There is no compulsion in religion

Sharia is from Quran and sunnah.

Yes we the champions of Liberty and free speech will force you to take off your Burqa…:k:

u want to change ur religion :hmmm:

Oh bhai jaaanay do.

This burqa is to keep the memory of Mullah Aziz the Jihadi the lal musjid in-fame.

—He who preach-eth militant uprising,

—runneth under a Burqa

—caughteth by policeman who

—seeth the big halwai belly

----under than black burqa.

hhahahaha.

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

to me it simply mean no one can force religion on anyone else.

Agree with most poeple. You have the right to choose or change your religion. Nobody has the right to stop you from accepting or rejecting a religion or to impose their version of a religion that they might share with you. This can be extended to offering namaz or following other teachings of islam. Nobody should force others to perform any of these.

Good post.

Code_red! I think you didn't understand what I was saying in my post. That was not the information I agree with but the information we were injected with in university by pseudo ulemas. of course this is not the teaching of Islam and I agree with your POV in this regard

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

ok... i did not read whole thread but only NIKSIK's question....
i wanted to add my two bit of understanding.

no compulsion in religion means...you cannot force islam on anyone...you can only tell them about it..that is preach only but dont FORCE them to accept.

BUT once you have accepted islam then sweeties you HAVE to FOLLOW ALL orders of QURAN and RASOOL...now since you have accepted to submit to Allah now there is compulsion....now you HAVE TO SUBMIT .

I disagree. One is free to accept or leave Islam on his/her own will. When you cannot force anyone to accept islam, you cannot force them to stay Muslim either.

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

I've always wondered what these words mean...tried searching for an interpretation/commentary several times on the Internet.

The way I interpret it is that........faith which is rooted mainly in fear is not true faith. And if someone is using compulsion or force to make you believe in something.....than that "belief" of yours is not sincere because it's not coming from the heart; it lacks willingness because it stems chiefly from fear. Such faith has little value.

I think Allah wants us to use our intellect and look at signs that prove His existence. And the Quran uses examples in the natural world to encourage us to ponder over this.

What "reward" would you gain from threatening someone to believe??? That would be the opposite of dawa. Invitation and compulsion are two very different things. Also, the Quran mentions that had the Prophet SAWS been harsh.....people would flee from him as opposed to being drawn to Islam.

**There is no compulsion in Faith. The correct way has become distinct from the erroneous. Now, whoever rejects the Rebel and believes in Allah has grasped the strongest **ring that **never breaks. **And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. (Verse 256)

Commentary

** One who holds on to Islam firmly stays protected against destruction and deprivation. It was for this reason that such a person was likened to one who holds on firmly to the ‘ring’, the looped support of a strong rope, and thus manages to avoid falling down. As there is no danger of such a rope breaking apart and causing a fall, so there is no danger of destruction or loss in Islam – should somebody just abandon the rope, that would be an entirely different matter. And should somebody abandon Islam itself, that would be an entirely different matter too. (Maulana Thanavi: Bayan al-Qur’an).**

** Keeping this verse in view, some people raise objections. They say this verse tells us that there is no compulsion in faith, although the teaching of* jihad *and qital (fighting) in Islam appears contrary to this principle.

**Looking at this a little carefully, we can find out that the objection is not valid, since the teaching of *jihad *and *qital in Islam is not to coerce people into accepting Faith. Had it been so, why would there be Islamic injunctions of jizyah *to provide an umbrella of security for *kuffar *(disbelievers) which protects their life, property and honour? In fact, this is to remove disorder, strife or fasad, for Allah Almighty dislikes fasad, which is what the kuffar are after. Therefore, Allah Almighty says:

** And they go about the earth spreading disorder and Allah does not like those who spread disorder. (5:64)**

** It is for this reason that Allah Almighty has ordained that the *fasad *created by these people should be removed by jihad and qital. So, killing such people is like the killing of serpents, scorpions and their harmful likes.

