Re: Viewpoints from Sindh
PaKpatriot1: Brother, I read what you wrote ... but only thing I made from your post is that:
You have not read Article 209 ... or if read, you did not tried to understand it. If you would have read and understood it, you would have realised that SC judges were either incompetent and ignorant of English and wording of constitution (article 209) .... or were corrupt and thus intentionally did not understood what article 209 says.
You have not read the reference agaisnt Iftikhar ... as if you had, you would not have considered Iftikhar an honest person ... because most mentioned in the reference is so obvious (still high level of corruption, nepotism, misuse of office, misconduct and misbehaviour case) that government could not have sent reference without them to be true because it was simple for any judge to investigate and find them to be true or lies.
You have nothing to say other than that .. If A dance naked than B should be allowed to dance naked too ... in other words ... If many are doing corruption, nepotism, misuse of power, misbehaviour and guilty of misconduct than Iftikhar should not be told not to do that.
From your post it also seems that you are under illusion that SC found Iftikhar not guilt ... as they did not ... but they only stopped investigation by SJC against Iftikhar ... that means they did not found 'Iftikhar not guilty of the allegations in reference' but they stopped reference getting investigated.
Since you have nothing to say ... instead of talking about reference and what Iftikhar did and ... why you support a person as CJ who could be guilty of nepotism, corruption, misuse of post, misconduct and misbehaviour? ... and that why such corrupt person should be left as CJ? ... and that what right SC have to stop SJC when SJC is suppose to be above judges? ... through out your post the escape route you took is that to just keep jumping on Musharraf and what he can do and what he cannot ...
But the worse is that ... You could not see the difference between the post of Chief Justice and other posts in the country.
Anyhow ... I do not think that it matters. You stay happy :) ... In the end Iftikhar got a good kick and I dont care where he has ended ... he is no more an entity worthy of caring and talking about anyhow. :)
Actually, I beleive that after years when there would be no Musharraf and people would look at things objectively ... Iftikhar is going to be remembered as disgraced person ... because all allegations against him is now published and thus would be on record and would stand against him as he did not faced them but did all to avoid them ... and Atizaz would also going to be remembered as person who supproted Iftikhar and his corruption ... and all disgraced sacked judges would stay on record that they did not let SJC function just to save their corrupt boss Iftikhar.