The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

The Qur’an is still in its Original state after 1430 years
There are a few different ways to prove that the Qur’an is the word of God, which has always been true and has never been subjected to change or distortion.

These proofs can be classified into three types:

  1. The way the Qur’an was transmitted throughout the centuries,
  2. Some challenging verses within the Qur’an itself, and the periodic,
  3. Modern-day discoveries in the universe that were first mentioned in the Qur’an more than fourteen centuries ago.

Unlike the Bible and Old Testament that have been subject to innumerable translations, doubtful and spurious transmissions, and corruptions at the hands of clerics up till now (with the “gender sensitive” versions coming out these days), the Qur’an was transmitted to us in an unprecedented and unique manner according to rigorous rules of transmission. The Qur’an was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) via the angel Gabriel, and the Prophet subsequently memorized the whole scripture.

Thousands of the Companions of the Prophet learned the Qur’an directly from the Prophet (pbuh). They memorized it and were known in Islamic history as huffaadh (the memorizers and preservers of the Qur’an). Moreover, a number of Companions wrote it down during the lifetime of the Prophet (peace be upon him), and it was compiled in its entirety immediately after his death.

The following generation of Muslims learned the Qur’an directly from the Companions. Thus the chain of teaching and learning through direct contact continued systematically, methodically, and meticulously until the present age.

Additionally, several of the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) were appointed as scribes to record the words of the revelation directly from the Prophet himself on parchment, leather, or whatever else was available. The most famous of these scribes was Zayd ibn Thabit, who also memorized the entire Qur’an, and he formed with the others a community of huffaadh that can be compared to academic societies of our present time.

We know the Qur’an was recorded in totality during the lifetime of the Prophet (pbuh) and the different surahs (chapters) personally arranged by him. Many copies of the text were used for study and teaching, even in Mecca before the Hijrah, the migration to Medina.

The entire Qur’an was written down during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad, and trusting the fact that many scholars knew it by heart, it was not collected in one volume. It was personally arranged by him, and the Muslims memorized it in the same order. The companion **Uthman **reported that whenever a new verse was revealed, the Prophet would immediately call a scribe to record it. He would instruct the person to put the specific verse or verses in a particular chapter.

Furthermore, every year during the month of Ramadan, the Prophet would recite the whole Qur’an from beginning to end in its present-day arrangement, and everyday people could hear it from his own lips in the mosque. Its sequence is no mystery. Many of the Companions not only memorized it completely, they also wrote it down and even added commentary (tafseer) on their own personal copies. When the Prophet passed away, the whole Qur’an was already written down, but it was not yet compiled in book form.

During the rule of the first Caliph Abu Bakr, there was a rebellion among some distant Arab tribes that resulted in a series of fierce battles. In one particular battle, a number Companions who had memorized the Qur’an were killed. The Companion Omar worried that the knowledge of the Qur’an was in danger, thus he convinced Abu Bakr that the Qur’an should be compiled into book form as a means of preserving it once and for all.

Zayd bin Thabit was entrusted with this important task. Zayd followed strict methods in his compilation and had dozens of other huffaadh recheck his work to ensure its accuracy. Abu Bakr, who had also committed the entire Qur’an to memory, approved of the final product. After Abu Bakr passed away, the copy was passed to the Caliph ‘Omar, and then Uthman.

However as the Muslim world expanded into lands where the people spoke Arabic as a second language, the new Muslims had a difficult time learning the correct pronunciation of the text. The Caliph Uthman consulted other Companions, and they agreed that official copies of the Qur’an should be inscribed using only the pronunciation of the Quraysh tribe, the Arabic dialect that the Prophet spoke.

Zayd bin Thabit was again given this assignment, and three other huffaadh were assigned to help him in the task. Together, the four scribes borrowed the original, complete copy of the Qur’an, duplicated it manually many times over, and then distributed them to all of the major Muslim cities within the empire. Two of these copies still exist today: one is in Istanbul and the other in Tashkent.

