various 'schools' of thought in Islam

[vroom]

Re: various ‘schools’ of thought in Islam

@psyah

Peace vroom

Most of what you have said here is true … and for those who wish to see the evidence it is here:

Answer: Darul Ifta Deoband India
Answer: Darul Ifta Deoband India

I personally disagree with the Deobandi position that it is right to consider Abdul Wahab Al-Najdi worthy of praise and I also think it is wrong for them to think of the position of Ahmad Raza Khan (RA) erroneous. When I said I still follow Deoband - I mean it in terms of their practices in the Hanafi madhab and not in their political positions regarding others. There are certain things I dislike about from the Barelvi school and do not find them in the core Islamic values of Sunnis from other countries … Ikhlaq is the quickest and highest sign of true guidance as well as adherence to Shar’iah.

In this sense I do not identify with either group nor differ from either completely … Note how I say things as “I view them, or believe this about them, etc …” rather than saying “They are this or that, or such and such IS the truth”

Most of what I said is true! So what is not true according to you, or generally what i have said is true?
Also you disagree with deobandi position, so do you agree with Imam Abideen that Ibn Abdul wahab and his group is khawarij. This by extension has implications for deoband, in that they too are part of the khawarij spectrum, are bootlickers or opportunists.

Ihklaq can mean different things to different people. When i see Sunnis [Barelvis] i see them as having good manners. I suppose if you are from the opposition or consider yourself one, then there is cause for concern in you that you will not be given good treatment. and there is nothing wrong with this at least from the sunni barelvi side. and if you have missed the bad manners of deobandism then you are deaf, dumb and blind, truely and utterly

And for a deobandi to talk about Ihklaq after what you guys have built your empire on. That’s hypocritical [Nifaaq/Munafiq]

and there is a contradiction between your last statement and your first. I will not be adopting your approach. Sure its academically fashionable but I’d rather carry my beliefs with me

@bao_bihari

@vroom i do not know what bias you have with deoband school of thought. Every thing you have said is refuted and is either based on wrong claims or misinterpreted misquotes. Any way i think your posts will be having a positive impact for deobandis as this will make people read and any one who reads with open mind will know the HAQ inshallah.

i prefer not to take part in these discussions , as these are useless and waste of time. but that does not mean that what ever this guy writes is true. I urge reader to search for the sources(not quotations) to verify these claims.

One good website to find most of deobandi books (to verify what the quotes) is ISLAMIC BOOKS LIBRARY | Authentic Site for Authentic Islamic Knowledge

One of you is saying most things i have said is true meaning truth, and you are saying everything i have said has been refuted. refuted as being true? refuted with faslehood? what kind of refuted and what issues are you talking about? I have mentioned a few issues including the fact that Mufti Hanif Qureshi brought the head of a batil group home with a admittance that your imam and their [salafi] imam was upon kufr. its lol enough to have same imam

@bao_bihari

:k: exactly what i believe as well.

In one sentence you are insinuating haq is deobandi and i am wrong, and the next you are agreeing with a statement which is does not even claim to know truth. So its either Haq or you are not sure

Although really it may just be a sign of support, even though your beliefs are different. So a conspiracy towards a common goal