The Review

This is August 2007, few months to election, why don’t ( like a sober nation) we evaluate the politicians who are going to be our choices in upcoming elections.

Pervaiz Musharaf is right on the top of the list! he is the power figure in the political arena of Pakistan, wearing two hats, has smartly elminated the chances of grand alliance (PML(N) + PPP) is now looking forward to each and every chance to be remain in Power.

Let see what he has given us in his almost 8 years!

On economic grounds he have certainly provided country with a positive figures and only in his era the reserves are making new records every day.

Karachi Stock Market have achived some milstones.
Had open Pakistan for Foriegn Investor and we have seen relatively higher cash inflow in Pakistan. and there are many others of same nature.
Major Projects like Gawadar Deep sea port are also one of his acheivements

along with achievments on economic front, In the era General the crime rate has also broke soem records. the streets of major cities is no more a safe place to walk unless and untill it is guarded by the armed private security men.

Religious fanatics has grown like mashrooms, and no part in the country is safe from them.

Another allegation on Musharaf is that he has joined hand with the same parties who were corrupt and/or on the wanted list of NAB.

So now it is time for us to decide to go for musharaf or not, keeping in mind that this is not the same Musharaf who promised to develop the country. this is a totally different person, who has power hunger and is ready to do or pay any price to stay in Power.

Second is Benazir Bhutto

BB has ruled Pakistan for little over four years and the only achievement ( from where i see) is breaking MQM’s back in Karachi. Other then that she only had corruption cases (in western countries) against her. She is nodoubt trying to surivive, as it is clear that even she is convicted even in of the cases then her political career will be no more. Her lust for power is not a secret, but now compromising with the General is the only option she got.

So matter to be considered is , should we vote for a party who’s prime objective is of the get her corrupt leader another life to suck blood of common Pakistanies.

Third is Nawaz Sharif,
This man has major development projects under his belt, he ruled for little over four years, he is the only politician in Pakistan who have the repu of turning against his allies, 1991 he turned against MQM and ordered a grand operation against them and in 1996 he turned against Ch.biraders of Gujrat, by ordering a police action in that area and killing hundreds of wanted persons hiding in jungle.

NS and SS are not facing any cases of corruption in and out of Pakistan, which gives and indication that either they are not corrupt ( which is too good to believe) or they have done it and haven’t left a trace of it.

Niether are these leaders involved in any kind of deal with musharaf ( not that heard in the news)

Point to be consider is that, should we try them again, will they be better replacement of Musharaf?

Selecting PPP, we will not get a major change in the policies of the govt. yes few faces will be changed but overall impact would be same.

On the other hand, Selecting NS, can change the whole setup and we can hope for some thing differenct.

Re: The Review

I for one welcome our morally corrupt, ghunda b*****shing, bad taste in clothes,hair transplanted overlords!!!

Edhi for president!

Re: The Review

^ :D
He is a good manager...

Re: The Review

Yes I heard about that. The Sharif's have long been accused of carrying out large scale massacres of opponents in Punjab, and being able to cover them up pretty well. Usually under the guise of anti-terrorist operations.

Re: The Review

If u have known the whole truth,

Almost all of those who got killed in that police action was either in Top Ten wanted list or wanted otherwise.

Ch. biraders were sheltering them and use them against their opponents, some of those were sheltered by Ch. Mukhtar & group, hence both groups have their own army of thugs and looters, who helped them to enforce their terror in the region and in return establishments turns a blind eye to them.

Thanks to Shahbaz Shareef who got rid of them

Re: The Review

^
Yes, thanks to Shahbaz for killing hundreds of people in extra-judicial killings.

Re: The Review

We should massacre a few politicans like NS and BB.

Seriously though, if Pakistanis do not elect new faces, then there is no one to blame but the people. That is democracy.

Re: The Review

Pakistani qaum doesnt learn....after everything that "democracy" has taken away from the country and people and puts in its own pockets....us jahil want the same old BB's and NS's to come back and rule over us again!

what this country needs is a revoluntary!!!!!!

Re: The Review

hanibal says: Vote for NS, he is saviour … When he was in power, Pakistan was booming. Fact is that, his years in power would be recognised as one of the worse performing periods. He is convicted person whom President Musharraf gave pardon so that he could be taken off the prison where he was serving 14 years imprisonment and send to Saudi Arabis (so that Saudi Arabia could keep giving oil to Pakistan (around 500 million dollar worth) on differed payment (else, Pakistan had no dollars to pay import bills, cause Nawaz and previously BB stolen most of Pakistani earned dollars).