One must keep in mind that in traditional learning in the Arab world, transmission was based upon an oral tradition as well as a written one; the Arabs (and later all Muslims) excelled in accurately reporting scripture, poetry, aphorisms, etc. through the generations without change. Similarly, the chain of huffaadh was never broken, and thus the Qur’an today has reached us in two forms: the memorized version transmitted through the scholarly chain, and the written version based upon the Companions’ initial recording.

If the Qur’an had been changed, there would be huge discrepancies between these two today, as the Qur’an has reached isolated (and sometimes illiterate) communities through the memorized form of transmission without the written form to correct it. No such discrepancies have ever been recorded or reported. In other words, isolated village A in African Mali and isolated village B in Afghanistan will both produce contemporary huffaadh reciting the same words of the Qur’an, though they did not learn from a similar printing of the scripture nor has there ever been a concerted international effort to rectify would-be discrepancies.

Allah has said in the Qur’an that He alone will protect His book, and indeed He has kept His promise. The Qur’an that we read today contains the same exact words that were revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) over 1430 years ago. This is quite a miracle, especially when you consider that NO other group of people can say that their book has not been subject to change by the time it reached the present generation.

Only the Qur’an has survived through the centuries unchanged, and the language in which it was revealed, classical Arabic, still enjoys practical usage around the world. While classic English of the 14th century can be understood by only a very few native English speakers, the Qur’an can be understood by the vast majority of Arabic-speaking Muslims. When compared to other scriptures, the Qur’an is unique in these two respects.

Furthermore, from the prolific arts that have accompanied Qur’anic learning and transmission, we can learn of the auspiciousness and honor with which the Muslims have traditionally held the Qur’an. The visual arts of calligraphy and binding, and the vocal art of recitation represent examples of such arts, and from them we can see that veracity of transmission would be understood as a fundamental aspect of Qur’anic reverence.

As regards the proofs within the Qur’an itself, they can be found in the following Qur’anic challenges:

Surah 17, verse 88:
{Say: If men and jinn should combine together to bring the like of this Quran, they could not bring the like of it, though some of them were aiders of others.}

And Surah 2, verse 23:
{And if you are in doubt as to that which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a chapter like it and call on your witnesses besides Allah if you are truthful.}

Unanimity of Muslim Scholars

The unanimity of Muslim scholars throughout the ages has also proved that the Quran we have is the same which the Prophet had. The same holds true for some unbiased Orientalist scholars who studied the Quran and found the style and the wording exactly the same as that which was common during the time of the Prophet himself.

Another point that needs reflection is that the Quran contains many scientific miracles that were proven to be correct only recently; it therefore stands to reason that had there been any change in the Quran, such verses or many of them, would have disappeared and even changed, and thus proven wrong.

Oral Transmission

Moreover, the Quran has been handed down through generations and centuries by means of oral transmission alongside the written text and that one of the unique merits of Muslims is their ability of maintaining an unbroken chain proving the authenticity of their texts throughout all these centuries.

Many people memorize the Quran in various parts of the world. All of them meet in one place at one time and recite the same Quran. This leaves no doubt that the Quran we have today is the exact one that was recited 1430 ago when the Prophet was alive.

Language of the Quran

Another logical proof is the decline in the level of the Arabic language and the spoken dialects which we find everywhere in the Arab world.

The deterioration in the level of the spoken Arabic, although affecting the tongues of people, did not in fact come close to the Quranic text. It is because of this that we find the Quranic text being unique in the way it is recited and the way it is written.

It is different in the written form as well as the oral form from the other written or oral texts.

**Why? **Because it was protected against the factors of time and space.

And for this job to be completed, Allah has enabled many scholars who specialized in the Quranic text whether in the written or the oral form and made their vocation in life to transmit it as exactly as it existed in the Prophet’s life.

Quranic Manuscripts

Another physical proof showing the authenticity of the Quran is the large number of Quranic manuscripts dating back to the early times of Islam. One of the manuscripts existing today is the personal copy of the mus-haf (physical copy of the Quran) that belonged to Caliph Uthman Ibn Affan.

