Cost of doing business in Punjab is highest in Pakistan.. just naive like you would rant like this..
Yours truly.. your Imam.. Mr. IK has been selling his choran to the public.. hum sub truck ki butti kay pechay lagay hain.. aur the whole nation is devoid of a consensus because of him>> and he changes his stance every 15 minutes../QUOTE]
Clearly you are not a fan of speaking the truth and stating most obvious and simple fact. So are you telling us in the last APC meeting, all parties (including PTI's arch rivals such as MQM, ANP, PPP etc) agreed to hold Peace Talks because Imran? I wonder why?
While you are at it, tell us how Imran changes his stance every 15 minutes? He's been saying the same old thing for past 13 years.
The same Taliban who’ve killed hundreds of thousands of Pakistanis because they thought there were ‘kafir’. Of course they have the moral authority, their words, verdict and wishes means a world means a world to some of their oh so obvious opposers.
The same Taliban who've killed hundreds of thousands of Pakistanis because they thought there were 'kafir'. Of course** they have the moral authority, their words, verdict and wishes means a world means** a world to some of their oh so obvious opposers.
better tell this to your leader. maybe he shut up himself from speaking again.
@yazdi: how can punjab have higher costs for doing business if it is the place to be in Pakistan unless there is corruption involved? You have said that law & order is great, though you have to accept the fact that it is because ttp and co. aren't actively targeting punjab. After all, it was the same SS under whose reign Sri Lankan team was attacked (btw what happened to getting the attackers? say good bye to cricket because of that) and ghq and data darbar attacks among many others.
You can only set up some mobile companies as otherwise, you would need karachi and perhaps a linked gawadar to sell your exports so yeah, too bad you are still in a bind. Looking to the future, even if punjab and rest of Pakistan gets the message for population control, punjab would need to 'off load' its population to balochistan as karachi is already reaching its limits with pashtuns displaced from KP showing up. Karachi would have to expand much further into balochistan and sindh to accommodate more people from in-country. Have an unstable Pakistan and your precious punjab would just explode like a cheap do numbri pressure cooker.
better tell this to your leader. maybe he shut up himself from speaking again.
As long as Pakistan is a democracy, he has every right to speak. It's the fascists and Taliban that need to shut up and learn to the grasp the idea of freedom of speech and thought.
@yazdi: how can punjab have higher costs for doing business if it is the place to be in Pakistan unless there is corruption involved? You have said that law & order is great, though you have to accept the fact that it is because ttp and co. aren't actively targeting punjab. After all, it was the same SS under whose reign Sri Lankan team was attacked (btw what happened to getting the attackers? say good bye to cricket because of that) and ghq and data darbar attacks among many others.
You can only set up some mobile companies as otherwise, you would need karachi and perhaps a linked gawadar to sell your exports so yeah, too bad you are still in a bind. Looking to the future, even if punjab and rest of Pakistan gets the message for population control, punjab would need to 'off load' its population to balochistan as karachi is already reaching its limits with pashtuns displaced from KP showing up. Karachi would have to expand much further into balochistan and sindh to accommodate more people from in-country. Have an unstable Pakistan and your precious punjab would just explode like a cheap do numbri pressure cooker.
As long as Pakistan is a democracy, he has every right to speak. It's the fascists and Taliban that need to shut up and learn the grasp the idea of freedom of speech and thought.
remind me of malala book episode. freedom of speech doesn't applicable on the lovers of terror.
fancy pants IK must leave the country until the operation comes to its logical conclusion. then he can have his tsunami loz.
remind me of malala book episode. freedom of speech doesn't applicable on the lovers of terror.
fancy pants IK must leave the country until the operation comes to its logical conclusion. then he can have his tsunami loz.
It takes some guts to come on TV and say yes it was a huge blunder, I condemn my party for doing this.
He might, if the the army has the come guts come out and declare an operation. We'll see when there's an operation.
Now I know what your next stock response is: IK is also an undercover COAS, Sharif with moustache is actually a slave of IK while he carries out all his meetings with Sharif without moustache on weekly basis. It was his master IK who told him to run off to Saudi Arabia while the Peace Talks take place.
It takes some guts to come on TV and say yes it was a huge blunder, I condemn my party for doing this.
he didn't say it on tv, it was on twitter then after the backlash he come to his senses. funny leader.
[QUOTE]
He might, if the the army has the come guts come out and declare an operation. We'll see when there's an operation.
[/QUOTE]
your head still under the sand, the airforce is pounding them from early morning.
[QUOTE]
Now I know what your next stock response is: IK is also an undercover COAS, Sharif with moustache is actually a slave of IK while he carries out all his meetings with Sharif without moustache on weekly basis. It was his master IK who told him to run off to Saudi Arabia while the Peace Talks take place.
[/QUOTE]
none of it, I just think he is an idiot who have no idea what comes out from his mouth.
remind me of malala book episode. freedom of speech doesn't applicable on the lovers of terror.
Let's be fair. How many times you see a political party conceding that it erred in something? Please quote a few example for my general knowledge.
It's absolutely fine if you dislike PTI for any reason. But does it mean you should also refrain from appreciating a good deed just because you are politically against it?