At present, there are many cases pending against Nawaz on corruption. And though President gave him pardon, that pardon only applies to cases that were concluded. Not to cases that are still pending and whenever Nawaz would come to Pakistan he would have to face the music of court hearings. Nawaz also did plea bargaining with NAB and handed over some of his industrial units to government of Pakistan. Hence, if court would decide Nawaz corruption cases on merit, future of Nawaz is only bleak (same can be said of BB).

Nawaz and his Golden performance in corruption, torture to his opponents as well as cruelty to journalist. Report from British Newspaper, where if incorrect Nawaz could have taken them to court and sue them on libel charges, but obviously Nawaz did not dared to sue, because newspaper had enough evidence.

[This article was published in Oct 1999 in Sunday Observer and was analyzed by The Guardian. Actually, there was also a TV report on Corruption by Nawaz Shareef during those days, much deeper than what is here).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/analysis/story/0,259435,00.html

Search for the millions Sharif ‘stole’

The investigator Pakistan’s PM could not stop

Pakistan coup: special report
Paul Farrelly in London and Jason Burke in Raiwind
Sunday October 24, 1999
The Observer

They tortured Rehman Malik by placing his hands and feet on ice for up to an hour at a time at a ‘safe house’ in Islamabad. Three years on, he still has trouble feeling sensations in his palms and soles from the punishment, meted out in black masks, by Nawaz Sharif’s heavies.

His neck, too, bears the painful crick from a year spent in solitary confinement in a tiny cell at Rawalpindi’s Adila jail with a brick wrapped in newspapers for a pillow. Malik, in mortal fear of convicted terrorists and official hatchet men, found his monthly half-hour visit from his seven-year-old son his single comfort.

Three times following his arrest in November 1996 the courts ordered Malik’s release. Each time he was re-arrested on trumped up charges until, after 12 months of humiliation, the Pakistani Supreme Court itself ruled his detention illegal.

Malik’s crime? To have been the deputy head of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Pakistan’s equivalent of the FBI, investigating allegations of massive corruption by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his family and cronies.

At 46, he was the youngest officer to reach such a senior rank, the equivalent of an army major-general. In a 20-year career, Malik had gained an impressive reputation in the West for anti-terrorist expertise, including investigation of the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing in New York and of Saudi fundamentalist Osama bin Laden. And, after Malik’s inquiries were publicised by The Observer last year, he started a ball rolling which culminated in the coup against Sharif. ‘I have suffered enormously from doing my duty as a civil servant. My friends, family and colleagues have been harassed. My life has been at risk,’ Malik told The Observer in his first UK interview since fleeing Pakistan for London after an attempt on his life 15 months ago. ‘I am not a politician, but I welcome the army’s action. They have saved Pakistan from someone who was ruining the country. As a career officer, I would like to return to fulfil my official obligations as soon as possible.’

He is also promising further explosive revelations, which will implicate Sharif and senior Muslim League politicians in allegedly creaming off more of the country’s wealth overseas.

Malik’s report last year was painful enough for the deposed Prime Minister, as were the cat-and-mouse tactics by which Malik has been a thorn in his side since. The 200-page report, smuggled into the country on Sharif’s official Jumbo jet, set out a secret web of fake bank accounts and firms in offshore tax havens through which Sharif’s family allegedly siphoned off more than $70 million (£40m) into London property, Swiss investments and banks in New York.

The family, whose empire grew hugely while Sharif was in office, was also accused of defaulting on $120m of state bank loans, a favourite way of milking the public purse.

According to further documents seen by The Observer, however, the revelations appear to be the tip of an iceberg. Following inquiries over the past year, Malik says he has established further channels by which the Sharif family channelled money illegally offshore.

They include $2.74m allegedly deposited in the account of an Essex-based Pakistani family at the Atlas BOT (Bank of Tokyo) Investment Bank in Lahore as security for loans to four Sharif family members. They also include $4.6m deposited at the Al Faysal Investment Bank in Islamabad as security for a loan to Hamza Board Mills, a paper and forestry firm in the Sharif family’s Ittefaq group.

Among all his amassed wealth, Sharif also appears to have concealed ownership of a Russian-made Ulan helicopter, which he used during election campaigns. The aircraft, worth more than $1m, was bought from an Arab prince, Sheikh Abdul Rehman Bin Nasir Al Thani of Qatar, in November 1996 and registered in Sharif’s name at the Pakistani Civil Aviation Authority, according to official documents obtained by Malik. It was, however, not declared on Sharif’s statutory filing of assets and liabilities to the country’s Election Commission. ‘This was a man who once told me he could not afford a second-hand Mercedes. How then could he buy a helicopter?’ Malik asks.

Most explosive of all, however, is likely to be Malik’s new investigation, which is almost concluded and alleges laundering of more than $100m offshore via a network of UK trusts, Swiss accounts and offshore havens including Liechtenstein.

