there is no place for kashmiri pandits

Re: there is no place for kashmiri pandits

So, what is your proposal? For one side to lay down arms in hopes the other does as well? And which side do you suppose should do so first, considering that one side doesn’t believe the other namely Indians.Who is going to initiate the peace between the sides? At what cost in terms of future violence, knowing full well how Indian dictatorship in the region have historically treated ceasefires with freedom fighters in Kashmir? What makes you think that peace is possible with you one side only? What makes you think that Pakistan alone should stop hostilities? What about the Indian army who swept into the valley to occupy Kashmir which initiated this war? What about fundamental hatred for the Kashmiris who historically do not want to rule by your country?

Why should Pakistan leave Kashmiris after 60+ years of conflict to leave and make it an open target for Indian dictatorship? You keep saying it is Pakistan that messed up, but as Kant said, an “ought” implies a “can”, and neither (Pakistanis and Kashmiris) can comply with your utopian, naive nonsense.
“Collateral damage” is tragic and undesirable, yes, but so is the one sided point of view you’re advocating here about Pakistan being messed in Kashmir. Now if your indian government would have been true angels, there would have been no Indian soldiers there in Kashmir and confidence building measure with Kashmiris would have taken place. Which I believe it is done by winning the hearts and minds of the people. How? By showing people of Kashmir how peace should be done by showing action. By not throwing bullets at Kashmiris when Indian army themesleves live in a “glass house” in the valley.