Unite, or be defeated

Some very interesting thoughts from the Islamic conference arranged this past week in Malaysia by President Mahathir Muhammad, which saw respected Muslim scholars attend to participate from around the world.

i found the following quote very interesting. It’s been what i have been feeling towards this Forum as well - we keep bickering amongst each other over minute issues when we’re losing the larger picture of our own precious faith.

World Conference Of Islamic Scholars: Promote true Islamic teachings, ulama urged, 10 July 2003

Commenting on Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s speech, Islamic scholars attending the conference said misinterpretation of the religion by wayward ulama was weakening and promoting infighting within the ummah.

General director of the Centre for Fiqh Research in Sudan Professor Sheikh Tigani Hassan said ulama who preached extremism and who used their influence to mislead the young should be eliminated as they posed a threat. He said there were many “imposter” ulama today who intentionally interpreted the religion to suit their own ends. “The ulama are the catalysts between the ummah and society’s top decision-makers. Unfortunately, some ulama are misleading the public through their preaching and this widens the gap between the public and society’s decision-makers.” Tigani said it fell upon the ulama to be guided by their conscience and the true injunctions of Islam to use their influence responsibly and not for personal gain.

“The ball is in the ulama’s court, as they are the ones who connect the two levels of society, the masses and its leaders.” International University of Lebanon vice-chancellor Husamuddine Quaraqirah said it was the ulama’s responsibility to enlighten the ummah, promote the true teachings of Islam and help Muslims distinguish between the good and the bad.

"People must distinguish between ulama who preach true Islam such as those who promote peace, understanding and good relations between Muslims, and those who readily describe Muslims as blasphemous because the former do not agree with the latter’s beliefs.

“There are extremists in Muslim society who think that they are right and others are blasphemous. This is wrong and society must distinguish between the two - between those who interpret the religion only to divide Muslims and those working for unity.” Dean of Postgraduate Studies for the International Islamic University Associate Professor Dr Zaleha Kamaruddin said ulama should use the conference as a platform to formulate mechanisms to unite Muslims.

Zaleha, one the speakers, said ulama should clear misconceptions among the ummah, especially those beliefs which had divided the community.

“The ummah has been infiltrated by certain groups of people whose only purpose is to divide Muslims and make them fight each other. We should be wary of these groups and expunge them and their beliefs.” On Dr Mahathir’s call for Muslims to pursue knowledge and fulfil their collective obligations (fardhu kifayah), Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation Professor Dr Ala’eddin Kharofa said there was a need for Muslims to pursue worldly knowledge such as medicine and science, as such expertise was needed in society.

“Even in the Quran, it states that not everyone has to be an expert in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), because if everyone is, then who is going to tend to the sick or who is going to build the cities?” Husamuddine said there should be a balance between the pursuit of collective obligations and personal obligations (fardhu ain). “The key to developing the ummah is the balancing of these two.”

Other links:

Time to take on those misusing religion, 11 July 2003

Scholars debate future of Islam, Jonathan Kent, BBC, 11 July 2003

Yes Muslims need to be united. No one has destroyed muslims, but they destroyed themselves and it is quite evident from the history of Islam.

Whenever it comes to the downfall of muslims, i always suggest everyone to read the period of Islamic History in Spain and also the 300 years of bloody crusade wars.

If muslims would have wanted, they could have easily kicked those christian crusaders out in the matter of days, but they hated each other so much and also because of the hunger of the power didn't let them unite themselves.

Though they got Palestine back and interestingly enough all the muslim sultans of middle east opposed Sultan Saladin and sided with the christians. Funny Isn't?

However, still it took them roughly around 100 more years after Saladin when they completed kicked the crusaders out of the region.

There is nothing such nationalism in Islam, whenever this nationalism factor came in to play it had always torn apart the muslims.

Why go all the way back in the history? Take the example of pakistan itself. From its beginning, we started to discriminated the east completely and always thought of them as inferior race. Furthermore, instead of taking pride as a pakistani or as a muslim we started to take pride in being punjabi, mohajjir or whatever.

Yes there is a need of unity, but we also have to beware of muslim wanna bees.

They are also the ones because of which islam has suffered through out its history We should not let any one fabricate Islam or try to harm the unity of the muslims.

The 'Unity of the Ummah' is a dream that'll probably never come true. The very day prophet Mohammad died, the Ummah divided into two groups and started quarelling over which group the Caliph should belong to. Since then the history of the Ummah has been full of conspiracies and bloodshed.

And the history of the Ummah is witness, whenever the 'Ulema' have been given political or social importance, they have always caused harm to the society and religion.

[quote]
"Misinterpretation of the religion by wayward ulama was weakening and promoting infighting within the ummah."
[/quote]

This very quote means the even the Ulema at this conference were only busy calling each other 'wayward'.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Paaga| |nsaan: *
The 'Unity of the Ummah' is a dream that'll probably never come true. The very day prophet Mohammad died, the Ummah divided into two groups and started quarelling over which group the Caliph should belong to. Since then the history of the Ummah has been full of conspiracies and bloodshed.

*And the history of the Ummah is witness, whenever the 'Ulema' have been given political or social importance, they have always caused harm to the society and religion. *

This very quote means the even the Ulema at this conference were only busy calling each other 'wayward'.
[/QUOTE]

Name one instance.

Nice, but Mahatir is the biggest idiot and staunch anti-Semite there can ever be. The guy’s a Joker, and should not be taken seriously. It’s people like him that harm Islam more than Mullahs. Mullahs are very transparent and everyone can see what they are about, but politicians like Mahatir abuse Islam for their own dirty purposes.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Lajawab: *

Name one instance.
[/QUOTE]

From the clash of the Ulema against the Iranian bureaucracy in the Abbasid Caliphate, when they came up with the new concept of 'implementation of shariyyah' in order to bring the caliph under their own control, to the MMA government in the NWFP after the previous election, the history is full of instances of how Ulema have cause great harm to the society and religion. Which one do you want me to narrate?