The political future of the army

I think army should have no future in politics.

The political future of the army

No army of the world should have any political future including our own Khakis. Professional soldiers realize this reality and keep away from meddling in politics. In the US, the President is also the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. During the Nixon impeachment process, his Chief of Staff General Alexander Haig advised him to clamp martial law but he refrained. In the UK when the Labour Party was getting strong and the civil war was raging in Ireland, Lord Mountbatten gave a similar suggestion. Indira Gandhi in India, Pierre Trudeau in Canada and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (ZAB) fell into the trap and imposed emergency in the country followed by military action. In the end, all regretted their decisions.
T
he military adventurists in Pakistan were very ordinary soldiers. Except for Yahya Khan, their military record was poor. Ayub Khan should have been sent home as a Major when he abandoned his unit in Burma. About Zia, General Gul Hasan wrote, ‘Not fit to be an officer.’ The 1965 war saved Musharraf, otherwise he would have been court martialed. The Pakistan Army is a professional outfit which has suffered immensely due to adventurism by a non-professional leadership, and it must review how these individuals made it to the top.

Despite his shortcomings, the people of Pakistan tolerated Musharraf, mainly because he was well-meaning as compared to the democratic demons in the country at the time. His decision to contest the Presidential election in uniform and mishandling of the Chief Justice case caused his downfall. The Pakistan Army under the professional leadership of General Raheel Sharif has not only kept away from politics but is willing to clear the mess in Waziristan and Pakistan, which is a good omen.

Who is behind the poor governance in the country and what is the role of Khakis in this mess? There are no simple answers to this question. Between 1958 and 2014, a lot of water has flowed under the bridge of the remaining rivers that we have, as three of them were handed over to the Indians against all international laws. Zia amended clause 25-A of the 1973 constitution, whereby every Pakistani had to be literate by 1985. The time deadline was replaced by “within a reasonable time’, which loosely translated to mean Never.
Ayub Khan’s meddling in politics started with the murder of the first Prime Minister (PM) Liaquat Ali Khan. Khawaja Nazimuddin the stalwart of the Pakistan Movement was made to step down and Baboo Ghulam Muhammed was appointed Governor General. After the complete manipulation of the democratic process by introducing Baboos like Iskander Mirza, Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, Muhammed Ali Bogra etc., martial law was imposed in 1958. Elected Bodies Disqualification Ordinance (EBDO) was issued and the entire political leadership eliminated. Hussain Shaheed Suharwardy bravely fought back. Even the military tribunal could not prove his corruption.

Pakistan Muslim League (Convention) was created to build the political future of the usurper. Democratic demons were introduced in the arena, and the same process continues until today. Civilian institutions built by the founding fathers have been rendered dysfunctional mainly by the demons with help from their Khaki benefactors. After the partyless 1985 elections, each legislator was given a quota for recruitment in return for their loyalty. The Chaudhry’s from Gujarat focused on the department of their forefathers and recruited heavily in the police against all merits. The Sharifs did the same in education, irrigation and revenue departments. On his last day in office as Chief Minister (CM) Punjab, Nawaz Sharif doled out thousands of plots to the party workers leaving LDA with no funds for the development of these societies.

With four martial laws and 56 years of manipulation, the Khakis have not been able to secure a political future. In this misadventure, the nation has suffered at the hands of the democratic demons produced by them through manipulated elections (1977, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1996, 2002, 2008, and 2013). It is time to return to the barracks but in a phased and planned manner.
Democracy cannot be manipulated. A tainted ballot does not quality for a mandate; in fact it negates it. Which system are we trying to save? We have had enough of demons who are now on both sides of the divide. PML (Q) continues to support, while PML (N) desires to control the Khakis. Both there approaches have become irrelevant. Pakistan needs a strong army to protect the territorial integrity of the nation for which they have to operate on the borders and stay in the barracks leaving the political arena to the duly elected leadership.

