Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Grace under fire
Dileep Premachandran
September 26, 2007

After they had dominated vast tracts of the match, darkness suddenly appeared to be setting on India’s World Twenty20 dream. Matthew Hayden and Andrew Symonds, two of the hardest hitters of a cricket ball ever to swagger on to a field, were making mincemeat of the bowling, and Australia needed just 60 from six overs with wickets in hand. For Mahendra Singh Dhoni it was time to take a call, one that would decide the outcome of the game either way.
Sreesanth had been the outstanding bowler in the game, bowling his first three overs for just six runs - a magical spell that included the wicket of Adam Gilchrist. Bringing him back for his final over was fraught with risk, especially since RP Singh had gone for plenty in his opening spell. But the fifth-bowler options, Joginder Sharma and Virender Sehwag, had been carted for 51 from three overs, and Dhoni had little choice but to put all his chips on Sreesanth and hope for the best.
When Symonds flicked an errant delivery for four to fine leg, Dhoni wasn’t unduly flustered. The main event was to come. Sreesanth had troubled Hayden incessantly in his opening spell, swinging the ball back into the pads or tempting him to drive, but the moment Hayden took strike in the 15th over, the plan changed. Sreesanth was coming round the wicket, reprising the tactics used so successfully by England’s bowlers in the 2005 Ashes.
The first ball, fast and straight, took out off stump, and the frenzied celebrations from bowler and captain spoke of two men who had called the dealer’s bluff and prevailed. Symonds followed soon after, and India were more or less home. But Dhoni had one last quirky act up his sleeve.
With Michael Hussey needing 22 from the last over, Dhoni tossed the ball to Joginder Sharma, a proven domestic performer with no international pedigree to speak of. Perhaps inspired by his captain’s faith, Sharma bowled an impeccable over, and Hussey and friends got nowhere close to completing Mission Impossible.
That must have been in Dhoni’s mind when he called on Sharma to bowl the most important over of his life on Monday. India had more than seven fingers on the trophy by the time Misbah-ul-Haq set about Harbhajan Singh, but after Sreesanth proved profligate, too, only 13 were needed from the final over.
Harbhajan was one option that Dhoni had, but he was well aware that Misbah had tonked him for five sixes over two games. Sharma’s lack of pace and his ability to bowl full deliveries made him the more attractive option, but Dhoni must have known what the repercussions would be if his gamble of no-name over proven performer failed.
His treatment of Sharma in the two biggest matches of the tournament summed up his qualities as captain. You or I could toss the ball to a Wasim Akram or a Curtly Ambrose and calmly watch a match clinched in the final over. It requires no great leadership quality or tactical nous.
The real test of captaincy lies in bringing the fringe player into the centre circle and making him feel that he’s not a misfit there. It’s almost certain that no other Indian captain of the last decade and more would have dared go with Sharma for those final overs. By doing so Dhoni was emphasising sport’s greatest but often forgotten truth - it’s not about the stars, it’s about the XI. And sometimes the unlikeliest ones shine brightest.
Ravi Shastri and others with access to the team have spoken of the wonderful spirit and camaraderie within the ranks. That, too, should be no surprise. Dhoni is not a controversial figure. Not for him the world of cliques and Chinese whispers and Brutus stabs. Even when Indian cricket was on its downward spiral into hell, he stayed aloof from much of the nonsense, refusing to take sides and doing his own thing. You can tell that many of his players respect him for it.

