ARE 3 TYPES OF PEOPLE ULAMA(WHO HAS COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE) AND SEEKERS OF ILM AND JAHILS.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT IN WHICH CATEGORY THE SHIAS CONSIDER AHLEBAYT TO BE?

AND IF THEY SAY HZ FATIMA(RA) COMES IN THE CATEGORY OF ULAMA(WHO HAS COMPLETE KNOWLEGDE) THEN THE HADEES APPLIES TO HER THAT PROPHET(SAW) DIDNT LEAVE INHERITANCE FOR HER EXCEPT KNOWLEDGE. AND BELIEVE ME THEY WILL NOT DARE TO CHOOSE THE REMAINING 2 CATEGORIES.[/INDENT][/INDENT]

In the light of what I mentioned above, what does this have to do with the case of Fatima Zahra (sa) who was asking her share “as a biological heir of prophet” ???

Following the absurd interpreation just made by you of the above cited Shia traditons, do we interpret that since Ulema are (biologcial ?) )the heirs of the prophets, hence Ulama are prohibited from inheriting material posessions from their own respective biological fathers??? lol

Moreover there are plethora of evidence of Holy Quran and in Sunni text that proves that prophet’s biological heris do inherit the material posessions of their father-prophets, so your interpretation fall flat on from all aspects!!!