US looks away as Uzbek leader tortures Islamists

One of the most sickening details to come out of this article is this one: >>According to a forensic report commissioned by the British embassy, in August two prisoners [in Uzbekistan] were even boiled to death.<<

There are an estimated “6500” political prisoners in this society, some of whom have been “tortured to death”. This sounds like a society closely paralleling that of Saddam Hussein’s - with the difference that President Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan, continues to benefit from US aid (whereas Hussein was abandoned years ago). According to the article, Uzbekistan’s “police and intelligence services” (who use “torture as a routine investigation technique”) received $79m in aid - from the US. The plight of these Uzbeks (or “Islamists”) seems to parallel the plight of many Iraqis who were tortured under Hussein - perhaps, in another twenty years, President Karimov too will become the most demonized dictator on earth and we will have to oust his regime. But that will be an occurrence 20 years too late for those who are currently suffering under this brutal dictatorship.

US looks away as new ally tortures Islamists, Nick Paton Walsh
The Guardian, 26 May 2003

Abdulkhalil was arrested in the fields of Uzbekistan’s Ferghana valley in August last year. The 28-year-old farmer was sentenced to 16 years in prison for “trying to overthrow the constitutional structures”.

Last week his father saw him for the first time since that day on a stretcher in a prison hospital. His head was battered and his tongue was so swollen that he could only say that he had “been kept in water for a long time”.

Abdulkhalil was a victim of Uzbekistan’s security service, the SNB. His detention and torture were part of a crackdown on Hizb-ut-Tahrir (Party of Liberation), an Islamist group.

Independent human rights groups estimate that there are more than 600 politically motivated arrests a year in Uzbekistan, and 6,500 political prisoners, some tortured to death. According to a forensic report commissioned by the British embassy, in August two prisoners were even boiled to death.

The US condemned this repression for many years. But since September 11 rewrote America’s strategic interests in central Asia, the government of President Islam Karimov has become Washington’s new best friend in the region.

The US is funding those it once condemned. Last year Washington gave Uzbekistan $500m (£300m) in aid. The police and intelligence services - which the state department’s website says use “torture as a routine investigation technique” received $79m of this sum.

Mr Karimov was President Bush’s guest in Washington in March last year. They signed a “declaration” which gave Uzbekistan security guarantees and promised to strengthen “the material and technical base of [their] law enforcement agencies”. The cooperation grows. On May 2 Nato said Uzbekistan may be used as a base for the alliance’s peacekeeping operations in Afghanistan. Since the fall of the Taliban, US support for the Karimov government has changed from one guided by short-term necessity into a long-term commitment based on America’s strategic requirements.

Critics argue that the US has overlooked human rights abuses to foster a police state whose borders give the Pentagon vantage points into Afghanistan and the other neighbouring republics which are as rich in natural resources as they are in Islamist movements.

The geographical hub of the US-Uzbek alliance is 250 miles south of the capital, Tashkent. Outside the town of Karshi lies the Khanabad military base, the platform for America’s operations in Afghanistan. The town of Khanabad has been closed for months by the Uzbek government. Locals say the restrictions are compensated for by the highly paid work the base brings. Journalists are not allowed in to see its runway, logistical supply tents and troop lodgings, all set on roads named after New York avenues. One western source said: “[The Americans] expect to be here for over a decade.”

This will suit the Uzbek government, which welcomes America’s change in attitude as its own security forces continue to repress the population. Uzbeks need a permit to move between towns and an exit visa to leave the country. Attendance at a mosque seems to result in arrest. In the city of Namangan, in the Ferghana valley, there are many accounts of the regime’s brutality. A fortnight ago, Ahatkhon was beaten by police and held down while members of the Uzbek security service stuffed “incriminating evidence” into his coat pocket. They called in two “witnesses” to watch them discover two leaflets supporting Hizb-ut-Tahrir. He was forced to inform on four friends, one of whom - an ex-boxer - is still in pain from his beating. Abdulkhalil and Ahatkhon prayed regularly. This seemed to have been enough to brand them as the Islamists the Karimov government fears.

The Ferghana valley has been a base for the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), which the US and the UK say has links with al-Qaida. But the group is thought to have been crippled by the operations in Afghanistan. Analysts dismiss US claims that the IMU is targeting American military assets in the neighbouring republic of Kyrgyzstan. The fight against the IMU has been used to justify the repression of Islamists. But the Islamic order advocated by Hizb-ut-Tahrir fills a void left by devastating poverty and state brutality.

