Re: Two sides of same coin
^ So the OP is correct, religious people DO use tales. Atheists using heads is qualified by human discovery 'so far'.
I don't understand what's so wrong about it. Why religious people get so defensive about using 'tales' instead of 'heads'?. One can easily argue that God, so far, is beyond human intellect just as radio waves, electromagnetic waves, infrared light etc were beyond human scientific understanding only 500 years ago.
Even the word 'faith' says that you have to put rationality aside for a while. Lets assume that we lived in a world where God could be seen and heard directly by human beings. Belief in God in such a situation would not be called 'faith'. It would just be a rational decision.
Well it is sort of right ... Atheists use heads but they want us religious people to concede that we use tales ...
I would say atheists imagine with their heads and religious inherit a a legacy of highly referenced information ...
So on one hand heads seems superior to tales ... but on the other hand they use their head to "imagine" and we accept "evidence - in the form of information that can be proved to be authentic" ...