** Islam has firmly banned the killing of women, children, the aged and the crippled etc., even in the heat of* jihad *on the battlefield, since they are incapable of creating disorder. Similarly, it has stopped the killing of those who become law-abiding citizens by promising to pay jizyah (compensatory dues paid by free non-Muslims under Muslim rule against guarantee of the security of their life, property and honour).

** This approach of Islam makes it clear that it does not force people to accept and enter Faith, rather far from it, by using it as a method of stopping oppression in the world, it hopes to establish justice and equity and peace and security. When Sayyidna ‘Umar(RA) invited an old Christian woman to accept Islam, she said in reply: I am an old woman nearing death.’ Hearing this, Sayyidna 'Umar(RA) did not force her to come into the fold of Islam. In fact, he recited this very verse: ‘there is no compulsion in Faith.’**

**Really and truly, coercion and compulsion to make one accept a faith are not possible at all because faith is not related to outward physical response; it relates to the heart. Coercion and compulsion affect nothing but the outsides of physique and this is all that is affected by *jihad *and *qital (fighting in the way of Allah). Consequently, it is just not possible that people can be forced to accept faith through these measures. This proves that the verses of jihad *and *qital *are not contradictory to the verse: (There is no compulsion in Faith). (Mazhari, Qurtubi)

Ma’ariful Quran
**

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

i said if you are MUSLIM then there is compulsion to follow its rules....u cannot force to be a mulim and ofcourse u cannot force anyone to stay muslim..imaan is in heart if u dont believe you are not muslim.

^ this post is excellent

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

ok thanks. Make sense. Do you think theres compulsion from other muslims on a muslim who is not following Islam ?

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

^ compulsion? i dont know but ammar bil ma'roof and nahi anil munkir!!!!
we are supposed to correct a wrong by hand, or tongue or at least consider it bad in heart.

Re: There is no compulsion in religion

^ The above has to be in context to what we have authority over. If we have not been given authority then we can only speak out against it and are not allowed to stop it with our hands.

The fact that there is no compulsion in religion means that "there is no NEED to use compulsion for (the true) religion" It comes naturally ...

People are not forced to be righteous, but they should feel obliged to be righteous - through an inner sense of compulsion.

And it applies equally to Muslims as well as non-Muslims

Your asking if there is? Yes no doubt about it. Those are ignorant people.

BUT

Let's not mix up compulsion with calling out the fitna. Which, is the duty of every Muslim in this world. If we see an impostor, liar, deceitful, corrupt, dirty person trying to claim prophet hood or nabuwat or mahdi status or whatever he claims, then it's the Muslim's job to be ready to defend the religion from the fitna. Yes here I'm talking about you know what! ;) So don't get started Mr. Popat.

If i wanted, i can, as always give you the reply to that, but hey, i need to distinguish myself from you, and what better way to do this than to ignore this hatred post of yours.

anyway, thanks for your input. Appreciate it :)

PS: psyah, good post. thanks.

many others have answered very well to the main topic of the thread, i would like to comment only on this question which you two raised...

Qatl-e-murtad is part of Islam. when someone first enters Islam, he is supposed to accept the entire religion. s/he takes oath to follow Islam, which includes adherence to all the laws/ rules. so they accept that if we now leave Islam, punishment will be to get killed.

now, how this punishment (qatl-e-murtad and others eg: qat'a yadain etc) will be given (or not) is a different story, and different schools of thought have different opinion on it, which we are not discussing here.

and one important thing, do not single out Islam in qatl-e-murtad, because other religion(s), such as Judaism also have this punishment in their shariah

Shariah = Quran + Sunnah

Sunnah = practical and easy to understand and follow explanation of Quran

Hadith = thats how we learn of Quran and Sunnah

the moment you start treating these separately, you go nowhere, but straight down the drain

so oh you burqa! the wise one, the west lover, stop misleading people on this board!

and how funny you did not understand the real meaning of obama's post