Where-ever we have touched upon matters of fiqh, i recall you do not agree with deobandi/nadwi [for example Imam Abideen wahabi khawarij, Qasr Salah, beliefs] but anyway this is not important to me, something for you to think about.
And you have ditched them [deobandis] on beliefs too
So I have nothing to say about these frivolous [non] points, I will say there is Markers that define us and our religion. I know some of these markers.
if avoiding fanaticism means you are neutral then neutralism on those points is what you are upon. It may be that i take an opinion on neutralism
Thank you, it can be said talib ur rehman has benefited more from us then you