Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

Good days for Indians. Many Indians are becoming CEO’s of Major companies.
Shaukat Aziz was the contender for Citigroup CEO.

Citigroup - Vikram Pandit
Pepsi - Indra Nooyi
Adobe - Shantanu Narayan
Rohm and Haas - Raj L. Gupta
LSI Logic - Abhi Talwalkar
Hartford Financial - Ramani Ayer
Boeing - Dinesh Keskar…

http://www.cnn.com/2007/BUSINESS/12/...oup.pandit.ap/

Vikram Shankar Pandit a Maharashtrian from Nagpur named Citigroup CEOStory Highlights
Pandit, 50, is seen as a careful, decisive investment banker

He worked at Morgan Stanley for two decades until 2005

Citigroup said in a regulatory filing it has not determined Pandit’s compensation
Next Article in World Business »

NEW YORK (AP) – Citigroup named Vikram Pandit, the head of its investment banking business, as chief executive Tuesday, after searching five weeks for someone to restore the bank’s profitability and reputation.

The banking company named Sir Win Bischoff, who has been Citi’s acting CEO, as its chairman. He replaces Robert E. Rubin, who had stepped into the role when former CEO and chairman Charles Prince was ousted last month.

Pandit, 50, ran a hedge fund bought by Citi earlier this year, is seen as a careful, decisive investment banker – qualities Citi needs following the revelation that Citi’s writedowns of soured mortgages could amount to as much as $17.5 billion by the end of the year.

Bischoff, meanwhile, has led Citi’s European businesses, answering many shareholders’ complaints that Pandit does not have the overseas experience to guide the sprawling bank’s operations in Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. Before joining Citi in 2000, Bischoff, 66, was chairman of the British investment bank Schroders.

The appointments came after a two-day meeting of Citi’s board.

Pandit is well known on Wall Street. He worked at Morgan Stanley for two decades until 2005, when he and a few other disgruntled colleagues left the brokerage and founded the hedge fund Old Lane Partners.

Earlier this year, Citigroup bought Old Lane for $800 million and put Pandit in charge of Citi’s alternative investments. A few months later, Pandit took over the bank’s markets and banking unit, too, and then reconfigured the business to mirror the Morgan Stanley structure he was familiar with.

His performance as Citi’s leader will undoubtedly be scrutinized by investors until they see positive results – including his willingness to challenge the Citi strategy of the past several years. One question on Wall Street is whether Pandit will be beholden to the Citi board, which has remained steadfastly loyal to the Sanford Weill regime.

Weill, a board member, built Citigroup through a series of mergers and acquisitions over the past few decades, and many have attributed the bank’s failings this year to the Weill culture: Prince was his hand-picked successor.

During a conference call with analysts, Pandit suggested he was open to selling certain units, as long as the sales were beneficial to the company.

“I will undertake an objective and dispassionate review of all the businesses, individually and in aggregate, to make sure we are properly positioned for the future,” Pandit said.

Don’t Miss
Abu Dhabi buys Citigroup stake
Unlike Merrill Lynch, which took just two weeks to find a replacement for Stan O’Neal, its embattled CEO and another casualty of the mortgage crisis, Citi’s search dragged on. Merrill’s nab of John Thain, a Goldman Sachs alum who turned around the once-troubled New York Stock Exchange, eliminated him as a possibility for Citi.

Citi, with all its bad debt – not to mention the hemorrhaging funds known as structured investment vehicles that it manages – appeared to be a beast no one wanted to tame.

According to various media reports, Citi’s overtures to big names in the banking industry such as Deutsche Bank CEO Josef Ackermann and Royal Bank of Scotland CEO Frederick Goodwin were spurned. And Citi board member Rubin, the former Treasury Secretary who led the CEO search committee, decided he did not want to stay chairman.

Rubin said, however, that he anticipates “a long and active role at Citi.” He remains chairman of the bank’s executive committee.

