The voice of the women is not a “ ^Awrah” or unlawful to occur in front of men, as some people claim. If the women was reciting Qur’an out loud in front of men, or was giving an Islamic lecture or the like, there is no harm in such an act.
Al-Bukhariy related from ^a’isha (Prophet’s Wife - may Allah be pleased with her) that she was at home once, and she had with her 2 females who were chanting. Their chants were pretty loud that the person in the other room could hear. The Prophet (May peace be upon him) came to the house. He went and laid down on the couch facing the other side, so he won’t be looking at them. He didn’t not ask ^a’isha (may Allah be pleased with her) to stop them from chanting! He did not say it is a ^awra, or ‘nakedness’ or anything.
Abou bakr, came later on, and asked ^a’isha to stop them, but the Prophet, may Peace be upon him, told him that it’s ok.
We all know that the Prophets do not ignore it, they say it’s wrong. If the voice of the women is 3awra, the Prophet Muhamad (May peace be upon him) would’ve asked the females to stop chanting.
Simply, we conclude that if the voice of the women was a ^awrah, than the Prophet would have told the women that would talk to him, and ask him or talked to the Sahabah in front of him, not to do that. And certainly the Sahabah spoke to women infront of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.
Those who misunderstood al-Qur’an, came with such opinion. However, their opinion is not accepted based on the teachings of the Prophet. sallallahu alayhi wa sallam
The ^Awrah of the of the free (that excludes the slave) woman is all her body except the face and her hands.
So, the face of the women is not considered a ^awrah, and she is free to uncover her face and hands. She may cover it however, as an optional act in following the doings of the wives of the Prophet (Sallallahu ^Alayhi Wa Sallam).
i heard when america slaped shiz outa kuwait and their king ran abroad to save his ugly arse to get bombed he left 1000+ londiz behind in his MAHEL and a famous joke abt him in kuwait is ...
when ever he went down to a guls colg ceremony his MASHALLAH use to get replaced by INSHALLAH .
Back in the time, if one had a servant and owned it, Islamically she can be as good as his wife. But that is not occuring now a days, because it's the Calif that manages this issue, so that it's not a chaotic situation.
That's correct, the ^Awrah of the owned servant is different from the free believing women. Who denied that?
Among the conditions of the prayer is the covering of al-^awrah. The unlawful nakedness of the man is between the navel and the knees. The ^awrah of the female-slave during the prayer is like the ^awrah of the man. The ^awrah of the free woman is all her body except the face and her hands. The obligatory covering is fulfilled by covering from all sides but not necessarily from underneath.
Woah hold on a friggin moment - you're telling me that in prayer - a female slave can stand topless and its okay?
What a load of crap, man - where are you getting these baseless theories from? Please refrain from spreading garbage and teaching muslims that which is not true.
That's probably some sick rule that some sicko came up with so that he could have slaves walking around topless in his home.