various 'schools' of thought in Islam

[psyah]

Re: various ‘schools’ of thought in Islam

@vroom

I’ll avoid any reply to these points to avoid flooding the thread with each others thoughts. We know where are stood and our responsibilities. Continued reminders are good

Well they would, to be seen of men, distance themselves it still appears in some new literature. Its still there for the majority afaik, it is known as a deobandi belief so deobandis (Abdul deobandis) defend it. However please note the attempt. I am presenting this as a an example of the attempt of the Munafiqeen, in that they tried to introduce such a thing.

We call Kazzab the LIAR, so imkan e kadhib is a serious matter. The people of Islam once again stood up against them, as was needed. It is through the hard work of the Ahlus Sunnah [Barelvi] that we put up some kind of opposition to this rampage. I commend this courage over, much over newer Muslims such as Hamza and Hakim. This is in reply to your polemics suggestion. Defending Aqeedah is for the more ‘responsible’ Scholars, Real Scholars, so you can enjoy your dhikr, spirituality.

The Sunni position is that it is impossible for Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala since lying is a defect and Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala is free from defects

My understanding of the issue is:

1 impossible for Allah - Sunni Belief
2 intrinsically possible but does not - deviant belief
3 …can lie - kufr, further statements required to determine if Kaffir
4 …does lie - Kaffir

deobandis are upon no 2, and this is how they were dealt with and are being dealt with. Overall deobandis are not regarded as Kaffirs for this, although it might actually be the case, The Shariah did not permit the fatwa of Kufr for their belief upon uproar and investigation

Not all Deobandis still accept that position - but this is a very nice post thank you …

JazakAllahukhair