Pandit faces multiple challenges. He must not only attract more cash to offset Citi’s debt and bulk up the bank’s risk management, but he also needs to strengthen Citi’s lackluster consumer-oriented businesses and clean up its reputation.

Citigroup said in a regulatory filing that it has not yet determined Pandit’s compensation. In 2006, Prince received nearly $25 million in pay.

Citi’s stock has fallen about 40 percent this year, shaving off about $120 billion in market capitalization and putting it below that of Bank of America Corp. Its shares fell $1.54, or 4.4 percent, to $33.23 Tuesday when most shares fell after the Federal Reserve announced – at the same moment that Citigroup unveiled Pandit’s promotion – that it was cutting the federal funds rate by one-quarter percentage point to 4.25 percent.

Citi is still the largest U.S. bank by assets, though, so while most major financial companies have seen problems navigating a surge in foreclosures and a freeze-up in credit, Citi’s losses have been seen on Wall Street as particularly egregious.

Citi’s cash levels will get a boost by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, which in late November bought a 4.9 percent stake in Citi for $7.5 billion. But the investment, while helpful in offsetting some of Citi’s bad debt, is not a panacea. Many analysts and shareholders believe Pandit needs to sell more assets to bring in cash and make the huge conglomerate leaner. Citigroup has said non-essential assets selloffs are in the works, but many shareholders are hoping for more ruthless surgery.

The board has been adamant about not breaking up the bank.

Rubin said after Prince’s resignation that the search committee was looking for someone to focus on Citigroup’s “multiplicity of businesses” and with “a strong international focus.”

Pandit, though he spent his childhood in India, has little experience with banking abroad. His strengths are his decades on Wall Street and his analytical mind.

“Under the circumstances, I can’t think of anyone better qualified to untangle Citigroup than Vikram Pandit,” said Barton Biggs, who was Morgan Stanley’s top strategist and worked with Pandit for two decades. Biggs, now the head of the hedge fund firm Traxis Partners, called Pandit intelligent, and not one to make “lightning-quick decisions.”

“That doesn’t mean he’s not decisive – he’s thoughtful and careful,” said Biggs, who is also a Citi shareholder. He added that many colleagues have followed him from Morgan Stanley to Old Lane to Citi.

Even in the years that Morgan Stanley struggled, the investment banking unit did well, in large part because of Pandit, said Punk Ziegel & Co. analyst Richard Bove. “He proved at Morgan Stanley he could build a strong capital markets business.”

But neither Pandit nor Bischoff have significant experience in consumer banking, which brings in half of the company’s profit and which, compared to its peers, has seen lackluster results.

Pandit has also never run a large public company. And some see his lack of flash and pizazz as a drawback – though to others, a cool, quiet demeanor in the top spot could be just what is needed at a company often criticized as arrogant

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

That's good news :)
It's just the beginning of Asian talent surfacing..it'll go much further

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

So there is no "Glass Ceiling" ....

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

congratulations :k:

Keep it up indians :slight_smile:

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

yep the post was offered to shukat aziz but he turned it down.

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

:hmmm:

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

Really? That's nuts (of him). But then he shouldn't have said "with me you get two for one" (the 2nd being Mushy as chairman)

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

By Marlen V. Ronquillo
Indian stars and so-so Pinoys

http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/dec/16/yehey/opinion/20071216opi3.html

Acontentious, fractious democracy flawed in many respects. A democracy that seems to forever spawn and nurture the antithesis of democracies—political dynasties. A democracy cursed by tribal politics.

A democracy without the imperative discipline and order. And civic ethic.

When you scan the globe to look at two democracies similarly situated, you can immediately think of two: the Philippines and India .

The similarities do not end there.

The two countries have citizens forever on a wanderlust, the constant move and migration a distinct feature of both societies. India and the Philippines have been continuously sending their skilled workers and professionals overseas. They have been consistently on the list of countries receiving hefty remittances from their global work forces, spread across diverse parts of the planet, from Middle East construction sites to Silicon Valley.

