TO VIEW A THINKING ANIMAL

[IntelliPhant]

deliberate complexes are bad thing to possess. it is alright to be cautious and always aiming to improve one's life, but not get hung up on things that are more or less fixed. what is the value of transition that is begot with a sense of burden some lethargy? why can people not see that the process of effort led with clear intentions and by embraching change as well as adapt to change willingly is far better than to crib all along the way?

Without knowing the context, the contents of your post seem way in congruent with the subject but nevertheless conspicuous, so here is what I have to say about this.

<!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal/w:View 0/w:Zoom false/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid false/w:IgnoreMixedContent false/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText /w:Compatibility MicrosoftInternetExplorer4/w:BrowserLevel /w:WordDocument <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]> /w:LatentStyles <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <![endif]--> No one is in any sort of complex by choice even those who would jealously protect their attitude of complex are either unaware or unconscious about it. Possession of complex is a depiction of an attitude rather than a personality and it’s never deliberate. Unless bent upon self destruction an average human being will always strive to improve upon the conditions around him or move to conditions better within his definition of “better”, those who are suicidal , to me, are extreme cases of negative extrovert behavior believing that their non existence is a sacrifice for the betterment of other. It’s an act of benevolent self destruction.

We are all born with an induced knowledge called “nature”, same for every human being, then we start adding colors to that nature, different races, different ethnicity , different culture add different colors to our “nature”, as an adult what we display is a mutated nature of generation upon generation; age plays its role in the formulation of our analysis, we look through the eyes, yet the image on the back of the brain is filtered through the “wisdom” of the age in which we live, for that reason a speeding biker appears to be an inspiration for a teen age and an attempt to suicide for an aged. Getting “hung up” to fixed things can either be a personality trait or an age factor but nevertheless it is a desire for stability yet seen as “anti change” more or less always.

The value of a transition with the sense of burden has its value in the nature of the transition and the intention with which the transition has been seen, accepted or acted upon, it’s hard to generalize but it should not be considered as subaltern.