An Observer investigation has revealed other instances of alleged corruption during Sharif’s last administration:

• In an emergency budget after Pakistan’s nuclear tests last year, import duties on luxury cars were cut from 325 per cent to 125 per cent. A week later they were restored. In between a friend of Sharif imported 80 cars.
• In 1996 senior figures at Bankers Equity Limited, a finance house, granted a huge loan, believed to be more than £10m, to close associates of Sharif. Last summer the bank collapsed and several senior managers, including a friend of Sharif’s, were arrested. The loan is outstanding.
• After the 1997 elections the Sharif family, and their business concerns, were able to reschedule and renegotiate loans worth nearly £100m from eight banks. When ordered by courts to pay some back they surrendered 33 factories. Only one factory was fully operational, the rest closed, out of order, or both.

Sharif, his family and former Ministers have consistently dismissed the allegations as politically inspired.

Sharif himself is still in ‘preventative custody’, as the army calls it, in a government guesthouse on the outskirts of Islamabad. General Pervez Musharraf, the self-appointed Chief Executive of Pakistan, has not revealed his plans for the man ousted in a coup 10 days ago. Military sources say evidence is being gathered to put Sharif on trial for corruption and possibly treason.

Sharif’s former residence, the 100-acre Raiwind estate, near the city of Lahore in eastern Pakistan, is widely seen as a symbol of the opulent lifestyle the Sharifs have led since their pursuit of power and wealth began to pay off 15 years ago. Last week The Observer was the first Western newspaper to visit it since Sharif’s fall.

Brand new roads lead out of Lahore, where the Sharifs have two other houses, to the walled 100-acre estate. A turning leads to a helicopter pad and a set of steel gates. Beyond is an open, grassy compound where five houses, all in white-washed villa style, lie in a rough circle around a man-made pond. Each has a huge colonnaded porch sheltering a £20,000 four-wheel drive Jeep. Two of the buildings are partially constructed as is a pool, though a lake stocked with fish is completed. There is a small zoo.

All the houses are similar, with deep red carpets and velvet curtains throughout. Sharif’s own house is distinguished by the number of televisions - the Prime Minister was gadget crazy. Now army machine gunners have replaced the bodyguards who previously watched the compound’s perimeter. And the muzzles of their weapons point in as much as out.

Raiwind is, to the ousted Prime Minister’s critics at least, a symbol of how his administration manipulated government to benefit itself.

According to opposition spokesmen, Sharif has ‘used public office for personal economic gain’. It is corruption, they say, even if it is within the letter of the law.

Soon after coming to power for a second time in February 1997 Sharif declared the Raiwind site to be the ‘Prime Minister’s Camp Office’ - his home away from the capital. The local municipal authority took on the estate’s maintenance at an estimated annual cost of 40 million Pakistani rupees (£500,000) and built a new road for it, while the state has also supplied gas, electricity and a 200-line telephone exchange.

Near Raiwind last week feelings were mixed about Sharif’s fall. Many remain loyal to a man they see as a local boy made good. ‘He has done a lot round here,’ said Ahmadullah Ali, a farmer. ‘He is a good man.’ In the rough and tumble world of Pakistani politics Sharif may be down, but he still isn’t out.

Re: The Review

Mush had a chance to get rid of both BB and NS but it seems to be that these "kind" never kills their own "Kind". Infacrt they come for survival once needed.. as we can see now in the Pakistan Political Stage

Re: The Review

we never want them back, we are better of without them, it Mush ( one who used to say that he will never allow these looters and thugs to come back) want them back cause pf his very personel gain.

So if u ask Pakistani people they didn't want any of NS, BB and Mush, but all the three of them are imaging them selves as the saviour of the Nation.

Re: The Review

one can definetly feel that Mr. Sa1eem's was irritated cause i didn't mentioned the his lord Mr. Altaf...

Now where did in my post i said NS has not committed corruption? if Mr. Sa1eem can quote out of my most i'll be most gratefull to him.

last but not least I must recommend to Mr. Sa1eem first read the post and then try to understand and then start commenting or copy pasting.. other irrelvancy is obvious, which can be seen is his very own reply.

Re: The Review

Like the Iranian revolution? :)

Re: The Review

I was talkin more like Mr Guerrero!!!

Re: The Review

Huh?

Re: The Review

Guys, Iranian revolution was not more than the attempt of Mullahs to get hold of wealth of the state, now a days it is a common saying amoung the Iranians that, Mullah's Pocket has a bigger pocket than anyone else.

We need a permanent revolution, and not the change of faces, the mind set of the people need to be changed...

Re: The Review

^

Pakistani's are hardly a revolutionary people to the extent you want them to be. Things are settled through wheeling and dealing, and people just carry on as normal.