Recently, riding on the crest of the technology boom, jobs in the BPO sector have been on a reverse migration—heading toward India and the Philippines.

Of course, there is a marked divergence in the achievement, reach and trajectory of their global work forces. While the Philippines has more contribution to the global work force than India (if the reckoning is OFW to total population), Indians have been exporting real movers and shakers, CEOs to Fortune 500 companies. Something that cannot be said of Filipino expats.

The superior talent of India’s manpower exports came to full light this week as Citi*group, the largest financial service group in the United States, named Vikram Pandit, its CEO. The troubled financial behemoth opted to appoint an insider rather than pick an outsider and this worked well for Pandit, who was chief financial officer of Citigroup before his new appointment.

Pandit is not a second-generation Indian-American. He came from Nagpur, India, and first set foot in America to study at Columbia, where he earned three degrees.

Pandit is not the first Indian native to head a Fortune 500 company.

In Sept. 2006, PepsiCo named Indra Nooyi as its CEO. Nooyi took the same route as Pandit—graduate studies in the United States, then the spectacular rise in corporate America.

At Silicon Valley, Indian natives staff middle-level and management positions . Some of the best technology innovators are from India and Indians get a sizable slice of the 20,000 work visas the US grants every year to professionals from other countries. Indians are the most dominant Asians at the best jobs in Wall Street and Silicon Valley. The technology giants cannot seem to get enough of them.

Bill Gates is setting up satellite offices in Canada just to get enough Indian IT experts into Microsoft, whose mass recruitment is not allowed by the US cap on work visas.

Filipinos, meanwhile, are content with middle-management jobs at Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Filipino whiz kids have yet to enter the top tier jobs at the two prime bastions of finance and entrepreneurship. Has there been a Filipino head of a Fortune 500 company? I doubt it.

Indians in US B-schools, with GMAT scores of 600 and above, routinely get into Wharton, Haas, Kellog , Tuck and Harvard. Filipinos mostly get into the second-tier schools because of their lower GMAT scores.

What’s the difference?

Education has been behind India’s prodigious turnout of Masters of the Universe. Elite business, engineering and technology schools have gotten massive state support and funding. Its fractious and unwieldy democracy has never been a hindrance to spending lavishly on educational investments.

Where are we in this vital concern?

Education is our priority. The Constitution says so. But the 2008 national budget spells out the hard truth: the primacy of education is merely lip service, according to Sen. Loren Legarda in her turno en contra speech on Monday. Total allocation for debt payment is more than P600 billion (interest payment and principal). Education gets something like P140 billion. But this is a deceptive figure.

Of the P140 billion or so appropriated for education, more than 80 per cent of it will go to salaries and wages and maintenance and operating expenses. Only crumbs will go to real spending and fresh outlay.

The niggardly spending, says Legarda, is done in the context of an education sector plunging into one sure direction—into mediocrity.

Business Leaders, India’s New Hot Export

Business Leaders, India’s New Hot Export

Citigroup Inc. provided this file photo Vikram Pandit. The ascension of Indian-born leaders like Pandit, the new CEO of Citigroup Inc., tracks the economic rise of their home country, once seen by U.S. business as a large market or a source of low-cost technology workers, now viewed as a business power that rivals the U.S. in some industries. (AP Photo/Citigroup)

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5icUKcJL80ciVnCHbUWfCuuPUMGOgD8TGP1M00

By ELLEN SIMON – 1 day ago

NEW YORK (AP) — The ascension of Indian-born leaders like Vikram Pandit, the new CEO of Citigroup Inc., tracks the economic rise of their home country, once seen by U.S. business as a large market and a source of low-cost technology workers, now viewed as a business power that rivals the U.S. in some industries.

The change is visible on the board of the U.S.-India Business Council, once comprised only of executives from U.S. companies doing business in India. Now, the board includes executives from global companies with business in India, Indian-Americans heading global businesses and Indian companies with interest in the U.S.

