UK: Public demands aid cut to India

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

What difference could you make even if you cared ?

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

lol,

Indians told them no need, it's the british giving to 3 backward states for their gains.

Check in daily mail, india said no problem if they stop aid, it's more of uk wanting to give india, like for mmrca deal (euro fighter)

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

lolz...... dream on!!!

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

What dream on

280 million pound lolz

Do you know india donated 5billion usd to african countries, around 2billion to afghanistan.it spends 35-40 billion on defence every year. A billon on space program.it's not lack of funds but corruption from ministers to low level government employee.

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

India tells UK to turn off the aid tap already

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

:rotfl:
Asif bhai sahab, sarcasm is lost of few people. As I said, he is new in the USA and still learning the language, soon he will understand,..

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

300 million pounds a year which make roughly half a billion dollar every year in aid, and that too only by UK.

Qurbaan jaaiye aisi masoomiat par.... Why is India simply ACCEPTING the aid? She could politely tell to give this aid to poor countries of Africa, instead of ACCEPTING it?

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

your apology accepted too :hehe:

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

As we have seen, Indians are quite good in ACCEPTING.

Especially if it is charity (aid). :hehe:

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

^^ yes , true. even if the donor ask as to kill our our brothers or sell our countryman we do it as well for some money.

:D

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

^^ so you are implying that the economic "super power" India is just hot air?

In fact she is just like any other poor country and is very happily ready to accept any charity given to it?

tsk tsk... too bad

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

^^ Apology accepted again. Cant help but pity your whining.
:hehe:

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

Seeing the UK is a £ trillion pounds in debt I hardly think they are in a position to give aid to any Country really.

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

Now India should give aid to UK!

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

Just because India spends $40B in defense doesn't mean India is economically rich. Let us compare indian cities to chinese cities and find out.

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

1) India does not spent $40B on defence
2) There is no comparasion between China and India except population
3) Indians live in complete denial no matter what
4) Don't waste time and Save bandwidth
5) Thankooo

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

^^

that defence budget is just 2.5 percent of total annual budget.yes india has lot of poor people.that doesn't mean government is poor or lack of funds, it's more of funds not reaching poor,corruption from ministers to low level government officials

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

check this, one of user from another forums on below poverty line

See poverty figures in India are hard to track and verify since there's so much more to it than what meets the eye. Firstly, in India, whenever govt. officials go door-to-door checking people's assets and poverty numbers, they are almost always fed lower than real income and assets. This is because a higher income would mean that you are above the poverty line and hence not entitled to the govt. benefits that are meant for a poor person. For eg. a BPL family receives grains, cooking oil and other essential supplies at much lower prices from the govt. One is also entitled to loans at lesser interest rates if you're poor. So if you are above the line, you wont get any of these benefits. So families knowing deflate and under-report their income levels to qualify as BPL family. This was also brought out by a recent study where a person masqueraded as a survey guy and enquired about income levels from rural families. Almost everybody sold their condition as desperate and poor. But when the same survey guy also talked about a probable matrimonial alliance with that family the people would turn around and talk about their assets and income hidden away from the govt.

Second, corruption and bureaucratic mal-intentions also aid the inflation of poverty numbers. Officers in charge of public distribution system routinely siphon off supplies meant for the poor in the free market. If there are less poor,these officers would get lesser grains to steal and hence lesser opportunity for them to make money. Hence, these guys too have an interest in inflating the numbers. Related to this is the example of state governments and district administration. A district/state with larger number of poor is always assured of greater aids and grants from the central govt, WB etc. And in most cases a poor state has lesser income and smaller funds to spend since its poor and central aid comprises the majority of its public spending. So if it shows lesser number of poor it stands to lose central aid and funds. Again the corruption angle comes in here as well. More central funds, more money for the state minsters and district collectors to steal.

Thirdly, that figure of $2 is not as low as it might seem to you in the developed world. It translates to roughly Rs 100 per day. And even by India's high inflationary standards Rs 100 is enough a amount for a person to feed himself for a day, especially in rural areas. Hell, I live in Gurgaon, amongst the costliest places in India. If I wanted, I could live off Rs. 90 or $1.8 for a day simply by eating Idlis 3 times a day from the corner shop. The guy sells awesome Idlis, a plate just for 30 bucks. So remember western standards and economic estimates work differently in developing countries.Again, I do not mean to color everything bright and say that there are no poor in India. There are huge disparities and shocking income gaps. Taking the same food example. Right next to the Idli shop there's a restaurant that sells continental food prices at Rs. 300 a dish. One can easily spend Rs. 800 per person there. And there are people who go to this restaurant.

The challenge for India is to lessen these gaps and set a basic standard of economic and social opportunity for everybody. A person doesn't mind being poor as long as he gets the opportunity to come out of it and is assured of his rights. This sadly is what we need to ensure and is precisely the cause for problems like Naxalism.

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

So you are telling me that people like to live in slums even when they have the means to live better? Aik to desi logon ko desholli bohat marni hoti hai! I think this is the reason China is going up while S. Asia is still down! :hehe:

PS $40B is 2.5% of budget? I guess you meant 2.5% of GDP PPP as your stat would mean that india has a budget of close to $2 trillion dollars ($1.6 trillion give or take to be exact).

Re: UK: Public demands aid cut to India

yes it could be purchasing power.check this article for more details.

m.timesofindia.com/home/union-budget-2011/Highlights-of-Union-Budget-2011-2012/articleshow/7592642.cm

also iam not saying there is no poverty but 800 millions of indian population is below poverty line is little bit exaggerated.and slums exists mainly in cities, not in rural or towns.also compare to last 5 years number of come down.