US terrorists seek truce with militants. No S**t, they’re getting their ass kicked. :k:
"Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said the military was seeking a cease-fire during the talks, but explosions and sporadic gunfire "
Remember just a week ago all that brave talk about how they would crush the “insurgents” and never talk to ‘terrorists’ and ‘criminals’ etc. 
Long live the victorious resistance!
Cease fire and then talks with the terrorist! boy this is getting better every time...... jaab phati tho sarey convention yaad ae gay... sarey ceasefire yaad ae gay...LOL....
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
Cease fire and then talks with the terrorist! boy this is getting better every time...... jaab phati tho sarey convention yaad ae gay... sarey ceasefire yaad ae gay...LOL....
[/QUOTE]
Iraq this morning, after the ceasefire offer...
[thumb=E]Terrorist12327_3229376.JPG[/thumb]
[thumb=E]Terrorist22327_7504121.JPG[/thumb]
[thumb=E]Terrorist32327_8976093.JPG[/thumb]
One more reason why America has the most humane fighting force in the world. It can kill everyone in Fallujah if it wants to ten times over, but instead it chooses to give the terrorists another chance.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
One more reason why America has the most humane fighting force in the world. It can kill everyone in Fallujah if it wants to ten times over, but instead it chooses to give the terrorists another chance.
On the other hand we have proud freedom fighters of iraq threating to burn alive japanese people and mutilating dead bodies of americans. The contrast is so apparent.
[/QUOTE]
The soviets could wipe out the planet dozen times over but instead the reality sinked in and they pulled out from Afghanistan. The Chinese could have walked over HK in a heart beat but instead they let the law of the land pervail. They can sink Taiwan but instead they will give it a chance to follow the example of HK. You been told by several Guppies to keep shut instead of making an ass of yourself.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
The soviets could wipe out the planet dozen times over but instead the reality sinked in and they pulled out from Afghanistan. The Chinese could have walked over HK in a heart beat but instead they let the law of the land pervail. They can sink Taiwan but instead they will give it a chance to follow the example of HK. You been told by several Guppies to keep shut instead of making an ass of yourself.
[/QUOTE]
Your examples are wrong. America is fighting terrorists that like to kill innocent people all over the world. America has nothing to lose from destroying all of iraq, unlike the other eamples you mentioned. This is not a fight over land or oil as you'd like to think.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Your examples are wrong. America is fighting terrorists that like to kill innocent people all over the world. America has nothing to lose from destroying all of iraq, unlike the other eamples you mentioned. This is not a fight over land or oil as you'd like to think. It is a fight to make sure no other islamist terrorists atack america like they did on 9/11. They started the fight and they will pay for it. It's the iraqis fortune that america is not like russia that totally leveled grozny, or china that destroyed tibetan and ughir culture. Instead america will risk the lives of its soldiers to give iraq the oppertunity to have a functioning democracy.
[/QUOTE]
As Guppies labbled you the highest honor of your world you are also funny..... Saddy could also have wiped out Shias of course with US provided tons of chemicals but then he chose not too he was only after terrorist..... America is a lying and has been kicked several times before, true the respctive countries paid a heavy price in millions of innocent lives but they were taught a lesson never to look that way again.... Iraqis will pay the price too but its a price worth paying to defeat terrorism just like China did in its back yard in the 50s, 60s and 70s. The question is when US run what spin will it give...
Some 70 foreign terrorists killed in the last week, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That's the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched...that tells you something. :)
So out goes the talk of not talking to terrorists and criminals, and in comes the talk of ceasefires - just as predicted, like Vietnam....
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Your examples are wrong. America is fighting terrorists that like to kill innocent people all over the world. America has nothing to lose from destroying all of iraq, unlike the other eamples you mentioned. This is not a fight over land or oil as you'd like to think.
[/QUOTE]
You're so wrong!
The USA are fighting guerillas/freedom fighters same as South Africa did when the Apartheid regime was fighting the present ANC government soldiers. Later history books will teach it as such.
Presently the USA forces are an occupying force in another sovereign country where, it seems a large part of the civilian population does not want them there. Unfortunately the USA did not properly plan the aftermath of the war.
The occupation was not about removing a dictator but oil, stability for Israel in the region, and Bush's personal hate for Sadam - period.
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Malik73: *
Some **70* foreign terrorists killed in the last week, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That's the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched...that tells you something. :)
So out goes the talk of not talking to terrorists and criminals, and in comes the talk of ceasefires - just as predicted, like Vietnam....
[/QUOTE]
Three more foreign terrorists killed some hours ago, so 73 foreign terrorists have now been killed in the last week or so, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That's the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched...that tells you something. :)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Three more foreign terrorists killed some hours ago, so 73 foreign terrorists have now been killed in the last week or so, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That's the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched...that tells you something. :)
[/QUOTE]
Excuse me, since I last posted it has been reported that five more foreign terrorists are now listed as killed, bringing the total to 78 in the last week or so, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That's the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched...that tells you something. :)
You got me there for a while … ‘foreign terrorists!!!’…
Thats what they really are…aptly put! :k:
After the mass murder of men, women and children in Falluja and elsewhere, these people should rightly be titled genocidal foreign terrorists. They are now making Saddam look like an amateur.
Anyhow, two more genocidal foreign terrorists have been despatched to hell (inshallah), so some 80 have now been killed in the last week, and dozens more injured all over Iraq. That’s the highest proportion since March 2003, when this illegal war was launched…that really tells you something. 
Al Sado, as predicted has run away.
http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9265904^1702,00.html
US-trained Iraqi policemen have defected to the insurgent forces of the radical Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr 
and some other Iraqi security forces have failed to fulfill their duties in recent days, the top commander of US forces in the Middle East said today.
“These numbers are not large but they are troubling to us, and clearly we’ve got to work on the Iraqi security forces,” General John Abizaid said.
Abizaid also said some troops from the Army’s 1st Armoured Division will stay in Iraq for longer than anticipated. The entire division had been scheduled to leave Iraq by the end of next month but some units have been sent to regain control of the southern city of Kut, Abizaid said.
He refused to cite a specific number of US troops that would be kept in Iraq longer than planned, but said he had requested “two brigades of combat power, if not more”. A brigade normally would number from 3500 to 5000 soldiers.
In Fallujah, where US marines are surrounding the unstable city, no major attacks from insurgents occurred during daylight hours today, said Army General Ricardo Sanchez, the commander of American ground forces in Iraq.
Spokesmen: Agreement reached in Najaf
U.S. troop deaths reach grim milestone
:hehe: Sadr seems to have got quite a following now. Now his policemen will take care of the city, the yanks still dare not enter.
All the while the American’s are fleeing like the genocidal cowards they are..
US troops pull back from Fallujah](Daily Jang: Urdu News - Latest Breaking News update Pakistan - jang.com.pk)
Now the yanks cry ceasefire, ceasefire please!! :rotfl:
You all really want the US to use its full force on fallujah, don't you?
Ceasefire, ceasefire! Negotiations, Negotiations!
[thumb=F]2327_2803310.JPG[/thumb]