US Afghan envoy angers Pakistan

Source:BBC NEWS | South Asia | US Afghan envoy angers Pakistan

Pakistan has angrily denounced comments made by the US ambassador to Afghanistan that America may move against “terrorists” based in Pakistan.
Pakistan’s information minister said the army could deal with the problem and the comments were “harmful”.

He said Pakistan would never allow foreign troops on its soil.

Islamabad has repeatedly rejected Afghan complaints that it is not doing enough to stop cross-border raids by al-Qaeda and Taleban remnants.

Correspondents say the issue of American troops being deployed in Pakistan is extremely sensitive and likely to be deeply unpopular among most of the public.

‘Irresponsible’

US Ambassador to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad sparked the row on Monday when he said that America could not allow “terrorist sanctuaries” in Pakistan to “fester indefinitely”.

We are the country that has delivered the best results in this war… our progress is far better than anybody

Pakistan Information Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed
He said one of the greatest worries for the US was the fact that the Taleban and other hostile groups continue to use Pakistan as a base in which they train and operate.

“We have told the Pakistani leadership that either they must solve this problem or we will do it for ourselves,” Mr Khalilzad said in a speech to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think-tank.

Mr Khalilzad said that Washington would prefer Islamabad to deal with the problem, and that the Pakistani government had agreed.

“We are prepared to help President Musharraf,” he said, “because one way or another the problem will have to be dealt with.”

One way or the other the problem will have to be dealt with

US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad

But Pakistani Information Minister Sheikh Ahmed Rashid said the army was fully capable of “confronting terrorists” and it was not necessary for US troops to cross the border from Afghanistan.

Pakistani troops “have sacrificed their lives in fulfilling their pledge to combat terrorists”, he said.

"We do not need anybody in our territories - neither can permission be given to anyone.

"These kind of irresponsible statements can create political problems for us.

“We are the country that has delivered the best results in this war… our progress is far better than anybody.”

‘Unwarranted’ comments

The information minister also said that there were no training facilities for the Taleban in Afghanistan, and that Pakistan supported the government of President Hamid Karzai and shared information with US intelligence.

Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesman Jalil Abbas Jilani also criticised the ambassador’s comments, describing them as “unwarranted”.
Pakistan says it is doing its utmost to stop cross-border attacks

“Perhaps Ambassador Khalilzad is not aware of the position of his government on the subject,” he said, “which greatly appreciated Pakistan’s efforts in eliminating and rooting out the terrorists’ infrastructure.”

It is not the first time that the US Afghanistan ambassador has been at the centre of a row - last month he also irritated Islamabad by saying that al-Qaeda fugitives were launching attacks into Afghanistan from Pakistani soil.

The war of words comes as the US steps up patrols along the rugged border of Afghanistan with Pakistan in an attempt to catch al-Qaeda and Taleban militants.

Last month, Pakistan launched a huge offensive against suspected militants, and tribesmen sheltering them, in the semi-autonomous area of South Waziristan. It says more than 60 suspects were killed and 160 captured.


Why did that pompus moronic idiot make such comments, just who dose he think he is? Is he blind…???

^ Did you really think a Super power like the US believes anyone can do the job better than them? They want Usama Bin LAden and even if their intelligence is wrong(again) do you really think they will stop at the Tribal areas?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
^ Did you really think a Super power like the US believes anyone can do the job better than them? They want Usama Bin LAden and even if their intelligence is wrong(again) do you really think they will stop at the Tribal areas?
[/QUOTE]

True, but they will eventually enter in such a way that the Pakistani Government (Their puppets) will welcome them with open arms, and miscreate another atmosphere of lies within the people, like they have beein doing with their foriegn policies.

US has a simple policy of bomb and forget. Pakistan has to live with these people. So our policy has to account for that. Is Khalilzad the US Ambassador to Afghanistan or Afghan Ambassador to US?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Khilaari: *
Is Khalilzad the US Ambassador to Afghanistan or Afghan Ambassador to US?
[/QUOTE]
Haha, that made me chuckle. He might be both.

