US behind Dubai Date b/w Mush & BB

Fraudia Jee, you were questioning that Rice stopped Musharraf from imposing Emergency.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/16/washington/16policy.html?ex=1344916800&en=6beea4d4ade3dc61&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

U.S. Is Prodding Pakistan Leader to Share Power

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15 — The Bush administration, struggling to find a way to keep Gen. Pervez Musharraf in power amid a deepening political crisis in Pakistan, is quietly prodding him to share authority with a longtime rival as a way of broadening his base, according to American and Pakistani officials.
General Musharraf, an important ally since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, has lost so much domestic support in recent months that American officials have gotten behind the idea that an alliance with Benazir Bhutto, a former prime minister, would be his best chance of remaining president.
The two met in an unannounced session in Abu Dhabi on July 27, but neither has publicly admitted to the meeting. Since then, many in Pakistan have heard the rumors and voiced their doubts about the workability and political wisdom of such a deal, and American officials concede that the proposed power-sharing could come with problems as well as benefits.
But after weeks of unrest in Pakistan, the American officials say a power-sharing agreement that might install Ms. Bhutto as prime minister could help defuse a confrontation in which General Musharraf has already flirted with invoking emergency powers. Administration officials have said they fear that General Musharraf could eventually be toppled and replaced by a leader who might be less reliable as a guardian of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and as an ally against terrorism.
Even if General Musharraf were to insist on remaining as the country’s military leader, American officials say that sharing power could bring a more democratic spirit to Pakistan, which has been a quasi-military dictatorship since 1999, when General Musharraf seized power and ousted Ms. Bhutto’s successor, Nawaz Sharif.
Even in supporting a power-sharing agreement, the American officials say they worried that any diminution of General Musharraf’s power could only complicate American counterterrorism efforts at a time when Al Qaeda is believed to be rebuilding in Pakistan’s tribal areas. They also say that Ms. Bhutto’s return could fuel Pakistani nationalism and kindle new calls for Pakistan to distance itself from Washington.
Ms. Bhutto has been holding talks in recent weeks with senior Bush administration officials, including Zalmay Khalilzad, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, with whom she met privately late last week. Administration officials have taken pains not to endorse a power-sharing agreement publicly, so as not to seem as if the United States is trying to influence Pakistani politics.
***But Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice](Condoleezza Rice - The New York Times) did discuss the idea of a power-sharing arrangement when she called General Musharraf last week at 2 a.m. in Pakistan to warn him not to declare emergency powers, American and Pakistani officials said. ***
Ms. Bhutto and General Musharraf have a personal history going back many years. He was her chief of military operations when she was prime minister, yet he has said repeatedly that she would not be allowed to return before the coming elections. In fact, one of the biggest obstacles to any possible deal is whether Ms. Bhutto would demand that General Musharraf relinquish his post as army chief of staff before agreeing to a power-sharing deal. Ms. Bhutto has said in the past that she would demand this, but there have been suggestions in Pakistan in recent days that in order to salvage a deal, she may be willing to concede that point.
Several Bush administration officials agreed to talk about the American role in the discussions but refused to speak for the record because of the delicacy of the talks.
American officials say that the complexity of Pakistani politics makes it difficult to predict what shape a political deal could take. But a first step could be a decision by General Musharraf to allow open parliamentary elections next month, because Ms. Bhutto’s party now appears poised to win the largest share of the vote.
A victory by her party could pave the way for Ms. Bhutto to become prime minister, but she would probably need General Musharraf’s support to overcome further obstacles, including a law prohibiting former prime ministers from returning to that office. In turn, Ms. Bhutto’s support could be crucial to helping General Musharraf to victory in subsequent presidential elections that would allow him to stay in his current job.
Both leaders have faced a backlash within their parties as they explained the details to members. Members of the governing party, the Pakistan Muslim League, which backs General Musharraf, are furious at the possibility that, after attacking Ms. Bhutto for nearly eight years, the general is considering dropping court actions against her and offer her a share in power.
In an interview with The New York Times on Monday, Ms. Bhutto said that she was aware that an alliance with the now-weakened General Musharraf could hurt her politically.
“We want to avoid a situation where we are seen as bailing out an unpopular military dictatorship,” said Ms. Bhutto, who has been living in London and Dubai. She said the pace of the talks between General Musharraf and her Pakistan People’s Party was too slow, with him making promises that he has not kept.

Re: US behind Dubai Date b/w Mush & BB

thanks for the update ...................... i was so dying to know

Re: US behind Dubai Date b/w Mush & BB

lol sooo the story leaks after an almost two year effort to keep the US role off the radar. With Tony Blair out of the equation it's primarily a US effort via the Emirates who were brokering these talks.

The internal divide within Mushy supporters is quite interesting, the Chorys are desperately trying to broaden the "talks" to include groups they are closer too..PML-N and JUI in particular. The backlash is also mounting as you can see with the surprisingly good show the APDM made in Pindi..

Re: US behind Dubai Date b/w Mush & BB

NY times is a known lifta (read leftie) rag, long used by the Pakistani liftas in order to push their commie and show-shaw-list agenda.

These liftas do not hide their utter hatred for Pakistan and by gollie even petty rumors form Washington DC are used to throw dirt on Pak army.

I mean a minor student of Pakistan politics realizes that PM BB, and PM NS should not sit and sulk on the sidelines. This only leaves the political field wide open for Mullahs and other fascists.

Whatever the case may be, it is good for Pakistan to have its powerful elite to work together for the betterment of the country.

Just go back to 1999, military wasn't in the picture when PM BB, Mullahs, and MQM threatened nay conspired to start pahayya jaam (wheel stoppage) movements across the country. PM NS got overly defensive, confused and resorted on attacking the constitution, Supreme court, and ultimately the army.

The same thing can be said about PM NS using all the ploys against PM BB's government.

These politikos must realize that Pakistan is "very very large" rather "huge" country with tonnes of geo-strategic responsibility. So our leaders should not treat us and our country as a third rate, poverty stricken sewer aka Somalia or Afghanistan.

To respect Pakistan, is to sit and work together. I hope politikos now understand it. I doubt it though. Events of July in Karachi, or the suicidal maniac mullah actions are a clear sign that we'll remain dependent on army for a long time to come.

Still PM BB, PM NS, Chaudhrys and Khans should all respect each other. And if US shows interest in encouraging this positive atmosphere, so be it. But liftas will make a "disgusting Republican" Condi as their new goddess, just to rubbish Prez. Musharraf.

Down with the liftas.

Re: US behind Dubai Date b/w Mush & BB

Oh yes, Britain and the US are quite active behind the scenes. Condi is in contact with BB and favouring her ada saeen :--D...