His press conferences have been a delight, peppered with frank answers, a ready smile, and an absolute refusal to put too much pressure on individuals like Yuvraj Singh [after his six sixes]. Yet, when he has needed to, he has also taken a stand. Sreesanth was superb with the ball against Australia, but as his captain’s mild bollocking afterwards suggested, he needed to focus more on his bowling and less on auditioning for some Ace Ventura movie.
It helped that Dhoni led by example with the bat, sometimes eschewing his monstrous hitting for a more circumspect approach. On the field he never scowled or glared at his players, preferring instead to run down the pitch and have a quiet word if he thought someone was feeling the pressure.
His aggressive nature was best seen in the field placements. India didn’t just sit back and aim to stifle. They attacked and went for wickets, with a slip in and the inner ring hustling the batsmen rather than out on the periphery. And with the exception of RP Singh and Sreesanth, who usually bowled the first six overs, the other bowlers were switched around frequently.
In the final Dhoni gave Yusuf Pathan, another fringe player, an over early on in Pakistan’s reply. He conceded just five runs, but then wasn’t seen again as brother Irfan and Sharma killed off any semblance of momentum.
Greg Chappell, under whom Dhoni enjoyed his most prolific spell as a batsman, always rated his leadership credentials, saying that he had the gambler’s streak that set the fine captains apart from the ordinary ones. “He’s not reckless,” Chappell used to say. “Some of the shots he plays may seem outrageous and risky, but I can assure you he’s usually weighed up the options. He knows what he’s doing.”
More than anything else, though, it’s Dhoni’s zest for life and the game that sets him apart. Like the Joginders of this world he has come up the hard way, and is determined to enjoy every moment in India colours. Both his predecessors suffered when the joy went out of their games, when captaincy and being out in the middle stopped being fun. Somehow you can’t see that happening to Dhoni.

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/columns/content/current/story/312575.html

Pretty good article on Dhoni’s leadership.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

http://specials.rediff.com/cricket/2007/sep/26video4.htm
:smack:lol at MS Dhoni’s pronounciation of sreesanth
remembers me the dialogue of Nana patekar in Ab tak chapan" movie
Ki North Indians ko Names pronounce karna nahi atta

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Yes, Dhoni showed some good skills as Captain....but this above quote is a load of crap.

Having Joginder bowl the last over against Aus and Pak was no stroke of Genius on Dhoni's part. It was more out of compulsion. Really, what were Dhoni's choices I would like to know.

In fact he tried to keep away Joginder in the Semi-finals (rightly so) by having Sehwag bowl...but when Sehwag too went for runs....and everybody else's quota was over...he had no other choice but to have Joginder bowl the last over.

Same thing in finals...his other choice was Harbhajan who was just tonked for 3 SIXES...and spin in the last over would have been easy pickings.

It will be interesting to see how long this "love affair" of Indian Media with "Dhoni's kaptaani" last. They are clearly going overboard. Nothing succeeds like success I guess.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

cant agree anymore

Had Misbah successfully hit that shot he tried, same writer would have been calling "giving ball to Joginder" Dhoni's biggest mistake !

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Exactly.....I have no doubts in my mind about it.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

thats true

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Indian columinst and media means SH!T. They just prove over and over that they over react on everything.
Tendilza sneezes, front page 8 column headline.
Dhoni puts anti-lice in his hair, AajTak broadcasts this event live for 3 hours.

Test cricket is not going away. It will remain there. Let T20 be like weekend basketball/baseball games.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

I agree some of these example are over the top. Some of his tukkas worked.They could have easily not worked.

But I think Dhoni did a very good job of using his resources, being agressive on field and never showed sign of being under pressure or tense. Also I liked the fact that he always gives credit to all his guys not only when he is speaking but also in his action during game or celebrations.

If Dravid or Ganguly were captain during those tense matches they would have already eaten their fingers along with nails.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Dhoni did not (and cant) do it coz he wear gloves :D

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Yes...I was impressed with Dhoni's skills too. But some of the things that the media is saying about him...is way over the top....not logical at all.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

LOL ! Exactly what I was thinking. That to me has been Dhoni's biggest attribute on display - his calm "tension nahin lene ka" demeanor.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

You have a point. :D

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

The way he finished his top bowlers overs in the game against Aus was a stroke of genius . The brave move to give the ball to ur best bowler got paid off and Sree took the ''most important '' wicket which was obviously the turning point of the match .

Most importantly that ''coolness'' was just awesome . He was the best captain of the tournament and rightly won the ultimate prize . He deserved that .

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

while the media is over the top, i dont dhoni is...

