Lets collect all the theories behind the bombings:
The ‘administration’ story; four young men carried out the co-ordinated attacks with one ‘mastermind’ still at large.
The four young men suspected are totally innocent. They were going about their own business and wrongfully accused because of their Muslim back ground. Someone else carried out the bombing.
The four young men suspected are totally innocent. ‘Someone’ or ‘Some organization’ knew where they were and blew the trains. Then plotted evidence in their homes to frame them.
The four young men suspected were lead to believe they are part of a security drill, instead it wasn’t a security drill. They were blown up and then evidence planted at their house.
I don’t need to prove or disprove any stories. I just want to understand the claims. Everyone puts up a sarcastic remark here or there but no one spills out what they believe.
My understanding is that no evidence of deliberate involvement in the attacks has been found at the homes of at least 3 individuals.
5) The four young men suspected are totally innocent. Someone duped them into carrying bags with bombs hidden inside and into heading towards 4 different places in London.
Seminole, I dont need no stinking theory, all I need is a "damning" proof as another guppy put it. Show me the proof....that is all. Personal document at the scene does not count as a proof neither does video of the four together getting ready to board the train.
Ok, and while I am conducting that investigation... how about you work on some damning proof that it is someone trying to pin it on the muslims so we get a license to kill for another 3 to 4 years.
Seminole, all I have to do is look at my voting card and it tells me that George Bush used 9/11 as a licnese to kill muslims in Iraq when he did not have a single shred of evidence that linked Saddam to terrorisim or as a threta to US security. Need more?
hmm… so we can therefore conclude that all the terrorist attacks - past, present, and future are cooked up by Bush? That’s your evidence? Wow, if it’s that easy to become a conspiricy theorist, no wonder it is so prevelent in the Muslim world.
And your ‘proof’ is as solid as pudding. Dear God, I hope to never sit before a jury of you guys. You claim the administration’s proof is suspect and you are convinced by conjecture and assumptions.
Ahmadjee, can you please stop saying “administration”? That applies to the american government system, Britain didn’t lose your people’s war of independence just to have the labels of your government cast upon us
It’s the Blair Government, NOT the Blair Administration
Maddy, wait till you guys realize that the parliamentarian system isn't a good thing. Only then you will start calling your Queen the second lady. First being the wife of our President.