Today, governance is the biggest challenge faced by the nation. Those of us who have experienced both the rise and fall of the motherland can certainly play a role. Pakistan started from scratch. The founding fathers built institutions for the development of the nation. Since 1958, institution bashing has been going on with empire building. Empires cannot sustain a nation; only functional institutions can. The only functional institution left in the country are the armed forces, and they certainly have a role in nation building and exorcism of the very same demons that they have produced. Pakistan is a constitutional democracy in which the role of each state organ has been defined. Massive cleansing, followed by an honest ballot and finally the return of the Khakis to the barracks, is the way forward for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
n The writer is Ex-Chairman, Pakistan Science Foundation.

Re: The political future of the army

The writer has been careful enough not to antagonise the present chief.

Re: The political future of the army

Pakistan's Leaders whether they belong to the Army or Political Parties are the reflection of the People of Pakistan!

so let us not point fingers at them!

Re: The political future of the army

I did not read the article, but your one-liner is fully correct. Army should have nothing to do with politics at all.

Re: The political future of the army

**I agree with the author accept above. They have destroyed Pakistan, Pakistan really does not need army in the present form, it should be disbanded and a new limited highly professional army be created which represents proportionately the entire population (not Punjabi army only) whose job is to only safeguard the borders only. Present army including every person should be sent home and banning them to re-enter in the army for ever. That is the key to survival of Pakistan. If not kiss good bye to Pakistan.
**

Re: The political future of the army

Totally agree with OP, Army should not have any role in politics, they should look into the matter of national security and do whatever is necessary to keep the state safe.

More importantly, politicians like Shk Rasheed, CH. Brothers should be heavily discouraged because their political existence is based on oxygen from Army only... I doubt we would able to see Shk Rasheed and alike winning a single seat in coming elections if Army kept itself a arms length from the politics.

Re: The political future of the army

Disbanding the army will not change anything. When the former Soviet Union collapsed and many of their security and military agencies were disbanded, many high ranking officers, who were already politically influential, simply found their way into mainstream politics after their agencies were disbanded. It's likely that the same would happen in Pakistan and that the situation would remain the same.

What is required in order to change the current state of things is a drastic change in the political culture of Pakistan. Contrary to popular opinion, it is not the army that is the issue. It is the political system and culture of Pakistan which allows them to overstep their boundaries and influence politics.

Re: The political future of the army

In future, it seems, there would be no role of the army in Pakistan anyhow as there would be no army, because so-called thugs in political clothing would sell Pakistan to the highest bidder and then a large chunk would be part of India, a smaller chunk would be part of Afghanistan and remaining would be part of Iran or maybe a separate country.

Be assured, as things are and as we get thugs in power, no Pakistani leading politician in power would reject couple of billion dollars in their personal Swiss bank account or foreign account of their choice, as politician that get elected into power (by hook or crook) in Pakistan, they love dollars more than country or Allah.

Re: The political future of the army

I don't see why there is so much hatred against shk rasheed? I have never heard a corruption scandal unlike chaudhry bros for him. If it is because of his f-sola alleged scandals, then he is single and islamically, married people with scandals have a stricter punishment against them compared to single folks. Nawaz sharif also tried to hook up with kim barker, so that should be investigated as well if we are going that route.

Re: The political future of the army

It makes sense, but we are not ready to outshine Army through performance. We just want the men in khaki to stay away, come rain or shine.

Army must not have a role in politics, but is this not a fact that every dictator has an endless choice of political endorsement to aid his political misadventure? How many of us speak critical of those who lend their support to dictators? Nawaz Sharif used to say that he would not even shake hands with those who had joined Musharraf's camp. But he embraced literally everyone from Musharraf's team except Chaudhrys' of Gujrat. Sharif has stabbed in the back of those who struggled against Musharraf while he was luxuriously camped in Jaddah.

Re: The political future of the army

If you don't see sun in the morning, it doesn't mean it is still dark out there...

You can follow shk. Rasheed and alike as much as u can...

And then they say we are against status quo .. Lol

Re: The political future of the army

I guess somehow I got included as a nirala even though I have criticized imran's taliban as recently as last week, but please tell me anti-status quo that why are you with gunjas?

Any comment on if it is ok to rig elections or is it bhangra bhangra time with anjuman right now?

Re: The political future of the army

You can buy almost anyone with that kind of money, politician or not. Even a army general.
Billion dollars in swiss accounts - who would not want that, honestly ?