TIME 100 & Musharraf

This week TIME Magazine published its ‘100 Most Influential’ list for 2006. James Kelly the Managing Editor says;

*“…I’m pleased to say that I think this is our most intriguing list yet. It is also our largest issue since we named Albert Einstein our Person of the Century six years ago, an appropriate milestone since this week’s double issue has its roots in our series naming the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.”

*http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1189160,00.html

The List includes, in the ‘Leaders and Revolutionaries’ category, our very own President General Pervez Musharraf!

Daniel Benjamin coauthor of ‘The Next Attack: The Failure of the War on Terror and a Strategy for Getting it Right’ writes:

“In an era superrich in nightmare scenarios, nothing disturbs the sleep of world leaders more than the prospect of chaos in Pakistan—and jihadists’ gaining control over its nuclear weapons. Standing between order and that cataclysm, those leaders believe, is General Pervez Musharraf, the country’s leader since 1999. On Sept. 12, 2001, Musharraf made a snap decision to side with the U.S. in the not-yet-named global war on terrorism, despite his country’s longtime support for the Taliban. U.S.-Pakistani cooperation has since led to the arrest of al-Qaeda kingpins and a diminution of the threat from Osama bin Laden’s group. Called “my buddy” by George W. Bush, Musharraf, 62, has paid a price for his decision, having been the target of multiple assassination attempts by the militants who infest his country. His ties with the U.S. enrage religious radicals, who are his most dangerous opponents. ** Musharraf styles himself a blunt-talking soldier. Yet his rule has a circus quality—half high-wire act, half tiger riding. He has yet to confront the broader jihadist movement, and he has two local rebellions to deal with. Musharraf remains the West’s best bet in Pakistan. The question is whether he is good enough.”

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1187204,00.html

The 100 List this year also includes Mukhtaran Mai in the ‘Heroes & Pioneers’ category.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

^^ Times and other news media (especially the ones that are left of center) fail to understand Pakistani society. Pakistani society is split mainly in two groups:

  1. The most vocal news media group and Mullah group all carry anti-West pro-show-shaw-lism (socialism) philosophy.

  2. Military and bureaucrats that are strongly pro-West as long West guarantees support for Pakistan and pays attention to Pakistani fears.

West will always have Pakistani support as long as West doesn't put Pakistan down and raise Bharatis to much against Pakistan.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Musharraf is a decisive leader and that is why people have variety of opinions about him. He is indeed in a tight spot and may Allah protect him from any danger. I support him but, there have been numerous occasions where he failed to make a solid contribution. I mean his vision of 'Enlightened Moderation' is very admirable but at the same time when Mukhtar Mai was raped the only thing he could come up with was Canada. His position is concrete and the slient majority endorse him. He should take advantage of it and bring major reforms nationally, especially when it comes to women rights. Speaking about it only is not going to work.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

I like Mushharaf but you see he thinks he is indespensible and its such a turn off when a leader of his stature fails to learn any lesson from history. What on earth makes him think (most probably his toadies) his being in uniform is best for the country. There is growing disaffection in 'many' quarters due to his inability to realize, that its about time he steps down.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Hey Minerva! Great to have you back! :)
How's all going?

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

I agree that his biggest mistake is not having made 'proper' succession arrangements that'll be best suited for Pakistan.
At the moment his absence even for an hour would mean total chaos and whatever frail system of govt we have now no matter how useful it may be, will stumble and the old players will start beating their chests again.
Given all this, his biggest dilemma ought to be to try making longterm arrangements.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

After 5 fooking years, they still question if he is good enough? There are some things in his control and some not in his control. What do they expect him to do, take off that khaki and bend over?

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Haris that is a mighty stretch of imagination. Let's not bring Pakistan down to the jannat of Gen. Farah Aideed. Please!

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Mush has made a long term arrangement. His successor is - drumroll please - Pervez Musharraf!

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Hey Haris, am great!!
How are you?

you still around, eh?

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Good for President Musharraf. :k:

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

True!