Board members include Arun Kumar, head partner at KPMG International, Indra Nooyi, CEO of PepsiCo Inc. and Lakshmi Narayanan, vice chairman of Cognizant Technology Solutions, an outsourcing company that bills itself as “the best of both worlds.”

ArcelorMittal has grown into the world’s largest steelmaker, offering $1.65 billion Friday for the remaining shares of Chinese steelmaker China Oriental Group Co. it doesn’t already own. While the company is based in the Netherlands, its Indian CEO and founder, Lakshmi Mittal, controls nearly half its shares.

India’s outsourcing companies have grown to take on more valuable contracts, pitting them against U.S.-based giants such as IBM Corp. and Accenture Ltd.

For instance, India’s Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. in October announced a $1.2 billion contract from American market research firm Nielsen, the largest outsourcing order ever won by an Indian company and one that includes services from information technology infrastructure management to payroll processing.

And India’s Tata Group has expressed its interest in buying troubled Ford Motor Co.'s Jaguar and Land Rover units.

“It’s harder to see the borders now,” said Gregory Kalbaugh, director and counsel of the U.S.-India Business Council.

As the Indian economy has been on a tear, clocking 6 to 8 percent annual growth, Indian and U.S. political leaders have viewed business ties as a way to bring the countries closer. Pres. George Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh handpicked members of the US-India CEO Forum, launched in 2005, to plan increased partnership and cooperation.

Meanwhile, U.S. businesses, increasingly dependent on foreign trade, have intensified their interest in promoting an international group of executives. Nearly half of sales for 238 of the largest U.S. companies was from outside the U.S. for fiscal year 2006, up from one-third of sales in fiscal 2001, according to Standard & Poor’s.

At the same time, Indians who came to the U.S. to study 30 years ago have worked their way up the ranks of American companies. The latest round of promotions includes Shantanu Narayen, who joined Adobe Systems Inc. in 1998 and was appointed CEO this month.

Others have been in their jobs far longer, such as Ramani Ayer, chairman and CEO of Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., who has led the company since 1997.

Some of the rising stars:

_K.S. (Sonny) Kalsi, managing director and global head of Morgan Stanley’s real estate investing business, which has $88.3 billion in assets under management

_Meena Mutyala, vice president of engineering and product management for Westinghouse Electric Corp.'s nuclear fuel business worldwide.

_ Sheila Hooda, senior managing director, strategy at $437 billion investment company TIAA-CREF, who was previously a managing director in the investment banking division at Credit Suisse.

The rise of Indian-born executives such as Pandit, who on Monday was named CEO of Citigroup, the world’s largest bank, follows by more than a decade the advances of Indian business consultants.

A handful of Indian-born academics, especially Ram Charan and C.K. Prahalad, long-ago established themselves at the upper echelons of business consulting; consultant and author Charan was reportedly the first outsider Jeffrey Immelt turned to for advice when he became CEO of General Electric Co.

Rajat Gupta, who joined McKinsey & Co. in 1973, was elected managing director of the management consulting firm in 1994, then re-elected to two more three-year terms in 1997 and 2000. Gupta is leaving McKinsey at the end of this year to concentrate on his board positions.

One of Gupta’s latest gigs: Special adviser on management reform to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

Well done India! Good luck to Vikram Pandit in turning Citi around to profitability. It will not be easy and there are a huge number of people in the old finance business that are closet bigots. They already have the covert fangs out!

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

I don’t think that’s true… he was never even in consideration. Here’s the low-down from NY Times as well as The News

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

Congratulations to Mr. Pandit and to India for producing such talent :)

I only wish that Pakistan and Pakistanis would be in such a spotlight. Perhaps one day, our time will come.

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

Can you kindly provide any proof of this revelation? Any news clipping, anything please? All I heardthat he senthis "feeler" and they didn't feel any love.

Re: Vikram Pandit named Citigroup CEO

you forgot Arun Sareen of Vodafone