ok lets assume that afghans are better off now than they were with taleban, now what? something the forces could not do in more than 8 years with all their resources and might, who you think is going to do that? and keep the afghans better, does it mean the war should continue? when we say they are better now, are not we accepting that the means used to * make them better * are appropriate? and not to forget, the means here are brutal military action killing thousands.
the whole point of thread was “is the war on terror good?” or did it do any good? and now because you are giving us first hand information that afghans are now much better after this war, so are you advocating for the war or something?