:k:

Musharraf should give up his uniform and become ‘fully civilian’ if he wants the continued support of his followers. As soon as possible… It’s good for him; it’s good for the country. In the absence of strong democratic institutions/parties and incorruptible politicians capable of leading the nation, we should also be worried about who is going to succeed him. We desperately need charismatic leaders from our political class. Pakistan armed forces can play a positive role without entering the strictly political arena of the country.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Yes idealistically a civilian musharraf may be appealing, but realistically speaking, without the uniform and his general's baton he's simply going to be naked and defenseless-which means he has no political status outside the uniform, and would have no control without his baton which drives the Pakistan military behind him. So no uniform-no role, no baton-no power (to control or to influence anyone or anything at all).

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Haris, I agree. But military can not stay in power indefinitely. They have to let politicians take over at some point. It's in the interest of military itself. Good for country; good for people; good for military. Military maybe more tolerant and progressive than politicnas in many ways, but staying in the political arena of the country for too long harms their own interests. Musharraf may have the opportunity this year or next year to discard his uniform and become a civilian president for the next five years. It will be like a smooth and willing transition to complete civilian rule. Military has NSC to voice their opinion now. Karamat was sacked by Sharif for demanding NSC, because the latter didn't want military to challenge his ambitions to become 'Ameer-ul-Momineen' of Pakistan.

Now, when we have this institution in place, military can gradually loosen its grip on political power and let politicians take over. I'm confident that we'd be able to see the rise of some capable and charismatic leaders from political class in the next five years. And I can only pray that these politicans will not become intolerant and retrogressive like they have been in the past.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

A popular leader doesn't rely on a stick to rule..reformers like Attaturk and Nasser quit the Army after assuming power, those like Suharto who stayed in power eventually fell from it because the army generals went into business and made themselves incredibly rich.

The whole civilians thing is only partially true most of the PML leaders Mush has around him will immediately start approaching the next Army chief to oust Mush and give them better jobs. The reality is If one looks at it Mush has only to be worried about his own ..Iskandier Mirza appointed Ayub Khan out of turn because of supposed loyalty..Ayub stabbed him in the back then Ayub appointed Yahya and he stabbed him in the back ..then army officers turned on yahya after east pakistan and stabbe dhim in the back ..Bhutto appointed Zia over the head of other army guys and he stabbed him in the back..much the same happened with zia and Nawaz sharif..so why would Mush quit when his main worry is his own army?

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

True. But unfortunately Musharraf hasnt been able to walk that path.They were strict reformers and brought about big changes. Musharraf's biggest mistake of his life, which is sinking his ship, has been his not being a strict reformer. He gathered the crooks to form his political army. The same crooks could topple him. Had he surrounded himself only with the most sincere and straight people willing to work with him he would have been in a diff situation. But the way things are, it seems he didnt allow himself to become a poplular peoples leader. That he could have done through punishing the criminals, briging about a real revolution, winning the people's support. But he didnt, and the whole system still remains in the clutches of the professional politicians ala sardars, nawabs, chaudrys and exilees.

Exactly Zakk.

The system is still sick, people are still powerless and dont count. Thanks to the 'power to the politicians' ideology instead of 'power to the people';the biggest actual power lying dorment that everyone should try to win but no one does.

Mush now has no bail out option. He bails out, the aircraft crashes. So what we're left with is letting him fly as long as he could and hope for the best. A mircale might heal the ailing system, or we'll face the same problems again when he's out, whenever that is. Pakistanis silently accept that. It's unnerving.

Re: TIME 100 & Musharraf

Pakistani politicians, and charters or not charters politicians will always look to the army for backing and support. They should follow what Turkey did in the early 1980’s i.e. accept a formal and institutional role for the armed forces, and then work within this system to change it over a long period. That allows the building of trust between both sides, development of a true politcal culture devoid of personalities, and the gradual withdrawal of the army from political life entirely. Not too long ago PPP stalwart Ghulam Mustafa Khar suggested that such a deal be struck between the army and politicians for at least 10 years. Interestingly at the same time Benazir was signing the charter with Nawaz, she sidelined the PPP Punjab leaders and has given Khar a central role in decision-making.

http://www.fact.com.pk/archives/jan/feng/khr.htm