US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

I doubt if he will be arrested but still this must be embarrassing for him.

US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence - The New Indian Express

NEW YORK: Ahead of his arrival in the US, a federal court here has issued summons against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his alleged role in the 2002 communal violence in Gujarat when he was the state’s chief minister.

The summons against Modi were issued yesterday by the US Federal Court for the Southern District of New York following a lawsuit filed by the New York-based American Justice Center (AJC), a non-profit human rights organisation, along with two survivors of the violence.

Modi is scheduled to arrive in New York today on his maiden US visit as prime minister.

During his five-day visit, Modi would address the annual UN General Assembly, the Indian-American community at Madison Square Garden in New York, and then travel to Washington to meet President Barack Obama on September 29 and 30.

Groups known for their anti-India activities have planned a series of demonstrations against him in both New York and Washington.

The lawsuit against Modi has been filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA).

Seeking compensatory and punitive damages, the 28-page complaint charges Modi with committing crimes against humanity, extra-judicial killings, torture and inflicting mental and physical trauma on the victims, mostly from the Muslim community.

“The Tort Case against Prime Minister Modi is an unequivocal message to human rights abusers everywhere,” said John Bradley, director at the AJC.

“Time and place and the trappings of power will not be an impediment to justice,” he said.

The Alien Tort Claims Act, also known as Alien Tort Statute (ATS), is a US federal law first adopted in 1789 that gives the federal courts jurisdiction to hear lawsuits filed by US residents for acts committed in violation of international law outside the US.

Reacting to the lawsuit in New Delhi, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad today said the government will examine the reported summons issued by the US court against Modi.

“We will examine it. I don’t know it. I am only hearing it from you. We will examine it,” Prasad told reporters here.

Meanwhile, an eminent Indian-American lawyer has said that the lawsuit is “dead on arrival”, arguing that Modi in his capacity as India’s head of state enjoys immunity status.

Given that the US State Department in a recent similar case against former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, had said that he enjoyed “immunity status” in his capacity as head of state, New York-based lawyer Ravi Batra has alleged that the lawsuit against Modi is a publicity stunt.

“That the case is dead on arrival on the law, or that Prime Minister Modi currently has head-of-state immunity is irrelevant to those who use lawsuits to generate only publicity and are equal opportunity haters of India no matter whom the Indians elect as part of India’s stunning democracy: Indian National Congress or the BJP,” Batra said.

The SFJ and AJC differed.

"Plaintiffs are invoking US laws which provide remedy to the victims of gross human rights violations.

The genocidal attacks on and organised killing of Muslims in 2002 under the leadership of Modi qualifies as tort under the US and international laws," argued Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, legal advisor, American Justice Center (AJC).

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

Can a US summon an Indian for a matter which is not concerned to Americans?

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

since Modi is the Prime Minister of India now, he has a chance to prove that under his rule minorities are safe and what happened in Gujrat was just a bad chapter in his life. he should at least accept the moral responsibility and ask for forgiveness from Muslims and then compensate the victims of the riots. only then we all can move on and work together towards the betterment of our country.

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

It is unfortunate that we are selective when it comes to championing the rights of minorities, as evidenced by the recent abstain / no vote. Do unto others.....

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

I was thinking the same thing.

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

The "no" vote doesn't mean yes to violence. Besides, I don't think homosexuals are categorised as a "minority" in Pakistan. Even it were, bringing them into limelight would create riots and violence against them.

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

Here is the text from the other thread. When a country abstain or votes no, it may not be voting "yes" to violence e against this group. But it sure is taking a position of indifference - callousness would fit better - wrt how members of said group are ill treated.

that gays are not an official "minority" in certain countries is a technicality. Hiding behind this don't pass the sniff test.

The argument that the reason said countries abstained /no vote is because of their concern this would initiate violence against this group is disingenuous. By that logic, no reforms wrt any minority should ever be considered for fear such minorities would be subject to more violence /discrimination.

"The 47-nation Human Rights Council resolution expressed “grave concern at acts of violence and discrimination, in all regions of the world, committed against individuals because of their sexual orientation and gender identity”.*

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights,” the council said, adding that tradition was no excuse for the violence and discrimination suffered by people worldwide due to their gender and sexual identity."

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

Ismailis are not openly declared non-muslim, whereas Ahmadis are. You can compare the violence acts committed against Ismaili community to Ahmadi community to deduce the level of the ingenuity of my reasoning.

You just can't openly declare homosexuals or bisexuals or whatever as a minority in a Muslim country...

Personally, I have lost faith in these so called human rights councils after Obama's open support of Israel.

Anyway, back to the topic (whatever it was).

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

Folks confuse human rights group with policy of a country. One could disagree with the latter while having respect for the former?

Topic I think is NAMO

Re: US Court Issues Summons Against Modi on 2002 Gujarat Violence

No they cannot but Amreekans like to play international cope wherever and whenever they can... But the bottom line is not that he is summoned by a US court BUT Amreekas Interest. At this time Amreeka wants India on its side to use it as a counterbalance to a growing China. Modi can do whatever he wants so long he stays in Amreekas good books.

Modi was denied Amreekas Visa because of Gujarat riots.