This copy still carries the traces of the blood of Uthman who was killed when he was reciting the Quran not long ago after the death of the Prophet. The manuscript has been examined not only by Muslims but also by non-Muslims, and it exists till today as standing evidence of the authenticity of the Quran.

By bringing this manuscript and comparing it with all other manuscripts that have been written through different generations in different parts of the Muslim world,** we can see how exactly the same they are.**

We can also notice the difference between the text written there and the normal way of writing Arabic words and the question will rise: why did not the normal way of writing affect the way of writing the Quranic text? The simple answer to this is that the uniqueness of the Quran made it very special and as a way of keeping this specialty is keeping it in the same formula it was firstly written.

Challenging the Quran

A long time ago, the Quran challenged people to produce something similar to one verse or ten verses or one surah of it. The challenge was not met and people are still unable to meet the challenge which means the text is still the same miraculous one that was recited during the Prophet’s lifetime.

Of course, some biased non-Muslim Orientalists have tried their best to raise misconceptions regarding the authenticity of the Quranic text we have today.

These attempts have been very old indeed and all of them have failed to prove anything.

Source:http://www.readingislam.com

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

Just because Zayd b Thabit was entrusted with the EVENTUAL collection of Quran does not mean that he was by any means the most knowledgable of the experts of his time.
Abdullah b Masud, Ubay b Ka'b and Muadh b Jabal were far more knowledgable in this matter and they helped to spread Quran and had numerous Quran recieters or Qurra as they were known] as students.It is these people who helped to keep Quran alive and free from distortion in the memory of people.Today their contributions are mostly ignored because of political reasons.

It is a very well known fact that Zaid bin Thabit(ra) was "APPOINTED" as the person who would have the responsibility to compile the Qur'an together! No ones saying Abdullah b Masud, Ubay b Ka'b and Muadh b Jabal were any inferior to him! If he was appointed by many prominant sahabas then thats obviously because he was more than capable of fulfilling this most important duty and people saw him best to conduct this task! Simple

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

^ u are contradicting yourself, was zayd b thabit superior or not to other sahaba ?
we all know how appointments were being made in uthman's time

I dont understand why are u debating this issue? have u got a problem with who Allah chose to compile the Qur'an together? if you have then you can take it up with him because i have not got time for petty debates! good luck!

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

^ Allah choose ??

please give credit where its due and stop ignoring the contribution of other companions in compilation of Quran.Its meaningless who was appointed head of committe by uthman.

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

where did Allah say that Zaid bin Thabit should compile the Quran? is it mentioned in the book itself? or did he receive Wahi?

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

As always, I see no original points being brought in this debate... in the end one believes what one wants to believe, but if you look objectively at physical epigraphic evidence, you will realize that the Qur'an may have been widely published within early to mid 7 century.

Foremost example of this is the Sana'a manuscripts of the Qur'an that were discovered in 1972. There was an immediate focus by orientalists who were hoping to prove these were "variant" readings. That didn't happen since the samples show no such variation (meaning there are minute differences, similar to those found between Hafs, Warsh and other Qira’aat, but not the kind orientalists wanted to see).

Does this mean Zaid bin Thabit collected it, when it is said he did? Unless you are willing to take Hamza81’s cut&paste routine from readingislam.com as literal fact, there is no physical proof of it.

So rather than bickering over each other's references which neither side will be ready to accept, please look at physical evidence and be empirical.

