The private lives of the Mughals

No surprises but still it looks like an interesting read:

REVIEWS: Imperial intrigues

Reviewed by Dr Tariq Rahman

The interest in the private life of people probably owes its existence to the curiosity about secrets which most human beings possess. However, the private lives of powerful people also provide us with insights into the workings and effects of power. This is the overall impact of the book under review.

The book comprises 11 chapters out of which the last four are about Mughal pastimes, the illumination of the palace, floor coverings, wardrobes, precious stores, etc., and the daily routine of the emperors. Chapter six is about the Mughal kitchen, while chapter seven is about perfumes and incenses. The remaining six chapters are about the harem, women and the works.

R. Nath covers much of what was covered by Dr Mubarak Ali in Shahi Mahal (2000). The description of the kitchen and its functioning is very similar indeed. As for the harem, much of what he says has already been mentioned by K.S. Lal in The Mughal Harem (1988). Similarly, some other material has been covered by historians of the Mughal period. Unfortunately, the author mentions none of his scholarly predecessors — a serious omission.

R. Nath gives concise and easily accessible information about the private lives of the Mughal emperors. He tells us that the Mughals kept their women in the harem which consisted of apartments in an enclosed courtyard. This establishment was supervised by very reliable officers who were often eunuchs. The entire establishment was connected with secret passages which allowed the king to appear in whatever part of the building he wished, thus, creating an aura of mystery around him. The harem had queens, concubines, serving maids as well as relatives (aunts, sisters, cousins, mothers) of the ruler. Even the officers and guards were women. Although the strength of the harem could go well above 5,000 women, not all were kept to provide pleasure to the king and princes. Many of them were for this explicit purpose and the king often had no scruples to add to his collection, women who were reputed for their beauty.

The ladies were constantly guarded and spied upon. As most were neglected by the king, they indulged in affairs with men and, presumably, with women as well. If discovered, the lovers were executed summarily.

The Mughals were quite eclectic and entered into matrimonial alliances with the Hindus in order to reconcile them to their rule. Nath provides evidence that some of them neglected the circumcision of boys which is a common Muslim practice. Another deviation from orthodoxy was that Hindu consorts of the Mughals “were allowed live in their own way and follow their own religious and cultural practices, without violating the general norms of the harem.” This tolerant policy must have contributed to the acceptability of Mughal rule in India.

Wine was very commonly used both by the royalty and the aristocracy. Jahangir drank a lot while others remained within their limits. Aurangzeb was the only one of the great Mughals’ who did not drink wine at all. While opium and other intoxicants were used from the very beginning, tobacco was introduced in North India towards the end of Akbar’s reign (1604-5). It had been brought by the Portuguese from America and entered India through Goa.

The main principle behind the private life of the ruler was to obtain as much gratification as possible. This, indeed, was the measure of his power. Thus, he had, at his disposal, the pleasures of the bed, table, mind, artistic sense, chase, the imposition of the will, etc. Thus he could, if he wished, use slave girls as pieces in a game of Pachisi, though, according to Nath, nobody actually did that. Nath, however, does not convince the reader about the veracity of this piece of information as he gives no evidence about the information he gives.

While denying the myth of using human beings in a game, Nath tells us confidently that Anarkali (Nadira Begum or Sharf-un-Nissa Begum) did have an affair with Prince Salim and Akbar “ordered her to be ‘built’ alive into a wall.” Moreover, Nath further attributes Jahangir’s rebellion against his father to this romance and another one with Mihr-un-Nissa (later Nur Jahan). In such cases, the author should have quoted the original Persian sources but he does not. This detracts from the scholarly value of the book.

Although the author says he did not follow the scholarly methodology in order to avoid jargon and to make the book simple and readable, one feels he could have done both by putting all references in notes. Also, he could have certainly referred to some scholars who have covered similar ground in a chapter which some readers might have skipped if they wished. Finally, a major shortcoming of this book is that it provides no analysis of the way power is exercised in the absence of restraining institutions. The most important insight seems to be the commodification and dehumanisation of women who are treated merely as playthings of the powerful. Such insights should have been brought out and built upon.

On the whole, the book cannot be called either original or scholarly. At best it can be credited with bringing together information scattered in many places.

Private Life of the Mughals of India (1526-1803 A.D.)
By R. Nath
Rupa & Co. Available with Paramount Books,
Jamalistan Shopping Centre, Plot # DC-1, Block 8 Kehkashan,
Clifton, Karachi.
Tel: 021-5833915
Email: [email protected]
ISBN 81-291-0465-2
231pp. Rs469

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

:rolleyes:

I dont like such things. People shouldnot interupt private life of others, even if they are their leaders.

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

[quote]
Another deviation from orthodoxy was that Hindu consorts of the Mughals “were allowed live in their own way and follow their own religious and cultural practices, without violating the general norms of the harem.” This tolerant policy must have contributed to the acceptability of Mughal rule in India.
[/quote]

What do they mean by consort? A wife or concubine? I think in orthodox Islam the latter can be of any religion.

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

We all know the Mughals were players but does the author cite any proofs for what he writes in his book?

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

go figure its written by a Hindu :rolleyes:
main purpose of this book is to degrade Mughals

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

Good Review. I like reviews with opinion and substance, rather than a summary of the book.

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

Although their is no doubt that many of these events were exaggerated but the mughals were decadent rulers but so were all the other dynasties
why dont they write about the indulgences of the hindu rajas

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

There was certainly no shortage of corrruption in the Mughal empire - why be so defensive about it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and you will find that pretty much all empires were on the same level when it comes to evil acts.

Even in Islam, we had four rightly guided caliphs, and after that, barring an occasionally pious ruler, all bets were off.

Why automatically assume that anyone who tells the good and the bad is trying to degrade anyone? A little bit of accuracy in a history book never hurt anyone :)

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

It's my understanding the the mughals actually married rajput hindu women, in most cases to solidify alliances and such. I can't see the rajput kings and tribal chiefs allowing their daughters to be given in an unstable alliance such as concubinage, being that they were peace offerings.

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

i wonder if it discusses mughal pederasty

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

:clap:

furthermore learning from past errors is saving time in order for us to walk the right path and steer clear from those mistakes done previous to us

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

Babur Nama discusses pederasty and homosexuality. The Mughals/uzbeks were not people you'd trust your fmaily members around .......

Re: The private lives of the Mughals

Interesting. I have heard about Mughals and other prominent personalities of their era falling in love with pretty Hindu boys and sodomizing them. Yuck! The thought of anal is so disgusting even with a woman, like why would the poor b**ch (or dog) want something up their bowels?

I’ve read of some well respected Urdu poets falling in love with boys/men and writing poetry in their ishq, now these are not any old qayyum, ejaz or adeeb I’m talking about, these are proper poets who if we were caught reading our parents would be proud of us, lol if my poor mother read some of the homoerotic poetry by the same poets she made me study in home Urdu classes she’d GOD FORBID have an heartattack.

So is it true about Uzbeks? I was watching “Khuda Ki Basti” on Geo TV and it showed an Uzbek looking man in Karachi go after this pretty druggy boy after he heard the boy say to a friend he hopes to find someone to feed his drug habit, now I’ve heard this sort of thing happens in Karachi where they shower boys with gifts and in return get sexual favours, I suppose I shouldn’t rely on hearsay though because people say such things about Pashtuns too which are obviously lies, like the lie about gay marriage in Pashtun regions.