This is the sort of technology we need

Apparently Indian cricket team is also going the high-tech way on their path to revival. This is exactly the sort of information which Aussies and Afrikaans are using for a long time now. Maybe what Pakistan need is not another super-fast bowler, but an Intel-powered lap-top.

From Times of India

Team India turns laptop warriors

Every time a New Zealand wicket falls and a new batsmen comes out in their game against India on Friday, the Indians will know exactly what kind of ball he relishes and what makes him uncomfortable; how many runs he has scored in a particular region of a particular kind of ball; and what kind of delivery he has gotten out to most. In short, they will know exactly where to bowl to him.

That is what they mostly discuss in the huddle they get into each time they claim a wicket. They know this not from long-term memory, but from near-term homework done only the previous evening at a strategy session where they have studied every single relevant ball bowled to the New Zealanders in recent times including in the World Cup.

They know their ‘Uncomfortables’ – a new word that has been introduced to the cricketing lexicon.

At the heart of the Indian cricket team’s performance in the World Cup, and their general cricketing revival, is the use of technology, appropriately enough for a country that is beginning to boast of being masters of the genre.

For several months now, the Indians have been using off-the-field hardware and software aimed at sharpening their on-field cricketing acumen and skills, and the results are beginning to show.

The software tool they use is called e-CricketPro, and tagged to the team is computer jock Shriram Bhargav, on loan from the Bangalore-based Phoenix Global Solutions which engineered the whole idea with advice from veteran Javagal Srinath.

Bhargav, a network engineer whose passion for the game sees him even bowl at the nets, records each game on a ACI Extreme laptop with humongous memory (one gig) and hard drive (80 gig).

While doing so, he provides attributes to each ball, describing its length, direction, pace and what the batsman did with it, defended, pushed, drove, edged, missed etc. At the end of the day, or at any given time, the team can call on Bhargava and ask for specific data capture, query, and report generation.

For instance, Srinath could call for a file of all his slower balls to see how it is working. Ashish Nehra could call for all his bouncers bowled just against New Zealand batsmen in the recent concluded to see how each of them handled it, or just the way he bowled to Fleming.

Ganguly could ask for all his ‘uncomfortables’ to see what he is doing wrong. Even trainer Andrew Leipus is known to call for data to see how the boys are throwing in from the deep.

Bhargava can put the answer to every individual query on to a CD-ROM and give it to the player, who can watch it in the privacy of his room (each Indian team member now carries a personal laptop).

Or he can answer broad team queries at the strategy session the team has on the evening before the game – like for instance watching Shane Bond take all his wickets against India in NZ; or the ‘uncomfortables’ they encountered.

All the major international cricket teams use technology now, but what sets apart the Indian software, says Bhargav, is its speed and wider attributes. Bhargav uses a small, powerful laptop and a larger customized note-book in an aluminum box (that looks like a nuclear football) to power the Indian team.

In a demo for this correspondent at “Jacaranda” – the Indian team’s strategy room at Sandton Sun Hotel in Johannesburg, the cheerful computer geek ran through the program’s remarkable capabilities, throwing up immediate and explicit answers to the most minute queries (say Tendulkar’s straight drives, Ganguly’s dismissals, Bond’s yorkers). Jayasuriya’s off-side play? No problem. Tendulkar’s paddle sweeps? Sure.

The software can spit out wagon wheels and pie charts in a jiffy, offering everything from field setting for Jayasuriya on the basis of his strengths to Vaas’ dismissals against India. The tool can help motivate individual players and also help the team strategise.

“It’s a terrific concept has really helped the team and it’s getting better all the time,” says team vice-captain Rahul Dravid, who calls on the tool to fine-tune his batting. During the tour of West Indies, Dravid felt he was closing up his stance and called for his previous batting files to correct it.

