Is there no other way to demonstrate against it, than through violence? Should people condemn those who use violence in such cases, or should those violent people be consoled?
Should people be more outraged when someone burns a copy of the Quran, then when someone murders or burns human beings on basis of someone ALLEGEDLY burning a copy of the Quran? Why not just condemn the act, and let law run its course, if you’ve got laws dealing with such issues?
What does the Pakistani society gain by these acts of violence?
Violent clashes erupted between police and a charged Muslim mob following reports that a “mentally challenged” Christian man had allegedly burnt the Holy Quran in Lahore’s Glushan Ravi area on Sunday evening.
According to initial information, Humayun Faisal, a middle aged Christian man was taken into custody on Sunday night after some locals of the area accused him of setting a copy of the Holy Quran on fire. Humayun was immediately charged under Section 295-B, which relates to Quran desecration, and was taken to the Gulshan Ravi Police Station.
Sources in the family and Humayun’s neighbourhood told Pakistan Today that Humayun was of unstable mind and his health condition was known to everyone in the locality.
As soon as news of the desecration spread in the area, a mob of about 200-300 locals gathered in the area and started protesting against the accused. Some local Christians said that the mob wanted to burn down their homes but timely intervention by the police saved them.
A large police contingent was deployed in the area after the mob resorted to violence and threw stones at the law enforcers. Two companies of Punjab Rangers were then sent to the area to restore peace. The police also resorted to baton-charge after Lahore
DIG Operations Dr Haider Ashraf suffered a head injury in the clashes.
The situation is very tense in the area following the clashes and most of the Christian residents have fled to safer places.