Craig Murray, the British ambassador to Uzbekistan, said: “The intense repression here combined with the inequality of wealth and absence of reform will create the Islamic fundamentalism that the regime is trying to quash.”

Another senior western official said: “People have less freedom here than under Brezhnev. The irony is that the US Republican party is supporting the remnants of Brezhnevism as part of their fight against Islamic extremism.”

The US is also funding some human rights groups in Uzbekistan. Last year it gave $26m towards democracy programmes. A state department spokesman said America’s policy was “reform through engagement” and that Uzbekistan had “taken some positive steps”, including “registering a human rights group and a new newspaper”. Matilda Bogner of Human Rights Watch’s office in Tashkent said: “I would deny there has been any real progress. The steps taken are basically window dressing used to get the military funding through the US Congress’s ethical laws. Nothing has changed on the ground.”

Hakimjon Noredinov, 68, agreed. He became a human rights activist after a morgue attendant brought him his eldest son, Nozemjon. He had been left for dead by the security service but was still alive despite having his skull fractured. Nozemjon is now 33, but screamed all night since they split his skull open. He is now in an asylum, Mr Noredinov said. “People’s lives here are no better for US involvement,” he said. “Because of the US help, Karimov is getting richer and stronger.”

The US is funding those it once condemned. Last year Washington gave Uzbekistan $500m (£300m) in aid. The police and intelligence services - which the state department's website says use "torture as a routine investigation technique" received $79m of this sum.

So much aid for such a brutal thug of a dictator. Karimov's regime is one of the most odious regimes in the region, having no respect for human rights and which continues to torture and murder thousands of it's opponents. Yet this butcher and his regime (including his police) get such handsome aid from the US government, because post 9/11 this thug has become so useful for American interests.

It is not America's responsibility to police every tinpot around the world. Only the ones which are of strategic interest to the US. Why is that so difficult to understand despite the 800 threads bemoaning the same dead issue.

Very true Kareem, but there are some on WA and in the World in general, who believe America is attempting to promote freedom in the World. Forgive the rest of us for trying to prove a point;)

usa has always been turning a blind eye to all tortures and anti people policies of givt that work for the american interests
there are many eg to proove it

:smiley: :biggthumb

But, yeah.. we defeated Hitlerism (aka fascism) “by the will of free peoples, by the strength of great alliances, and by the might of the United States of America.” SotU] That must be why we tolerate dictators like him? Gotta love the name though! Maybe that’s how we judge our dictators.. they gotta be cool, like comic book cool! That’s why we don’t say squat about Turkmenbashi either.. he named himself Father Turkmen, and then named days of the week and months after himself! Now that’s cool :k:

Can we get that guy from the Pink Panther cartoons to be our dictator in France? We need one there and I can’t think of who might make one fun enough…

Oh! dammitall! I forgot all about the torturous ßastard side of it.. boiling people?? That might be hard to top.. but by “the might of the United States of America” we can find one!

lolz @ your post, Spoon… Regarding Turkmenbashi - did he truly name the days of the week and months after himself? i read somewhere he is obsessed with enhancing a ‘cult’ image of himself (Stalin and Saddam Hussein style) within the society.

We could probably fill volumes regarding the atrocities committed by most of these central Asian dictators. i imagine, fifty years from now, in their history classes, European children will be taught about how certain dictatorships within that region were tolerated - and we will all probably solemnly state ‘never again’ - manifestly, only to repeat the same mistakes down the road.

Yup.. named one for his mother too :flower1: cos he’s a sweetie like that. Just about the only thing kids in school there learn about is him. He wrote a book (autobiographical) that is now the basis for just about everything. Really, it would be quite amusing if it weren’t so sick.

There are dozens of pigs like this. Most of them enjoy domestic legality and little to no expressed opposition.. does that mean the people love them and we are free to prop them up by buying their bananas? Hardly, if you ask me. But we do.

However, there are several good signs out there. The economic minorities are finally learning to express themselves and the powerhouses are starting to acknowledge their existence. I say give things 20 years, hope we don’t screw things up, and the world will probably be more equally integrated. If you treat people as peers rather than as vassals you get more response and less misbehaving.