There is no doubt that the Qur'an was not only transmitted orally by many Muslims who had learned parts or the whole of it, but that it was also written down during the lifetime of the Prophet but it had not been assembled into a single location during the lifetime of the Prophet. As the Revelation progressed throughout the prophets(saw) life, the Prophet and the believers following him recited the text by heart and the scribes in his following also wrote it down. It therefore starts off with two elements of authenticity. This continued up to the prophet’s death.
In the article it clearly states that Zayd bin Thabit was given the assignment to compile together the Qur'an after the prophets(saw) death which had already been recorded and preserved, and three other huffaadh were assigned to help him in the task. Many of the Sahaba had memorized the Qur'an to further ensure the accuracy of what was written down and going to be compiled along with the written and preserved texts. Together, the four scribes borrowed the original, complete copy of the Qur’an, duplicated it manually many times over, and then distributed them to all of the major Muslim cities within the empire. Two of these copies still exist today: **one is in Istanbul and the other in Tashkent. **The oldest Qur'anic documents to be found are all identical further confirming the precision and accuracy of the Qur'an from the begining till now!

Tashkent manuscript cannot be from that time... Kufic is a monumental script and was adopted for papyrus later on. Mashq or Hijazi scritps were originally used for papyrus (as has been proven by epigraphic evidence e.g. the San'a manuscript, Perf 558 etcs for cursive, and Arabic inscriptions on rocks and buildings from the same era being in Kufic script for monumental applications)

Carbon dating also puts Tashkent manuscript in the Second Century H.

Secondly, the article may state what it does... there is no physical evdince to back it up other than tradition. Zaid may have been instrumental as a scribe and his reward rests with God (if he did what is contended). However, it is of no consequence to me. End of story.

You, sir, can believe whatever you want to believe.

Regards,

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

[quote]

Does this mean Zaid bin Thabit collected it, when it is said he did? Unless you are willing to take Hamza81’s cut&paste routine from readingislam.com as literal fact, there is no physical proof of it.

[/quote]

Either version is equally possible even if u look from a neutral standpoint
so why always be so skeptical ? after isnt this what some orientlists like patricia crone have done
but if there were multiple qurans floating around and uthman's copy was "his " version then why didnt his opponents * had a different version?
even in the most bitter accounts of war we dont hear of any differences amongst people with regards to Quran & first 2 caliphs.Afterall accusing your opponent of having a "corrupted text" wud have been of great propoganda value and you know that most of uthman's opponents were Quran recieters*

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

Reich,

*Oscar Wilde once said, " truth, in matters of religion, is simply the opinion that has survived." *.
we know that in matters of history the opinion of the victors survive. the opinions of the vanquished is simply put into the "conspiracy theories" bin. we all know that jewish Holocaust happened. but many historians have doubted it. some accept its figures with a pinch of salt, saying that the figures of six million is a little too high. but since the victors of the second world war have accepted it as a fact, so the whole world says it happened. and history books mention it as such.

so remember, whatever you say, the followers of Usman won at that time. it is quite possible that their version of history has remained. there are a few traditions that put the authenticity of the Quran in doubt. but again, we rubbish them aside as "weak ahadiths". that term in itself looks synonymous to "conspiracy theory" in religious parlance.

Point taken and agreed with (in fact I am not disputing it if you read between the lines). I am disputing the unwavering trust in either version of the story. How is it that we don't see bitter disputes on the issue? My take is that this alone indicates the Qur'an to have been widely published already and the stories of the later collection should not be taken seriously in terms of a MAJOR endeavour.

In fact, if you are to read the text of the pen (Surat ul Qalm) you will notice as if the Prophet is himself writing it and is surprised feeling "this cannot be", and the voices in his conscious assure him "Nun (liquid/ink) and the pen and what they have traced; you by the grace of your Lord are not delusioned"*

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

^hypnotix i am not that familiar with arabic language to reply 2 ur question

no on the contrary most of mainstream scholars are sympatheic to the cause of Ali vs his opponents
so ummayyads might have won the political victory but in history & hadith they are definately seen as the ones backing the wrong side

you cannot say that all hadith grading is a big hoax or coverup ...it is much more complicated than that
if that was the case muslim scholars wud have erased all records of early intra-muslim warfare

I wasn't asking bro. I was only stating my opinion on the issue...

Re: The Qur'an is still in its Original state after 1430 years!

qoran is not the same dear
it was eaten by a goat and verse of stonning is also missing
but still muslims believe qoran is in its original form