TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

TV channel’s sting ‘reveals’ divided Indian team

Indian cricket appeared to be heading for another controversy with a TV channel broadcasting what it claimed were revelations by the national selectors of infighting, ego-driven politics and factionalism in the dressing room.
The “revelations” were part of a sting operation carried out by Headlines Today and its Hindi sister channel, Aaj Tak, which spoke to four national selectors - Ranjib Biswal, Bhupinder Singh, Sr, Venkatapathy Raju and Sanjay Jagdale, the last-named also the team manager at the World Cup.
There were two broad themes to the revelations in the sting: factionalism within the team, and Greg Chappell’s performance as coach.
“Greg wanted to show everybody he is the boss. He was not happy with anybody,” Bhupinder Singh sr, the North Zone selector, was quoted as saying. “There were instances when Chappell was not talking to senior players for 4-5 days. He was not on talking terms with Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag and Harbhajan Singh. It happened in South Africa (where India toured in December-January).”
He also said that Chappell adopted a “divide and rule policy” and was the additional ego in a team full of egos.
“Greg could not understand Indian cricketers’ psyche. He was more like a schoolmaster than a friend,” Ranjib Biswal, the East Zone selector, said.
The sting also raised alleged problems that Dravid had with Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly. They were not supporting Dravid, says Bhupinder; some players were backing Tendulkar, some Ganguly. “They are sensing (sic) that if he fails then we have a chance to become captain.”
“I won’t call it factionalism but there were some personal problems,” said Sanjay Jagdale, who was also quoted as saying that Sreesanth and Zaheer Khan had fought in the dressing room.
The sting also featured Niranjan Shah, the board’s secretary, who spoke on the role of sponsorship and endorsements. “Endorsement money is so huge, there is a chance of a grey area. They will get money if they are in the team, otherwise they won’t. That’s why. it [pressure from sponsors to retain them] may be there. That’s why the board has said only three endorsements per player.”
The Board for Control of Cricket in India was yet to react officially to the revelations. “Let me watch the whole thing and then I will comment,” one top BCCI official told Cricinfo. “In these sting operations video and audio can sometimes be doctored so we have to wait and see whether these are authentic or not. It would not be correct for the BCCI to make any comment at this stage.”

Re: TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

Can of worms...?

Re: TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

Jab ek hi Ullu Kaafi hai barbad Gulistan karne ko
Har Shakh pe ullu baitha hai, Anjaam-e-gulistan kya hoga

Re: TV channel’s sting ‘reveals’ divided Indian team

kya hoga?

jo howa

WC kay pehlay hee round mein out ho gaya.:teary1:

Re: TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

Indian team is passing through the exact same phase Pakistan went through after 2003 WC. Out in first round, too many "super" stars ....egos....gossips...etc etc !

Re: TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

There is too much money....too little talent.
This is the present reality of Indian Cricket.

Unlike in Pak, where Gen Mush can take a jharoo and clean up the mess in seconds if he wanted to - in India, BCCI is too independent for its own good....and the good of Cricket in the country.

My only hope is the MEDIA and STING OPERATIONS such as this - to uncover all the filthy going-ons.....if it was not for Tehelka/Outlook - Azharuddin may still be playing and throwing matches.

Re: TV channel's sting 'reveals' divided Indian team

It is same as Pakistan. When these national selectors saw the rift between coach and team, they should have stepped in. Now it is too late and sounds childish. I doubt Greg will stay quite, expect a "tell all" book very soon.

Did Coach Wright not reveal something similar when he left the coaching job?