Why was my thread closed without reason? Just because personal sensitivities could not bear properly comprehending what I meant?
The thread was misunderstood as a call to bomb Pakistan. Instead, it was a thread calling our attention to the special and preferential treatment Pakistan gets from the USA.
We house terrorists. We have wmds. We have a tyrant. Why then did the USA bomb Iraq and Afghanistan - and not Pakistan?
Please re-open the thread so some of us can carry on discussing why Pakistan has been left alone. There was a much broader discussion happening in that thread. A discussion missed by a few members and one particular moderator (X2).
I will give you the same response that was sent to you in the PM
choice is yours.
*well either you are back tracking, or you are an incredibly poor writer. why was the thread misunderstiood by so many people.
whether what you wrote was wrong or whether how you wrote it was wrong, the end result is that majority of people are reading it as justifications for attack on Pakistan.
You can appeal my decision. or you can agree to rewrite your post, send the text to me, I will edit your initial post, put that text in there, and reopen the thread.
As it stands the thread is not going to be reopened.*
I never said I wanted Pakistan to be attacked. All I said was, according to the USA's pretense to enter Iraq/Afghanistan, that Pakistan SHOULD be attacked (for the four reasons). It's called logical deduction. I clarified in my posts several times that it was a thought experiment. You can look through my post and count how many times i reiterated that.
If Iraq does 123 and has xyz attack it. Why does Pakistan get away with doing 123 and not get attacked by xyz. Obviously the two should be treated the same. Right? If Iraq was attacked under false pretenses why is Pakistan not being attacked under proper pretenses?
That was the premise of my thread - asking WHY. Why has pakistan been ignored from the "axis of evil"? If you cant answer that question yourself, please reopen that thread so level headed members can figure it out.
This is what you have posted in your thread as your opening post:
Iraq failed. They had no nuclear weapons. They had no connection to Al Qaeda. They had no connection with Taliban. It seems the US miscalculated their threat.
What they needed to do... was bomb the heck out of Pakistan:
Al Qaeda calls Pakistan home (terrorist hotbed)
Pakistan has nuclear weapons (weapons of mass destruction)
ISI has always supported the Taliban (state sponsored terrorism)
Dictator Musharraf has killed thousands of his own people (tyrannical ruler)
If you're serious about combating terrorism, lets start by bombing Pakistan.
Read it again and see how it reads, not only will the thread stay closed it is being moved as well.
I never said I wanted Pakistan to be attacked. All I said was,** according to the USA's pretense to enter Iraq/Afghanistan, that Pakistan SHOULD be attacked (for the four reasons)**. It's called logical deduction. I clarified in my posts several times that it was a thought experiment. You can look through my post and count how many times i reiterated that.
Reason one pakistan can't defend them self againest us(USA)/or can't attack back at USA
Reason two pakistan can't defend them self againest us(USA)or can't attack back at USA
Reason three pakistan can't defend them self againest us(USA)or can't attack back at USA
Reason four pakistan can't defend them self againest us(USA)/or can't attack back at USA
^ Exactly. That in essence is what I meant. We should be attacked...but they hesitate. We're a lot worse than Iraq/Afghanistan. The irony though, is that because we are a real threat - we'll likely never be attacked.
If anyone sees any worth in the mentioned thread - go right ahead and edit whatever is needed to re-open it. Otherwise I'll insert my anti-Pakistan mumbo jumbo elsewhere.