various 'schools' of thought in Islam

[psyah]

Re: various ‘schools’ of thought in Islam

@vroom

Most of what I said is true! So what is not true according to you, or generally what i have said is true?
Also you disagree with deobandi position, so do you agree with Imam Abideen that Ibn Abdul wahab and his group is khawarij. This by extension has implications for deoband, in that they too are part of the khawarij spectrum, are bootlickers or opportunists.

Ihklaq can mean different things to different people. When i see Sunnis [Barelvis] i see them as having good manners. I suppose if you are from the opposition or consider yourself one, then there is cause for concern in you that you will not be given good treatment. and there is nothing wrong with this at least from the sunni barelvi side. and if you have missed the bad manners of deobandism then you are deaf, dumb and blind, truely and utterly

And for a deobandi to talk about Ihklaq after what you guys have built your empire on. That’s hypocritical [Nifaaq/Munafiq]

and there is a contradiction between your last statement and your first. I will not be adopting your approach. Sure its academically fashionable but I’d rather carry my beliefs with me

One of you is saying most things i have said is true meaning truth, and you are saying everything i have said has been refuted. refuted as being true? refuted with faslehood? what kind of refuted and what issues are you talking about? I have mentioned a few issues including the fact that Mufti Hanif Qureshi brought the head of a batil group home with a admittance that your imam and their [salafi] imam was upon kufr. its lol enough to have same imam

In one sentence you are insinuating haq is deobandi and i am wrong, and the next you are agreeing with a statement which is does not even claim to know truth. So its either Haq or you are not sure

Although really it may just be a sign of support, even though your beliefs are different. So a conspiracy towards a common goal

I wish to avoid fanaticism … brother vroom … I follow Deobandi/Nadwi school in matters of fiqh and I follow my Shadhili/Sufi teachers for matters of ihsan, not the Deobandis - I see what the Barelvis say is correct in matters that pertain to the adab and maqam of RasoolAllah (SAW) but I can’t see that is has benefited most of them in matters of ihsan, except when they specifically resort to a tariqah … So just as my tariqah has allowed me to rise above the problems in Deobandism, my fellow mureeds who are from Barelvi backgrounds are elevated above the problems from Barelvism and hence I get along just fine with my brothers in tariqah regardless of what fiqh background they are from …

Do you have a Shaykh in tariqah brother?