He said himself along the lines of that its not really his decisions that won the game, its the peformance of the players. if couple of decisions didnt go our way, i would not be in this situation now and reaction would be different....

shows he has good understanding and cool head
at the reception where the politicians took over (including one guy who spoke completely out of context in marathi), dhoni said ok enough of talking in english and marathi, lets talk in hindi :)

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Sorry but I think the Indian media is just going overboard over this TT win and rambling too much. Yes by all means celebrate your triumph but please don't turn Dhoni into some kind of a God (heaping praise on him like there has never been a captain like him before!) or take this victory to mean that India are now somehow undisputed kings of TT.

The TT victory simply means that India were slightly the better team on the day, nothing more nothing less.

And the same disease afflicts the English media who go all gaga after every small win and waste no time in overhyping their players. The hype and euphoria that followed the Ashes victory in 2005 was just beyond belief and disgusting. The tabloids here were running headlines like "now England can rule cricket for the next ten years"......excuse me. Thankfully it was n't long before England were put in their rightful place by Pakistan who humbled them 2-0 in tests. The tour was a reality check for them.

The Indian media, players and fans need to keep their feet on the ground because it could be a very different result against Australia in the ODIs.

And coming back to the article, Dhoni's choices were limited and it could so easily have ended in tears for India. Sharma is just a mediocre bowler. He did n't get Misbah out rather the latter got out himself while trying to play an overambitious flick. 9 times out of 10 Misbah would have succeeded in hitting a boundary but it was n't to be on that day. I doubt it very much that Dhoni would have tossed the ball to Sharma if Pakistan needed just 5 or 6 runs with more than one wicket in hand. 13 runs may not seem very much but you have to bowl terribly to concede that many runs in a pressure over. What if the gamble had not paid off and Pakistan had won? Would these so-called cricket commentators and pundits still be saying the same things. They I am sure would be calling for Dhoni's head by now had India lost. This kind of over-emotional and exaggerated non-sense is what degrades journalism.

I would take this article with a pinch of salt if I were you......

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Lol... Am quite sure all of you would have been singing a different song had Pakistan won the cup.
Even if there were any wrongs that Dhoni did, they more or less seem like positives now since India has won.
So stop cribbing, Let the media go berserk, Think they're making up for all the banter they gave this team when they were shot out of the World Cup earlier. Equilibrium, you see.
And well then, Winner takes all isn't it?
As SRK said: You never win the silver, you always lose the gold.

Three cheers & a Champagne!!!!!!

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Yes...and the people bursting crackers in Ranchi in celebration would be stoning Dhoni's house instead.

Dhoni & Co should not forget that these same fans lining the streets of Mumbai (to hail TEAM INDIA) are also capable of burning effigies and garlanding their pictures with chappals.

One big reason why India performed superbly in T20 WC is that there was no pre-tournament media-created hype in India, no big expectation of the public from the team...hence no real pressure on the players......unfortunately that will not always be the case.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

I think , Jogindar (useless fellow) played in the team bcos dhoni did not wanted agarkar( another completely useless fellow) but when you compare them jogindar imerges a winner. This selection shows some courages and also he was extremely composed in tense moments.

Jogindar bowling against aus can be a understandable move but against pakistan in finals was no stroke of genius but it was a sucidal move. They say luck favors brave but i think misbah's sucidal shot selection/execution brought luck to india and dhoni.

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

I don't think the 20/20 format is the right format to assess how Dhoni is as a captain. Nonetheless i still believe Yuvi should be captain

Re: Top Performer: Mahendra Singh Dhoni

Yaar you missed the point. Noone is taking anything away from India's triumph in TT. Well done to you guys. Yes celebrate. It's your right to do so. Just don't go over the top.

I was one of the first people to congratulate Indian guppies on this forum. I said then that India deserved to win not necessarily because of their perfomance in the final but because of their quite sensational performance with the bat and ball against Australia and South Africa respectively.

No one one knows for sure how TT will pan out over the next few years and whether India will be able to consistently beat sides in TT until the next edition. I believe that Australia will slowly but surely master this format and become the most successful side in TT. Even now if Pakistan and India were to play 10 games against them, Australia would probably win 7 or 8 of those games.

Mind you the only two teams who won the World Cup and were also the best team around at the time were

West Indies (1975 and 1979) and

Australia (1999, 2003 & 2007)