But do you folks deny that there are terrorists in Pakistan?

This will be another repeat of sept 11 incident when Americans where already in islamabad airport and other airports after few days and the musharraf government said there are no Amerikkkans here!

I think eventually, Musharraf would cave in and allow US troops in to FATA. Of course Sheikh Rashid sahib will keep blabbering nonsense for media consumption.

Imdad,

It is not a question of saying that there are no terrorists in Pakistan. It is a question of who has a say in what goes on in our territory.

zalmay may have an american passport but his heart shows the same hatred brought on by inferiority complex as some of his other brethren in afghanistan.

The logic is ridiculous, well i mean after all it s coming from zalmay so no surprise. How does this sound...lets say the terrorists are going back and forth between afghanistan and pakistan. If they secure that side of the border no one is going to be able to move back and forth. Now if they cant do it, that is their own failure.

Zalmay is prolly pissed due to losses suffered by his drug trading family and friends earlier

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
zalmay may have an american passport but his heart shows the same hatred brought on by inferiority complex as some of his other brethren in afghanistan.

The logic is ridiculous, well i mean after all it s coming from zalmay so no surprise. How does this sound...lets say the terrorists are going back and forth between afghanistan and pakistan. If they secure that side of the border no one is going to be able to move back and forth. Now if they cant do it, that is their own failure.

Zalmay is prolly pissed due to losses suffered by his drug trading family and friends earlier
[/QUOTE]

Pir Sahib, I had the great displeasure of being in company of Khalilzad. The man speaks out of his @$$ and has dabbled in all sorts of legal and illegal ventures, yet tries to come across like a career academic.

The funny thing is that he is the chief US lapdog to Afghanistan yet somehow feels compelled to make these statements, I wonder what his boss (Powell) has to say about this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/international/europe/05SPIEGEL.html

There is an article in NY Times which is a translation of an German article.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Spock: *

True, but they will eventually enter in such a way that the Pakistani Government (Their puppets) will welcome them with open arms, and miscreate another atmosphere of lies within the people, like they have beein doing with their foriegn policies.
[/QUOTE]

Are those words come out of your mouth? wow.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *

**zalmay may have an american passport but his heart shows the same hatred brought on by inferiority complex as some of his other brethren in afghanistan.

The logic is ridiculous, well i mean after all it s coming from zalmay so no surprise. How does this sound...lets say the terrorists are going back and forth between afghanistan and pakistan. If they secure that side of the border no one is going to be able to move back and forth. Now if they cant do it, that is their own failure.

Zalmay is prolly pissed due to losses suffered by his drug trading family and friends earlier**
[/QUOTE]

Well said.

The drug warlord Zalmay has now backtracked on his, after his comments were slapped down by the US State Department.

I’d look for an oil connection.

Zalmay Khalilzad is a 100% oil man. He had a big role in the UNOCAL deal with the Taliban and turned against Talibans only after that deal fell through.

My bet is that he is pi$$ed because of some oil deal gone sour.

Just look at his comments today, withdrawing the statements he made yesterday. Must have received his monthly spanking from his boss Colin Powell :hehe:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by RajputFury: *

Pir Sahib, I had the great displeasure of being in company of Khalilzad. The man speaks out of his @$$ and has dabbled in all sorts of legal and illegal ventures, yet tries to come across like a career academic.

The funny thing is that he is the chief US lapdog to Afghanistan yet somehow feels compelled to make these statements, I wonder what his boss (Powell) has to say about this.
[/QUOTE]

Yay finally a good post, what a total idiot. You know my granddad once told said: One should look at your own back yard before you glare at your neighbours.. "Afghanistan is a **** HOLE and he wants pakistan to end up the same, KEEP DREAMING!!! my guess is that he is an Indian Puppet!!!

RF, Malik and Khilaari

Thanks for the added info. Anyone who scratches teh surface would know that Zalmay is as corrupt as they go. he should be taken off as an envoy and assigned to cook chappli kebaba for visiting dignitaries.

His only loyalty was, is, and will be to money. Powell may want to review his credentials a little bit more.