Today's News Quiz - It's Quiz time !!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/20/opinion/20FRIE.html

Today’s News Quiz

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

New Delhi,
So, class, time for a news quiz: Name the second-largest Muslim community in the world. Iran? Wrong. Pakistan? Wrong. Saudi Arabia? Wrong. Time’s up ? you lose.

Answer: India. That’s right: India, with nearly 150 million Muslims, is believed to have more Muslim citizens than Pakistan or Bangladesh, and is second only to Indonesia. Which brings up another question that I’ve been asking here in New Delhi: Why is it you don’t hear about Indian Muslims who are a minority in this vast Hindu-dominated land ? blaming America for all their problems or wanting to fly suicide planes into the Indian Parliament?

Answer: Multi-ethnic, pluralistic, free-market democracy. To be sure, Indian Muslims have their frustrations, and have squared off over the years in violent clashes with Hindus, as has every other minority in India. But they live in a noisy, messy democracy, where opportunities and a political voice are open to them, and that makes a huge difference.

"I’ll give you a quiz question: Which is the only large Muslim community to enjoy sustained democracy for the last 50 years? The Muslims of India,"remarked M.J.Akbar, the Muslim editor of Asian Age, a national Indian English-language daily

funded by non-Muslim Indians. “I am not going to exaggerate Muslim good fortune in India. There are tensions, economic discrimination and provocations, like the destruction of the mosque at Ayodhya. But the fact is, the Indian Constitution is secular and provides a real opportunity for the economic advancement of any community that can offer talent. That’s why a growing Muslim middle class here is moving up and, generally, doesn’t manifest the strands of deep anger you find in many non-democratic Muslim states.”

In other words, for all the talk about Islam and Islamic rage, the real issue is: Islam in what context? Where Islam is imbedded in authoritarian societies it tends to become the vehicle of angry protest, because religion and the mosque are the only places people can organize against autocratic leaders. And when those leaders are seen as being propped up by America, America also becomes the target of Muslim rage.

But where Islam is imbedded in a pluralistic,democratic society, it thrives like any other religion. Two of India’s presidents have been Muslims; a Muslim woman sits on India’s supreme court. The architect of India’s missile program, A. P.J.Abdul Kalam, is a Muslim. Indian Muslims, including women, have been governors of many Indian states, and the wealthiest man in India, the info-tech whiz Azim Premji, is a Muslim. The other day the Indian Muslim film star and parliamentarian Shabana Azmi lashed out at the imam of New Delhi’s biggest mosque. She criticized him for putting Islam in a bad light and suggested he go join the Taliban in Kandahar. In a democracy, liberal Muslims, particularly women, are not afraid to take on rigid mullahs.

Followed Bangladesh lately? It has almost as many Muslims as Pakistan. Over the last 10 years, though, without the world noticing, Bangladesh has had three democratic transfers of power, in two of which, are you ready, Muslim women were elected prime ministers. Result: All the economic and social indicators in Bangladesh have been pointing upward lately, and Bangladeshis are not preoccupied hating America. Meanwhile in Pakistan, trapped in the circle of bin Ladenism, military dictatorship, poverty and anti-modernist Islamic schools, all reinforcing each other, the social indicators are all pointing down and hostility to America is rife.

Hello? Hello? There’s a message here: It’s democracy, stupid! Those who argue that we needn’t press for democracy in Arab-Muslim states, and can rely on repressive regimes, have it all wrong. If we cut off every other avenue for non-revolutionary social change, pressure for change will burst out anyway, as Muslim rage and anti-Americanism.

If America wants to break the bin Laden circles across the Arab-Muslim world, then, “it needs to find role models that are succeeding as pluralistic, democratic, modernizing societies, like India which is constantly being challenged by religious extremists of all hues and support them,” argues Raja Mohan, strategic affairs editor of The Hindu newspaper.

So true. For Muslim societies to achieve their full potential today, democracy may not be sufficient, but it sure is necessary. And we, and they, fool ourselves to think otherwise.

checking his calendar... when's the next riot?

America’s discovery of India

From L K Sharma
DH News Service
Washington, Nov 20

It was a discovery of India for millions of New York Times readers when they were informed that India is the home of the world's second-largest Muslim community. This best kept secret today became news "fit to print".
The visiting writer, Thomas L Friedman, used the New Delhi dateline to put the information in a news quiz format and rightly presumed that most of his readers might have given that status to Iran or Saudi Arabia.
He informed them that more Muslims live in India than in Pakistan or Bangladesh.
Had this fact been known to President George Bush just the previous evening, he would not have failed to invite the Indian envoy to the first-ever Iftar party held in the White House.
In the wonderland of India, the New York Times writer went about asking why Indian Muslims do not blame America for all their problems or want to fly suicide planes into the Indian Parliament? He found the answer: "Multi-ethnic, pluralistic, free-market democracy."
Of course, having given the western values their due credit, the American visitor is unlikely to stay on to visit the shrines that both Hindus and Muslims go to or to study the residual impact of civilisational values and the inter-mingling of faith communities. He will have no time to study Sufism or Hinduism which accords a place to the non-believer. With fires burning in Kandhar and New York, he will have no time to study Indian history or to live in an Indian village to see how friends and neighbours live peacefully saying: "You do your things, I do mine; our objective is the same, but we take different paths".
Having failed to inform his readers in the earlier decades that India has had two Muslim Presidents, the writer makes up by noting that India even has a Muslim editor of an English-language daily! He goes on to list the Muslim woman justice of the Supreme court and other dignitaries such as A P J Abdul Kalam, Azim Premji and Shabana Azmi. Bit surprised that Muslim women are not afraid to take on rigid mullahs.
The New York Times report just sums up India's failure since its independence to inform the world what India is about. But for the recent promotion of India in the White House list, the US media would not have taken this much interest. India earlier got a bad press because it was seen as friendly to the Soviet Union and the western media took the cue from the American media.
In the west, the description of other cultures and people must have an element of humour. The Arabs need not feel offended by the description of their headgear by a noted American politician as "diaper tied with a fan belt." "Diaper" was what Mahatma Gandhi used to wear in the eyes of many Americans even though they were sympathetic to India wanting to be free from their own former colonial masters.
Composite culture and multi-cultural harmony in the developing world is not a newsy topic. Decades of inter-religious harmony in the Balkans never got projected but strife did. Western media organisations generally believe that their audiences can understand other faiths only if these are represented by those who look funny and say outrageous things.
This has currently become a topic of discussion in Britain as the TV channels hunt down and bring to their studios Islamists of extreme persuasion. The channel personnel try to ascertain how extreme the person's views are before inviting him or her to appear on the talk shows which have no use for the moderates.
A Trishul-waving Hindu or a gun-wielding bearded Muslim makes a better picture. During the Ayodhya tragedy, the TV channels in Britain tried to find the most ignorant Hindu who could make a fool of himself during the discussions.
Now that the link between democracy and Indian Muslims has been discovered, it is possible that Washington may rethink its policy towards Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and some other allies.
It may realise that its old friend Gen Zia-ul Haq had known it all along that democracy was against true Muslim faith. That was why he never took any chances with democracy. He also knew that Muslims of Pakistan and India also shared the common culture and traditions and that was why he was quick to orient his countrymen towards Saudi Arabia so that they could be distanced from a South Asian Islam.
Washington, now aware of foreign influences on domestic Islam, may also realise that Islam as practiced in Jammu and Kashmir would have never permitted terrorism.