The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

Tashkent manuscript cannot be from that time... Kufic is a monumental script and was adopted for papyrus later on. Mashq or Hijazi scritps were originally used for papyrus (as has been proven by epigraphic evidence e.g. the San'a manuscript, Perf 558 etcs for cursive, and Arabic inscriptions on rocks and buildings from the same era being in Kufic script for monumental applications)

Carbon dating also puts Tashkent manuscript in the Second Century H.

Secondly, the article may state what it does... there is no physical evdince to back it up other than tradition. Zaid may have been instrumental as a scribe and his reward rests with God (if he did what is contended). However, it is of no consequence to me. End of story.

You, sir, can believe whatever you want to believe.

Regards,