The tool helps spot even minute changes which make a big difference in outcome, he says. The big advantage is it compresses the time it takes to watch a whole video to just the relevant shots, besides offering the advantages of split screen etc for comparison.

match say pehlay hamari team aisay homework kyon nahi karti :bummer:

aur agar karti hai to whr are the results :mad3:

this technology sounds interesting :k:

PCB should be lookin fwd to get it. :slight_smile:

Sounds pretty neat but I have a question, whenever a batsman is dissmised and the new batsman comes to the crease, how would Ganguly or any other captain find out which deliveries to bowl to the new batsman, I mean do they have 12th man from India come out and tell the captain what to do or they just have to memorize each player's weakness.

I think they discuss it previous evening and they just remeber important points and then refresh when the huddle together.

:k:

Well done boys in blue. :slight_smile:

Yeah this is great. But even kangaroos do it!

Re: This is the sort of technology we need

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
...............
The software tool they use is called e-CricketPro, and tagged to the team is computer jock Shriram Bhargav, on loan from the Bangalore-based Phoenix Global Solutions which engineered the whole idea with advice from veteran Javagal Srinath...................... [/list]
[/QUOTE]

for those who dont know srinath is a computer engineer ...........

Re: Re: This is the sort of technology we need

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by maihu_don: *

for those who dont know srinath is a computer engineer ...........
[/QUOTE]

And so is Kumble.

Any sort of planning is better be it on laptop or mental. I remember 92 world cup final when Miandad told afterwards that he had planned to stop the wickets after early dismisals as they knew there would be plenty of chances to make good score at the end.

In this world cup, when Wasim Akram was asked before match against England, which player will you be targetting and he said no one in particular but jokingly said Flintoff's wicket would be a good one since he was his county-buddy. One can argue that he was trying to show that he is quite confident but it felt like if he didn't care.

Interesting article. Congratulations to the Indians for being prepared to move with the times but it's not something that we haven't tried to implement. Richard Pybus claimed he was trying to introdue these methods as well but a lot of players weren't prepared to learn and refused to listen.

Well, now Miandad is going to be the new coach, which will make a lot of people happy here because he's not a 'farangi' and he can speak urdu to the over-sensitive players. I wonder if he'll be carrying a laptop? Somehow I doubt it.

I thought Siknader Bakht was doing exactly the same thing during this world cup for Pakistan.

ehsan, if Sikhander Bakht was doing the same thing then I don't really understand the thinking behind using Afridi as an opener against the top seam attacks and dropping him against the weak ones. If that's effective game-planning based on computerised and scientific strategy then Inzimam must be a NASA technician in his spare time.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Mr Xtreme: *
if Sikhander Bakht was doing the same thing then I don't really understand the thinking behind using Afridi as an opener against the top seam attacks and dropping him against the weak ones. ...
[/QUOTE]

computers don't make decision so it again comes down to good coach and captain. :)

I agree with Khan. These techniques have been in place for a decade now. The analysis help you make a decision. The ultimate decision-making is still left to the individual himself.

From the above article:

**They know this not from long-term memory, but from near-term homework done only the previous evening at a strategy session where they have studied every single relevant ball bowled to the New Zealanders in recent times including in the World Cup. **

Now Sikhander Bakht might have a computer, but what’s the point if you are going to come up with decisions like bat Afridi as opener against the Aussies and drop him against Namibia and Holland? I think 90% of GS members could tell you that was suicide without any computers.

I’d really be interested to hear how our computer technology and scientific strategy came up with a gameplan like that :hehe:

Ah yes, the computer had a virus and mistook Afridi for Richard. :hehe:

Well, when a team is doing good, everything they do seems good and perfect. But using technology does help at times. Ehsan bhai, we need professionals with analytical skills to make good use of the equipment, With all due respect to Mr. Bakht and his cricketing skills, I dont think he could have used the computer effectively.

I was only sayig that he was recording something out there, whether he was effective or whether he was just data collecting I havent got a clue.

Looking at this seriously, You have to say that If both teams are implementing these new strategies, it's only with the Indians that it seems to have had any effect. Obviously form plays a part, but no one could look at Pakistan's matches and say that there looked to be any gameplan played according to the opposition. If there was I'd love to see somebody take responsibilty and explain it.

This things can help, but at the end of the day you need to go and perform on the field - and for that there is only talent, practice, and fitness. And also some luck.

No he was watching Porn on internet instead of making plans.