Re: Tolerating the wrong ..
So, do we have to wait until someone is harmed to recognize that something is an overall danger to society? Or is there like a quota…where x number of people must be screwed or hurt by alcohol for it to be considered a danger? I used danger instead of immoral; an attempt at tolerance. 
So, is drunk driving the only potential ill consequence of drinking? How about rapes? Assault/violence? Damage to property? You sure it’s only a problem when you’re behind the wheel? That it’s the only form of harm? Seriously?