You see in your example you are forced to show a different vocation, since men have a choice in their career. An engineer cannot teach accountancy skills. Thus necessitating the whole schooling business. But the role of women according to you is defined yes? women only need to do housework, surely whatever expertise the daughter is expected to have the mother will have too. It isnt as if we want ethical and moral techniques for upbringing of kiddies to change from mother to daughter.
At best all we really need to do, to have amazingly successful schooling as per your standards, is to train one set of women once, and then rely on them to pass on the good housekeeping training generation to generation. No real need for schools then?
no no, I sense we are at a breakthrough here. And yes I do understand your view, but I have a feeling that schools in your system are more of a PR device than anything functional. It gives a bad impression to say we dont school girls. So you resort to this business of a completely unnecessary social structure (ideally, if your ulema e haq had their way in Afghanistan). You are amongst friends here, there is no need for this unnecessary schooling.