Re: Trigger-happy in Baghdad - US troops butcher unarmed firefighters
You have no idea what you are talking about. You obviously have no comprehension of the level of brutality of Saddam. How many Genocides does a dictator get? How long would the Muslim world have allowed Saddam to continue? Just a brief refresher boys, because the “good old days” are taking on a real rosy glow here:
Several thousand Kurdish villages were destroyed, forcing residents to live in appalling camps. In at least 40 cases, Iraqi forces under Saddam’s cousin, Ali Hassan al-Majid, used chemical weapons to kill and chase Kurds from their villages. Then, during the Anfal campaign from February to September 1988, Iraqi troops swept through the highlands of Iraqi Kurdistan rounding up everyone who remained in government-declared “prohibited zones.” **Some 100,000 Kurds, mostly men and boys, were trucked to remote sites and executed. Only seven are known to have escaped. **
**The full scope of the Anfal horror became known only after Saddam’s defeat in the Gulf War. **The Iraqi military’s withdrawal from the region in October 1991 after the imposition of a no-fly zone made it feasible for the first time in years for outsiders to reach the area.
Human Rights Watch investigators took advantage of this opening to enter northern Iraq and document Saddam’s crimes. Some 350 witnesses and survivors were interviewed. Mass graves were exhumed. And Kurdish rebels were convinced to hand over some **18 tons of documents that they had seized during the brief post-war uprising from Iraqi police stations. These documents were airlifted to Washington, where Human Rights Watch researchers poured through this treasure trove of information about the inner workings of a ruthless regime. **
With this extraordinarily detailed evidence of genocide, Human Rights Watch launched a campaign to bring Saddam to justice. At the time the U.N. Security Council was creating special tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, but there was no consensus for similar action on Iraq. France and Russia, each with extensive business interests in Iraq, threatened to wield their veto. China, worried about analogies to its treatment of Tibetans, was disinclined to support an International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq. With no International Criminal Court then in the works, and the Pinochet option of exercising universal jurisdiction in national courts not yet widely recognized, the prospect of criminal prosecution was remote.
We should have gone to war with Saddam based on the above paragraph, not WMD. The WMD however was the only rational that could have been backed by China, France and Russia. The same people who did the killing for Saddam are doing the killing now. The Shia have adopted their tactics. Saddam gave birth to a society where the most brutal rule.
How many Genocides does a dictator get before you guys call for his fall? The Muslim world should have been enraged. Instead you ended up against the US, and are now supporting genocide as a way of controlling murderous masses of Muslims.
Very Cool. You guys are geniuses.